[从高血压角度探讨阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者低氧血症的评估标准]。

Q4 Medicine
L L Yu, S Z Zou, Y Y Jia, R Zhang, J R Li
{"title":"[从高血压角度探讨阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者低氧血症的评估标准]。","authors":"L L Yu, S Z Zou, Y Y Jia, R Zhang, J R Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241022-00593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To determine appropriate cutoff values for evaluating hypoxemia severity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study selected data from 1, 781 young patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who underwent polysomnography in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2015 to June 2023. The cohort included 1, 604 males and 177 females, with a mean age of (32.6±5.3) years. The relationship between the minimum arterial oxygen saturation (MSaO<sub>2</sub>) and the prevalence of hypertension in this population was investigated. Subjects were categorized into seven groups based on MSaO<sub>2</sub> levels: Group 1 (MSaO<sub>2</sub>≥90%), Group 2 (85%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><90%), Group 3 (80%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><85%), Group 4 (75%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><80%), Group 5 (70%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><75%), Group 6 (65%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><70%), and Group 7 (MSaO<sub>2</sub><65%). The prevalence of hypertension in each group was statistically analyzed, and the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in hypertension prevalence. The diagnostic performance of the new versus traditional grouping methods was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 1, 781 OSA patients, 915 had hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension in Groups 1 to 7 was 27.8%, 42.4%, 52.2%, 54.1%, 59.5%, 70.5%, and 75.4%, respectively. Significant differences in hypertension prevalence were observed between Group 1 and other groups, Group 2 and Groups 5-7, Group 3 and Groups 6-7, and Group 4 and Group 7(χ2=187.94,<i>P</i><0.001). After merging the groups based on MSaO<sub>2</sub> thresholds of≥90%, 90%>MSaO<sub>2</sub>≥85%, 85%>MSaO<sub>2</sub>≥75%, and MSaO<sub>2</sub><75%, the prevalence of hypertension in the new groups was 27.8%, 42.4%, 53.0%, and 71.2%, respectively, with significant differences between adjacent groups(χ2=178.99,<i>P</i><0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the new grouping method (0.676) was higher than that for the original grouping method (0.664). <b>Conclusions:</b> As hypoxemia severity increases in OSA, so does the prevalence of comorbid hypertension. Using MSaO<sub>2</sub> cutoff values of 90%, 85%, and 75% to categorize hypoxemia severity appears more appropriate compared to the existing guideline values of 90%, 85%, and 80%.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 4","pages":"441-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Exploring the criteria for assessing hypoxemia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea from the standpoint of hypertension].\",\"authors\":\"L L Yu, S Z Zou, Y Y Jia, R Zhang, J R Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241022-00593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To determine appropriate cutoff values for evaluating hypoxemia severity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study selected data from 1, 781 young patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who underwent polysomnography in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2015 to June 2023. The cohort included 1, 604 males and 177 females, with a mean age of (32.6±5.3) years. The relationship between the minimum arterial oxygen saturation (MSaO<sub>2</sub>) and the prevalence of hypertension in this population was investigated. Subjects were categorized into seven groups based on MSaO<sub>2</sub> levels: Group 1 (MSaO<sub>2</sub>≥90%), Group 2 (85%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><90%), Group 3 (80%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><85%), Group 4 (75%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><80%), Group 5 (70%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><75%), Group 6 (65%≤MSaO<sub>2</sub><70%), and Group 7 (MSaO<sub>2</sub><65%). The prevalence of hypertension in each group was statistically analyzed, and the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in hypertension prevalence. The diagnostic performance of the new versus traditional grouping methods was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 1, 781 OSA patients, 915 had hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension in Groups 1 to 7 was 27.8%, 42.4%, 52.2%, 54.1%, 59.5%, 70.5%, and 75.4%, respectively. Significant differences in hypertension prevalence were observed between Group 1 and other groups, Group 2 and Groups 5-7, Group 3 and Groups 6-7, and Group 4 and Group 7(χ2=187.94,<i>P</i><0.001). After merging the groups based on MSaO<sub>2</sub> thresholds of≥90%, 90%>MSaO<sub>2</sub>≥85%, 85%>MSaO<sub>2</sub>≥75%, and MSaO<sub>2</sub><75%, the prevalence of hypertension in the new groups was 27.8%, 42.4%, 53.0%, and 71.2%, respectively, with significant differences between adjacent groups(χ2=178.99,<i>P</i><0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the new grouping method (0.676) was higher than that for the original grouping method (0.664). <b>Conclusions:</b> As hypoxemia severity increases in OSA, so does the prevalence of comorbid hypertension. Using MSaO<sub>2</sub> cutoff values of 90%, 85%, and 75% to categorize hypoxemia severity appears more appropriate compared to the existing guideline values of 90%, 85%, and 80%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"441-446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241022-00593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20241022-00593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者低氧血症严重程度的合适临界值。方法:选取2015年1月至2023年6月在解放军总医院第六医疗中心耳鼻喉头颈外科接受多导睡眠图检查的1781例阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)年轻患者进行横断面研究。该队列包括男性1604人,女性177人,平均年龄(32.6±5.3)岁。研究了该人群最低动脉血氧饱和度(MSaO2)与高血压患病率的关系。根据MSaO2水平将受试者分为7组:1组(MSaO2≥90%),2组(85%≤MSaO2 222222)。结果:1781例OSA患者中,915例存在高血压。1 ~ 7组高血压患病率分别为27.8%、42.4%、52.2%、54.1%、59.5%、70.5%、75.4%。1组与其他组、2组与5-7组、3组与6-7组、4组与7组高血压患病率差异均有统计学意义(χ2=187.94,P2阈值≥90%、90%>MSaO2≥85%、85%>MSaO2≥75%、MSaO2≥85%)。结论:随着OSA低氧血症严重程度的增加,合并高血压的患病率也随之增加。与现有的90%、85%和80%的指导值相比,使用90%、85%和75%的MSaO2临界值来划分低氧血症严重程度似乎更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Exploring the criteria for assessing hypoxemia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea from the standpoint of hypertension].

Objective: To determine appropriate cutoff values for evaluating hypoxemia severity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: This cross-sectional study selected data from 1, 781 young patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who underwent polysomnography in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2015 to June 2023. The cohort included 1, 604 males and 177 females, with a mean age of (32.6±5.3) years. The relationship between the minimum arterial oxygen saturation (MSaO2) and the prevalence of hypertension in this population was investigated. Subjects were categorized into seven groups based on MSaO2 levels: Group 1 (MSaO2≥90%), Group 2 (85%≤MSaO2<90%), Group 3 (80%≤MSaO2<85%), Group 4 (75%≤MSaO2<80%), Group 5 (70%≤MSaO2<75%), Group 6 (65%≤MSaO2<70%), and Group 7 (MSaO2<65%). The prevalence of hypertension in each group was statistically analyzed, and the chi-square test was used to identify significant differences in hypertension prevalence. The diagnostic performance of the new versus traditional grouping methods was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Among the 1, 781 OSA patients, 915 had hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension in Groups 1 to 7 was 27.8%, 42.4%, 52.2%, 54.1%, 59.5%, 70.5%, and 75.4%, respectively. Significant differences in hypertension prevalence were observed between Group 1 and other groups, Group 2 and Groups 5-7, Group 3 and Groups 6-7, and Group 4 and Group 7(χ2=187.94,P<0.001). After merging the groups based on MSaO2 thresholds of≥90%, 90%>MSaO2≥85%, 85%>MSaO2≥75%, and MSaO2<75%, the prevalence of hypertension in the new groups was 27.8%, 42.4%, 53.0%, and 71.2%, respectively, with significant differences between adjacent groups(χ2=178.99,P<0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the new grouping method (0.676) was higher than that for the original grouping method (0.664). Conclusions: As hypoxemia severity increases in OSA, so does the prevalence of comorbid hypertension. Using MSaO2 cutoff values of 90%, 85%, and 75% to categorize hypoxemia severity appears more appropriate compared to the existing guideline values of 90%, 85%, and 80%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信