Xue-Li Zhang, Chen Zhang, Lu Lang, Jia-Wen Yi, Min Zhu, Yu-Hui Zhang
{"title":"基线血清尿酸与非小细胞肺癌患者静脉血栓栓塞和临床结局的关系","authors":"Xue-Li Zhang, Chen Zhang, Lu Lang, Jia-Wen Yi, Min Zhu, Yu-Hui Zhang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the association between baseline serum uric acid (SUA) level and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective analysis of 626 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent/progressive NSCLC between September 2021 and August 2024. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for risk factors related to VTE, and clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected and compared according to these values. Fine-Gray regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of VTE, and survival was analyzed using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 72 patients (11.50%) experienced VTE. Patients with VTE had a higher baseline SUA level than those without VTE (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of baseline SUA to predict VTE was 310 μmol/L. The incidence of VTE was higher in the high SUA group than that of the low SUA group (19.1% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the baseline SUA level was associated with the risk of VTE (sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.830, 95% CI 1.689-4.742, p = 0.000). Additionally, the higher SUA level was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) in newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC staged I-IIIA (adjusted HR = 1.948, 95% CI 1.121-3.384, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among NSCLC patients, a baseline feature of high SUA (≥ 310 μmol/L) was associated with an increased risk of VTE and a worse clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 9","pages":"e70076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Baseline Serum Uric Acid With Venous Thromboembolism and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Xue-Li Zhang, Chen Zhang, Lu Lang, Jia-Wen Yi, Min Zhu, Yu-Hui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-7714.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the association between baseline serum uric acid (SUA) level and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective analysis of 626 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent/progressive NSCLC between September 2021 and August 2024. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for risk factors related to VTE, and clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected and compared according to these values. Fine-Gray regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of VTE, and survival was analyzed using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 72 patients (11.50%) experienced VTE. Patients with VTE had a higher baseline SUA level than those without VTE (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of baseline SUA to predict VTE was 310 μmol/L. The incidence of VTE was higher in the high SUA group than that of the low SUA group (19.1% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the baseline SUA level was associated with the risk of VTE (sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.830, 95% CI 1.689-4.742, p = 0.000). Additionally, the higher SUA level was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) in newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC staged I-IIIA (adjusted HR = 1.948, 95% CI 1.121-3.384, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among NSCLC patients, a baseline feature of high SUA (≥ 310 μmol/L) was associated with an increased risk of VTE and a worse clinical outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"e70076\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of Baseline Serum Uric Acid With Venous Thromboembolism and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the association between baseline serum uric acid (SUA) level and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 626 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent/progressive NSCLC between September 2021 and August 2024. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for risk factors related to VTE, and clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected and compared according to these values. Fine-Gray regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of VTE, and survival was analyzed using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.
Results: In the study, 72 patients (11.50%) experienced VTE. Patients with VTE had a higher baseline SUA level than those without VTE (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of baseline SUA to predict VTE was 310 μmol/L. The incidence of VTE was higher in the high SUA group than that of the low SUA group (19.1% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the baseline SUA level was associated with the risk of VTE (sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.830, 95% CI 1.689-4.742, p = 0.000). Additionally, the higher SUA level was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) in newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC staged I-IIIA (adjusted HR = 1.948, 95% CI 1.121-3.384, p = 0.018).
Conclusions: Among NSCLC patients, a baseline feature of high SUA (≥ 310 μmol/L) was associated with an increased risk of VTE and a worse clinical outcome.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.