{"title":"对“产房与手术室紧急剖宫产的结局差异：基于倾向评分匹配的研究”的修正。","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zhao K, Yuan C, He S, Yan J, Huang J. Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching. <i>Int J Gynecol Obstet</i>. 2025; 168: 1124–1130. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15972</p><p>In the “Patients and Methods” section of the “Abstract”, the text “The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second People's Hospital of Nanning between January 2021 and May 2024. Following propensity score matching, 21 cases were in the delivery room group, and 105 cases were in the operating room group.” was incorrect.</p><p>This should have read: “The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second Nanning People's Hospital between January 2021 and May 2024. Prior to propensity score matching, 21 cases underwent on-the-spot cesarean section in the delivery room, while 105 cases were transferred to the operating room for cesarean section. Following propensity score matching, the analysis included a total of 36 parturients, with 18 in the observational group and 18 in the control group.”.</p><p>In sub-section “1.5 Statistical Analysis” of the “Materials and Methods” section, the text “Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 29.0 statistical software (IBM). The mean ± standard deviation (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mover>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>¯</mo>\n </mover>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>±s) was employed for econometric data conforming to or approximating a normal distribution.” was incorrect.</p><p>This should have read: “The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 29.0 software (IBM). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to match the study group with the control group based on variables including maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gravidity, parity, gestational weeks, pre-operative HB levels, WBC count, NEU%, and HCT. The nearest neighbor matching method was applied with a 1:1 ratio and a matching tolerance of 0.02. Prior to PSM, 21 cases underwent on-the-spot cesarean section in the delivery room, while 105 cases were transferred to the operating room for cesarean section. Following PSM, the analysis included a total of 36 parturients, with 18 in the observational group and 18 in the control group. The mean ± standard deviation (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mover>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>¯</mo>\n </mover>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>±s) was employed for econometric data conforming to or approximating a normal distribution.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":"169 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijgo.70182","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrections to “Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Zhao K, Yuan C, He S, Yan J, Huang J. Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching. <i>Int J Gynecol Obstet</i>. 2025; 168: 1124–1130. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15972</p><p>In the “Patients and Methods” section of the “Abstract”, the text “The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second People's Hospital of Nanning between January 2021 and May 2024. Following propensity score matching, 21 cases were in the delivery room group, and 105 cases were in the operating room group.” was incorrect.</p><p>This should have read: “The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second Nanning People's Hospital between January 2021 and May 2024. Prior to propensity score matching, 21 cases underwent on-the-spot cesarean section in the delivery room, while 105 cases were transferred to the operating room for cesarean section. Following propensity score matching, the analysis included a total of 36 parturients, with 18 in the observational group and 18 in the control group.”.</p><p>In sub-section “1.5 Statistical Analysis” of the “Materials and Methods” section, the text “Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 29.0 statistical software (IBM). The mean ± standard deviation (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>¯</mo>\\n </mover>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math>±s) was employed for econometric data conforming to or approximating a normal distribution.” was incorrect.</p><p>This should have read: “The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 29.0 software (IBM). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to match the study group with the control group based on variables including maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gravidity, parity, gestational weeks, pre-operative HB levels, WBC count, NEU%, and HCT. The nearest neighbor matching method was applied with a 1:1 ratio and a matching tolerance of 0.02. Prior to PSM, 21 cases underwent on-the-spot cesarean section in the delivery room, while 105 cases were transferred to the operating room for cesarean section. Following PSM, the analysis included a total of 36 parturients, with 18 in the observational group and 18 in the control group. The mean ± standard deviation (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mover>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>¯</mo>\\n </mover>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math>±s) was employed for econometric data conforming to or approximating a normal distribution.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"169 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijgo.70182\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.70182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.70182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corrections to “Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching”
Zhao K, Yuan C, He S, Yan J, Huang J. Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2025; 168: 1124–1130. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15972
In the “Patients and Methods” section of the “Abstract”, the text “The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second People's Hospital of Nanning between January 2021 and May 2024. Following propensity score matching, 21 cases were in the delivery room group, and 105 cases were in the operating room group.” was incorrect.
This should have read: “The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second Nanning People's Hospital between January 2021 and May 2024. Prior to propensity score matching, 21 cases underwent on-the-spot cesarean section in the delivery room, while 105 cases were transferred to the operating room for cesarean section. Following propensity score matching, the analysis included a total of 36 parturients, with 18 in the observational group and 18 in the control group.”.
In sub-section “1.5 Statistical Analysis” of the “Materials and Methods” section, the text “Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 29.0 statistical software (IBM). The mean ± standard deviation (±s) was employed for econometric data conforming to or approximating a normal distribution.” was incorrect.
This should have read: “The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 29.0 software (IBM). Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to match the study group with the control group based on variables including maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gravidity, parity, gestational weeks, pre-operative HB levels, WBC count, NEU%, and HCT. The nearest neighbor matching method was applied with a 1:1 ratio and a matching tolerance of 0.02. Prior to PSM, 21 cases underwent on-the-spot cesarean section in the delivery room, while 105 cases were transferred to the operating room for cesarean section. Following PSM, the analysis included a total of 36 parturients, with 18 in the observational group and 18 in the control group. The mean ± standard deviation (±s) was employed for econometric data conforming to or approximating a normal distribution.”
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
