X上的口吃表征:内容、情绪和影响的详细分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Amir Hossein Rasoli Jokar, Hamid Karimi, J Scott Yaruss
{"title":"X上的口吃表征:内容、情绪和影响的详细分析。","authors":"Amir Hossein Rasoli Jokar, Hamid Karimi, J Scott Yaruss","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Social media shapes public perceptions of various topics, including health conditions and communication challenges, such as stuttering. This study analyzed the stuttering-related posts on X (formerly Twitter), a platform chosen for its unique features, including real-time interaction, concise messaging, and public accessibility. X's hashtag system also enables efficient tracking of trends and aggregating relevant posts, making it ideal for thematic and sentiment analysis. This study examined X to explore how stuttering is represented and perceived in top stuttering-related posts. It focused on these posts' themes, sentiments, and engagement patterns, as well as their influence on perceptions of stuttering on the platform.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this exploratory study, data from 153 highly engaged posts containing the hashtag \"#stuttering\" were analyzed using sentiment analysis, thematic analysis, and network analysis. Posts were selected based on engagement scores calculated from the number of likes, comments, and reposts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sentiment analysis revealed that 69.93% of posts conveyed positive sentiments, with the majority of these posted by self-identified stuttering advocates, while 6.54% reflected negative sentiments and 23.53% were neutral. Five key themes emerged from the data: (a) celebrating stuttering success, (b) enhancing awareness and education about stuttering, (c) navigating challenges through support, (d) addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma, and (e) systematic advocacy and policy reform. Network analysis reflected the critical role of health care professionals and advocacy organizations in shaping public perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted both the supportive and stigmatizing aspects of stuttering representation on X. While prominent figures and organizations drive positive engagement, targeted efforts are still needed to address negative stereotypes. These findings provide insights for future public health communication and advocacy strategies in the stuttering community.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stuttering Representation on X: A Detailed Analysis of Content, Sentiment, and Influences.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Hossein Rasoli Jokar, Hamid Karimi, J Scott Yaruss\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Social media shapes public perceptions of various topics, including health conditions and communication challenges, such as stuttering. This study analyzed the stuttering-related posts on X (formerly Twitter), a platform chosen for its unique features, including real-time interaction, concise messaging, and public accessibility. X's hashtag system also enables efficient tracking of trends and aggregating relevant posts, making it ideal for thematic and sentiment analysis. This study examined X to explore how stuttering is represented and perceived in top stuttering-related posts. It focused on these posts' themes, sentiments, and engagement patterns, as well as their influence on perceptions of stuttering on the platform.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this exploratory study, data from 153 highly engaged posts containing the hashtag \\\"#stuttering\\\" were analyzed using sentiment analysis, thematic analysis, and network analysis. Posts were selected based on engagement scores calculated from the number of likes, comments, and reposts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sentiment analysis revealed that 69.93% of posts conveyed positive sentiments, with the majority of these posted by self-identified stuttering advocates, while 6.54% reflected negative sentiments and 23.53% were neutral. Five key themes emerged from the data: (a) celebrating stuttering success, (b) enhancing awareness and education about stuttering, (c) navigating challenges through support, (d) addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma, and (e) systematic advocacy and policy reform. Network analysis reflected the critical role of health care professionals and advocacy organizations in shaping public perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted both the supportive and stigmatizing aspects of stuttering representation on X. While prominent figures and organizations drive positive engagement, targeted efforts are still needed to address negative stereotypes. These findings provide insights for future public health communication and advocacy strategies in the stuttering community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:社交媒体塑造公众对各种主题的看法,包括健康状况和沟通挑战,如口吃。这项研究分析了X(以前的Twitter)上与口吃相关的帖子,该平台因其独特的功能而被选中,包括实时交互、简洁的消息传递和公共可访问性。X的标签系统还可以有效地跟踪趋势和聚合相关帖子,使其成为主题和情感分析的理想选择。本研究考察了X,以探索在与口吃相关的高层职位中,口吃是如何被表征和感知的。它关注这些帖子的主题、情绪和参与模式,以及它们对平台上口吃认知的影响。方法:本探索性研究采用情感分析、主题分析和网络分析的方法,对153篇包含“#stutter”标签的高参与度帖子进行数据分析。帖子是根据喜欢、评论和转发的数量计算的参与度得分来选择的。结果:情绪分析显示,69.93%的帖子表达了积极情绪,其中以自我认同的口吃倡导者居多,6.54%的帖子表达了消极情绪,23.53%的帖子表达了中性情绪。从数据中得出了五个关键主题:(a)庆祝口吃的成功;(b)加强对口吃的认识和教育;(c)通过支持应对挑战;(d)消除误解和减少污名;(e)系统的宣传和政策改革。网络分析反映了保健专业人员和倡导组织在塑造公众观念方面的关键作用。结论:本研究突出了x上口吃代表的支持和污名化两个方面。虽然知名人士和组织推动了积极的参与,但仍需要有针对性的努力来消除负面刻板印象。这些发现为未来在口吃社区的公共卫生传播和宣传策略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stuttering Representation on X: A Detailed Analysis of Content, Sentiment, and Influences.

Background and aims: Social media shapes public perceptions of various topics, including health conditions and communication challenges, such as stuttering. This study analyzed the stuttering-related posts on X (formerly Twitter), a platform chosen for its unique features, including real-time interaction, concise messaging, and public accessibility. X's hashtag system also enables efficient tracking of trends and aggregating relevant posts, making it ideal for thematic and sentiment analysis. This study examined X to explore how stuttering is represented and perceived in top stuttering-related posts. It focused on these posts' themes, sentiments, and engagement patterns, as well as their influence on perceptions of stuttering on the platform.

Method: In this exploratory study, data from 153 highly engaged posts containing the hashtag "#stuttering" were analyzed using sentiment analysis, thematic analysis, and network analysis. Posts were selected based on engagement scores calculated from the number of likes, comments, and reposts.

Results: The sentiment analysis revealed that 69.93% of posts conveyed positive sentiments, with the majority of these posted by self-identified stuttering advocates, while 6.54% reflected negative sentiments and 23.53% were neutral. Five key themes emerged from the data: (a) celebrating stuttering success, (b) enhancing awareness and education about stuttering, (c) navigating challenges through support, (d) addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma, and (e) systematic advocacy and policy reform. Network analysis reflected the critical role of health care professionals and advocacy organizations in shaping public perceptions.

Conclusions: This study highlighted both the supportive and stigmatizing aspects of stuttering representation on X. While prominent figures and organizations drive positive engagement, targeted efforts are still needed to address negative stereotypes. These findings provide insights for future public health communication and advocacy strategies in the stuttering community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信