Nikita Arumalla, James B Galloway, Joanna Ledingham, Toby Garrood, Sam Norton
{"title":"肌肉骨骼健康问卷(MSK-HQ)的心理测量评估:炎症性关节炎的验证和测量不变性。","authors":"Nikita Arumalla, James B Galloway, Joanna Ledingham, Toby Garrood, Sam Norton","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkaf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) co-produced for use across musculoskeletal diseases. This study analyses the validity, reliability, sensitivity to change and measurement invariance of the MSK-HQ in inflammatory arthritis (IA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5106 patients recruited to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) between May 2018 and March 2020 with a diagnosis of IA were included. Patients completed PROMs at baseline and 3 and 12 months alongside clinic visits. Convergent validity was assessed in relation to the HAQ-II, Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4) and 28-item DAS (DAS28). Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Hierarchical tests for configural, metric and scalar invariance determined measurement invariance in item CFAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MSK-HQ total score correlated well with the HAQ-II (<i>r</i> = -0.79) and PHQ-4 (<i>r</i> = -0.66) and moderately with the DAS28 (<i>r</i> = -0.42). A unidimensional structure for the MSK-HQ was confirmed only when two items relating to illness perception were excluded. The MSK-HQ total score demonstrated good sensitivity to change. Reliability was high (α = 0.93). The minimum clinically important difference was 4 points across the IA subtypes. Significance was noted in tests of DIF for a few MSK-HQ items, but the level of bias was small.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence for the validity and sensitivity to change of the MSK-HQ in patients with IA, with a change of >4 points likely to be clinically meaningful. The MSK-HQ has high convergent and construct validity and is sensitive to change, providing a valuable tool for clinical care and research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"rkaf041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A psychometric evaluation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ): validation and measurement invariance in inflammatory arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Nikita Arumalla, James B Galloway, Joanna Ledingham, Toby Garrood, Sam Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkaf041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) co-produced for use across musculoskeletal diseases. This study analyses the validity, reliability, sensitivity to change and measurement invariance of the MSK-HQ in inflammatory arthritis (IA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 5106 patients recruited to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) between May 2018 and March 2020 with a diagnosis of IA were included. Patients completed PROMs at baseline and 3 and 12 months alongside clinic visits. Convergent validity was assessed in relation to the HAQ-II, Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4) and 28-item DAS (DAS28). Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Hierarchical tests for configural, metric and scalar invariance determined measurement invariance in item CFAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MSK-HQ total score correlated well with the HAQ-II (<i>r</i> = -0.79) and PHQ-4 (<i>r</i> = -0.66) and moderately with the DAS28 (<i>r</i> = -0.42). A unidimensional structure for the MSK-HQ was confirmed only when two items relating to illness perception were excluded. The MSK-HQ total score demonstrated good sensitivity to change. Reliability was high (α = 0.93). The minimum clinically important difference was 4 points across the IA subtypes. Significance was noted in tests of DIF for a few MSK-HQ items, but the level of bias was small.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence for the validity and sensitivity to change of the MSK-HQ in patients with IA, with a change of >4 points likely to be clinically meaningful. The MSK-HQ has high convergent and construct validity and is sensitive to change, providing a valuable tool for clinical care and research studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"rkaf041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A psychometric evaluation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ): validation and measurement invariance in inflammatory arthritis.
Objectives: The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) co-produced for use across musculoskeletal diseases. This study analyses the validity, reliability, sensitivity to change and measurement invariance of the MSK-HQ in inflammatory arthritis (IA).
Methods: A total of 5106 patients recruited to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) between May 2018 and March 2020 with a diagnosis of IA were included. Patients completed PROMs at baseline and 3 and 12 months alongside clinic visits. Convergent validity was assessed in relation to the HAQ-II, Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4) and 28-item DAS (DAS28). Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Hierarchical tests for configural, metric and scalar invariance determined measurement invariance in item CFAs.
Results: The MSK-HQ total score correlated well with the HAQ-II (r = -0.79) and PHQ-4 (r = -0.66) and moderately with the DAS28 (r = -0.42). A unidimensional structure for the MSK-HQ was confirmed only when two items relating to illness perception were excluded. The MSK-HQ total score demonstrated good sensitivity to change. Reliability was high (α = 0.93). The minimum clinically important difference was 4 points across the IA subtypes. Significance was noted in tests of DIF for a few MSK-HQ items, but the level of bias was small.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the validity and sensitivity to change of the MSK-HQ in patients with IA, with a change of >4 points likely to be clinically meaningful. The MSK-HQ has high convergent and construct validity and is sensitive to change, providing a valuable tool for clinical care and research studies.