可变浏览通道围篱围场母马及其马驹咀嚼木材的观察研究。

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A Bouquet, C Nicol, M Díez-León
{"title":"可变浏览通道围篱围场母马及其马驹咀嚼木材的观察研究。","authors":"A Bouquet, C Nicol, M Díez-León","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2025.2496496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The natural behaviour of wood-chewing (WC) in horses may, under certain conditions, become excessive or it may precede crib-biting . However, the potential causes of WC, including frustrated foraging motivation) or developmental exploratory or teething behavior are poorly understood. We studied WC in 31 mares and their foals, examining associations with browsing access, stocking density, foal sex and performance of other non-nutritive oral behaviors. Behaviors (counts/hour) were recorded by all-occurrences sampling during focal, continuous observations of grazing,resting and suckling for 20  ×  10 min periods, for three days when foals were 3-5 months of age and kept at pasture with their mares. 17/31 mares and 28/31 foals exhibited WC, with foals performing more WC than mares (Mdn (IQR): foals: 0.95 (0.42,2.26); mares: 0.01 (0,0.19)). Colts exhibited significantly more WC than fillies (F<sub>1,13.07</sub> = 4.855, <i>p</i> = 0.046), possibly because of sex-based differences in exploratory tendencies. The amount of browsing access had a differential effect on mares and foals (F<sub>1,40.29</sub> = 3.720, <i>p</i> = 0.033). However, the amount of browsing access was partially confounded with foal age. Overall, we suggest that WC is associated more with developmental exploration than frustrated foraging access. Experimental work is needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Observational Study of Wood-Chewing in Mares and Their Foals Kept in Fenced Outdoor Paddocks with Variable Browsing Access.\",\"authors\":\"A Bouquet, C Nicol, M Díez-León\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10888705.2025.2496496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The natural behaviour of wood-chewing (WC) in horses may, under certain conditions, become excessive or it may precede crib-biting . However, the potential causes of WC, including frustrated foraging motivation) or developmental exploratory or teething behavior are poorly understood. We studied WC in 31 mares and their foals, examining associations with browsing access, stocking density, foal sex and performance of other non-nutritive oral behaviors. Behaviors (counts/hour) were recorded by all-occurrences sampling during focal, continuous observations of grazing,resting and suckling for 20  ×  10 min periods, for three days when foals were 3-5 months of age and kept at pasture with their mares. 17/31 mares and 28/31 foals exhibited WC, with foals performing more WC than mares (Mdn (IQR): foals: 0.95 (0.42,2.26); mares: 0.01 (0,0.19)). Colts exhibited significantly more WC than fillies (F<sub>1,13.07</sub> = 4.855, <i>p</i> = 0.046), possibly because of sex-based differences in exploratory tendencies. The amount of browsing access had a differential effect on mares and foals (F<sub>1,40.29</sub> = 3.720, <i>p</i> = 0.033). However, the amount of browsing access was partially confounded with foal age. Overall, we suggest that WC is associated more with developmental exploration than frustrated foraging access. Experimental work is needed to confirm our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2496496\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2496496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在某些条件下,马咀嚼木头的自然行为可能会变得过度,或者可能先于咬床。然而,WC的潜在原因(包括觅食动机受挫)或发育性探索或出牙行为尚不清楚。我们研究了31匹母马及其马驹的WC,考察了它们与食物获取、放养密度、马驹性别和其他非营养性口腔行为表现的关系。在马驹3-5月龄与母马一起放牧的3天时间里,通过集中、连续观察放牧、休息和哺乳20 × 10分钟的全发生抽样记录马驹的行为(计数/小时)。17/31母马和28/31马驹表现出排尿,其中马驹排尿率高于母马(Mdn (IQR):马驹:0.95 (0.42,2.26);母马:0.01(0,0.19))。小马驹的WC显著高于母马(F1,13.07 = 4.855, p = 0.046),这可能与性别探索倾向的差异有关。浏览次数对母马和马驹的影响存在差异(F1,40.29 = 3.720, p = 0.033)。然而,浏览次数部分与马驹年龄相混淆。总的来说,我们认为WC更多地与发育探索有关,而不是与觅食受阻有关。需要实验工作来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Observational Study of Wood-Chewing in Mares and Their Foals Kept in Fenced Outdoor Paddocks with Variable Browsing Access.

The natural behaviour of wood-chewing (WC) in horses may, under certain conditions, become excessive or it may precede crib-biting . However, the potential causes of WC, including frustrated foraging motivation) or developmental exploratory or teething behavior are poorly understood. We studied WC in 31 mares and their foals, examining associations with browsing access, stocking density, foal sex and performance of other non-nutritive oral behaviors. Behaviors (counts/hour) were recorded by all-occurrences sampling during focal, continuous observations of grazing,resting and suckling for 20  ×  10 min periods, for three days when foals were 3-5 months of age and kept at pasture with their mares. 17/31 mares and 28/31 foals exhibited WC, with foals performing more WC than mares (Mdn (IQR): foals: 0.95 (0.42,2.26); mares: 0.01 (0,0.19)). Colts exhibited significantly more WC than fillies (F1,13.07 = 4.855, p = 0.046), possibly because of sex-based differences in exploratory tendencies. The amount of browsing access had a differential effect on mares and foals (F1,40.29 = 3.720, p = 0.033). However, the amount of browsing access was partially confounded with foal age. Overall, we suggest that WC is associated more with developmental exploration than frustrated foraging access. Experimental work is needed to confirm our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) publishes articles on methods of experimentation, husbandry, and care that demonstrably enhance the welfare of nonhuman animals in various settings. For administrative purposes, manuscripts are categorized into the following four content areas: welfare issues arising in laboratory, farm, companion animal, and wildlife/zoo settings. Manuscripts of up to 7,000 words are accepted that present new empirical data or a reevaluation of available data, conceptual or theoretical analysis, or demonstrations relating to some issue of animal welfare science. JAAWS also publishes brief research reports of up to 3,500 words that consist of (1) pilot studies, (2) descriptions of innovative practices, (3) studies of interest to a particular region, or (4) studies done by scholars who are new to the field or new to academic publishing. In addition, JAAWS publishes book reviews and literature reviews by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信