早产儿益生菌败血症的发病率和发病风险:一项荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Keith Feldman, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Lucy B Pappas, Jermine Harriet Romald, Shelby L Olson, Alexandra Oschman, Alain C Cuna, Venkatesh Sampath
{"title":"早产儿益生菌败血症的发病率和发病风险:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Keith Feldman, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Lucy B Pappas, Jermine Harriet Romald, Shelby L Olson, Alexandra Oschman, Alain C Cuna, Venkatesh Sampath","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04072-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For preterm infants, supplementation with probiotics improves rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other morbidities. Case reports of probiotic sepsis have prompted warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Federal Drug Administration. However, incidence rates of probiotic sepsis are lacking, making it challenging to evaluate risk-benefit tradeoffs. We performed a meta-analysis and review of probiotic sepsis events in preterm infants to evaluate tradeoffs against NEC, mortality, and clinical sepsis outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dual-reviewers screened 160 articles, selecting 77 for review. Pooled estimates of incidence were computed using random-effect models. Case reports captured infant demographics, hospital course, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 20,323 exposed infants across 63 studies, 8 probiotic sepsis cases were identified [estimate: 0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]. Risk-benefit calculations note an additional 62 cases of NEC, 42 deaths, and 92 clinical sepsis events in the unexposed cohort per case of probiotic sepsis. Case reports identified 27 probiotic sepsis events, mostly in extremely-low-birthweight infants (median GA/BW: 28 weeks, 970.0 g) and those at risk for bacterial translocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotic sepsis is extremely rare in preterm infants, with the greatest risk in an identifiable sub-population. Estimates highlighted increased morbidities in unexposed cohorts compared to probiotic sepsis incidence, suggesting consideration of risk-benefit may be warranted.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study quantifies the risk of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants utilizing a meta-analysis. In over 20,000 exposed infants across 40 randomized trials and 23 observational studies, 8 cases of probiotic sepsis were identified (<0.04%). Assessing this risk against improvements in morbidities with probiotic use, we can expect 62 more cases of NEC, 42 more deaths, and 92 more cases of clinical sepsis per case of probiotic sepsis (1:2500) avoided in the unexposed group. While the use of probiotics carries risk, rates for probiotic sepsis presented by this analysis highlight a favorable benefit/risk ratio in preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of probiotic sepsis and morbidity risk in premature infants: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Keith Feldman, Janelle R Noel-MacDonnell, Lucy B Pappas, Jermine Harriet Romald, Shelby L Olson, Alexandra Oschman, Alain C Cuna, Venkatesh Sampath\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41390-025-04072-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For preterm infants, supplementation with probiotics improves rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other morbidities. Case reports of probiotic sepsis have prompted warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Federal Drug Administration. However, incidence rates of probiotic sepsis are lacking, making it challenging to evaluate risk-benefit tradeoffs. We performed a meta-analysis and review of probiotic sepsis events in preterm infants to evaluate tradeoffs against NEC, mortality, and clinical sepsis outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dual-reviewers screened 160 articles, selecting 77 for review. Pooled estimates of incidence were computed using random-effect models. Case reports captured infant demographics, hospital course, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 20,323 exposed infants across 63 studies, 8 probiotic sepsis cases were identified [estimate: 0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]. Risk-benefit calculations note an additional 62 cases of NEC, 42 deaths, and 92 clinical sepsis events in the unexposed cohort per case of probiotic sepsis. Case reports identified 27 probiotic sepsis events, mostly in extremely-low-birthweight infants (median GA/BW: 28 weeks, 970.0 g) and those at risk for bacterial translocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotic sepsis is extremely rare in preterm infants, with the greatest risk in an identifiable sub-population. Estimates highlighted increased morbidities in unexposed cohorts compared to probiotic sepsis incidence, suggesting consideration of risk-benefit may be warranted.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study quantifies the risk of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants utilizing a meta-analysis. In over 20,000 exposed infants across 40 randomized trials and 23 observational studies, 8 cases of probiotic sepsis were identified (<0.04%). Assessing this risk against improvements in morbidities with probiotic use, we can expect 62 more cases of NEC, 42 more deaths, and 92 more cases of clinical sepsis per case of probiotic sepsis (1:2500) avoided in the unexposed group. While the use of probiotics carries risk, rates for probiotic sepsis presented by this analysis highlight a favorable benefit/risk ratio in preterm infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04072-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04072-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于早产儿,补充益生菌可以提高坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)和其他发病率。益生菌败血症的病例报告已经引起了美国儿科学会和联邦药物管理局的警告。然而,缺乏益生菌败血症的发病率,这使得评估风险-收益权衡具有挑战性。我们对早产儿的益生菌败血症事件进行了荟萃分析和回顾,以评估对NEC、死亡率和临床败血症结果的权衡。方法:双审稿人筛选160篇文献,从中选择77篇进行综述。使用随机效应模型计算发生率的汇总估计。病例报告包括婴儿人口统计、住院过程和结果。结果:在63项研究中,20,323名暴露的婴儿中,确定了8例益生菌败血症病例[估计:0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]。风险-收益计算表明,在未暴露的队列中,每例益生菌败血症增加62例NEC病例,42例死亡和92例临床败血症事件。病例报告确定了27例益生菌败血症事件,主要发生在极低出生体重婴儿(平均出生体重/体重:28周,970.0 g)和有细菌易位风险的婴儿。结论:益生菌败血症在早产儿中极为罕见,在一个可识别的亚群中风险最大。与益生菌败血症发生率相比,估计强调未暴露人群的发病率增加,提示考虑风险-收益可能是有必要的。影响:本研究利用荟萃分析量化了早产儿益生菌败血症的风险。在40项随机试验和23项观察性研究中,超过20,000名接触过益生菌的婴儿中,发现了8例益生菌败血症(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of probiotic sepsis and morbidity risk in premature infants: a meta-analysis.

Background: For preterm infants, supplementation with probiotics improves rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and other morbidities. Case reports of probiotic sepsis have prompted warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Federal Drug Administration. However, incidence rates of probiotic sepsis are lacking, making it challenging to evaluate risk-benefit tradeoffs. We performed a meta-analysis and review of probiotic sepsis events in preterm infants to evaluate tradeoffs against NEC, mortality, and clinical sepsis outcomes.

Methods: Dual-reviewers screened 160 articles, selecting 77 for review. Pooled estimates of incidence were computed using random-effect models. Case reports captured infant demographics, hospital course, and outcome.

Results: For 20,323 exposed infants across 63 studies, 8 probiotic sepsis cases were identified [estimate: 0% (95% CI: 0-10%)]. Risk-benefit calculations note an additional 62 cases of NEC, 42 deaths, and 92 clinical sepsis events in the unexposed cohort per case of probiotic sepsis. Case reports identified 27 probiotic sepsis events, mostly in extremely-low-birthweight infants (median GA/BW: 28 weeks, 970.0 g) and those at risk for bacterial translocation.

Conclusion: Probiotic sepsis is extremely rare in preterm infants, with the greatest risk in an identifiable sub-population. Estimates highlighted increased morbidities in unexposed cohorts compared to probiotic sepsis incidence, suggesting consideration of risk-benefit may be warranted.

Impact: This study quantifies the risk of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants utilizing a meta-analysis. In over 20,000 exposed infants across 40 randomized trials and 23 observational studies, 8 cases of probiotic sepsis were identified (<0.04%). Assessing this risk against improvements in morbidities with probiotic use, we can expect 62 more cases of NEC, 42 more deaths, and 92 more cases of clinical sepsis per case of probiotic sepsis (1:2500) avoided in the unexposed group. While the use of probiotics carries risk, rates for probiotic sepsis presented by this analysis highlight a favorable benefit/risk ratio in preterm infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信