Leehi Joo, Jung Hwan Baek, Jungbok Lee, Dong Eun Song, Sae Rom Chung, Young Jun Choi, Jeong Hyun Lee
{"title":"在诊断滤泡型肿瘤时,芯针活检优于细针穿刺:一项多中心研究,聚焦于Bethesda IV结果。","authors":"Leehi Joo, Jung Hwan Baek, Jungbok Lee, Dong Eun Song, Sae Rom Chung, Young Jun Choi, Jeong Hyun Lee","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2024.1022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic outcomes of core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using Bethesda IV as a test-positive criterion for diagnosing follicular-patterned neoplasms in a large multicenter cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 5463 thyroid nodules ≥1 cm from 4883 patients (4019 females, 864 males; mean age 53.8 years) that underwent FNA or CNB across 26 hospitals in Korea between June and September 2015. The final diagnosis in cases diagnosed as Bethesda IV (follicular neoplasm) in biopsies were confirmed by surgical pathology. The primary study outcome was the diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of nodules with follicular-patterned neoplasms confirmed at surgery after receiving Bethesda IV results on biopsy (FNA or CNB), among all that underwent biopsy. Secondary outcomes included false referral rate (FRR) and positive predictive value (PPV). All nodules were analyzed before matching (823 and 4640 nodules for CNB and FNA, respectively) and after nodule matching in a 1:2 ratio (799 and 1571 nodules, respectively) according to age, sex, nodule size, and Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) category. Additionally, the diagnostic yields of various histological subtypes of follicular-patterned neoplasms and nodule subgroups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CNB demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic yield than FNA both before (9.0% vs. 0.5%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and after matching (9.0% vs. 0.6%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). CNB consistently had higher diagnostic yields than FNA for most histological subtypes and all subgroups. FRR was not significantly different between the CNB and FNA groups after matching (0.4% vs. 0.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.337). The PPV was consistently greater than 90% for both methods, with no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNB had a higher diagnostic yield than FNA for follicular-patterned neoplasms, with no significant difference in FRR using Bethesda IV as the test-positive criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"604-615"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superior Diagnostic Yield of Core Needle Biopsy Over Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Follicular-Patterned Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study Focusing on Bethesda IV Results.\",\"authors\":\"Leehi Joo, Jung Hwan Baek, Jungbok Lee, Dong Eun Song, Sae Rom Chung, Young Jun Choi, Jeong Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/kjr.2024.1022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic outcomes of core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using Bethesda IV as a test-positive criterion for diagnosing follicular-patterned neoplasms in a large multicenter cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 5463 thyroid nodules ≥1 cm from 4883 patients (4019 females, 864 males; mean age 53.8 years) that underwent FNA or CNB across 26 hospitals in Korea between June and September 2015. The final diagnosis in cases diagnosed as Bethesda IV (follicular neoplasm) in biopsies were confirmed by surgical pathology. The primary study outcome was the diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of nodules with follicular-patterned neoplasms confirmed at surgery after receiving Bethesda IV results on biopsy (FNA or CNB), among all that underwent biopsy. Secondary outcomes included false referral rate (FRR) and positive predictive value (PPV). All nodules were analyzed before matching (823 and 4640 nodules for CNB and FNA, respectively) and after nodule matching in a 1:2 ratio (799 and 1571 nodules, respectively) according to age, sex, nodule size, and Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) category. Additionally, the diagnostic yields of various histological subtypes of follicular-patterned neoplasms and nodule subgroups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CNB demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic yield than FNA both before (9.0% vs. 0.5%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and after matching (9.0% vs. 0.6%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). CNB consistently had higher diagnostic yields than FNA for most histological subtypes and all subgroups. FRR was not significantly different between the CNB and FNA groups after matching (0.4% vs. 0.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.337). The PPV was consistently greater than 90% for both methods, with no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNB had a higher diagnostic yield than FNA for follicular-patterned neoplasms, with no significant difference in FRR using Bethesda IV as the test-positive criterion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"604-615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123080/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.1022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.1022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在一个大型多中心队列中,比较核心针活检(CNB)和细针穿刺(FNA)的诊断结果,Bethesda IV作为诊断滤泡型肿瘤的阳性标准。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入4883例≥1 cm甲状腺结节5463例(女性4019例,男性864例;2015年6月至9月在国内26家医院接受FNA或CNB的患者(平均年龄53.8岁)。活检诊断为Bethesda IV(滤泡性肿瘤)的病例经手术病理证实。主要研究结果是诊断率,定义为接受Bethesda IV活检结果(FNA或CNB)后手术确诊的滤泡型肿瘤结节在所有活检患者中的比例。次要结局包括假转诊率(FRR)和阳性预测值(PPV)。根据年龄、性别、结节大小和韩国甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(K-TIRADS)分类,对所有结节进行匹配前(CNB和FNA分别为823和4640个结节)和匹配后(分别为799和1571个结节)1:2比例的分析。此外,还分析了各种组织学亚型滤泡型肿瘤和结节亚组的诊断率。结果:CNB的诊断率明显高于FNA (9.0% vs. 0.5%;P < 0.001)和匹配后(9.0% vs. 0.6%;P < 0.001)。在大多数组织学亚型和所有亚组中,CNB的诊断率始终高于FNA。配对后,CNB组和FNA组的FRR无显著差异(0.4% vs. 0.1%;P = 0.337)。两种方法的PPV均大于90%,无显著差异。结论:CNB对滤泡型肿瘤的诊断率高于FNA,以Bethesda IV为阳性标准的FRR无显著差异。
Superior Diagnostic Yield of Core Needle Biopsy Over Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Follicular-Patterned Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study Focusing on Bethesda IV Results.
Objective: To compare the diagnostic outcomes of core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using Bethesda IV as a test-positive criterion for diagnosing follicular-patterned neoplasms in a large multicenter cohort.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 5463 thyroid nodules ≥1 cm from 4883 patients (4019 females, 864 males; mean age 53.8 years) that underwent FNA or CNB across 26 hospitals in Korea between June and September 2015. The final diagnosis in cases diagnosed as Bethesda IV (follicular neoplasm) in biopsies were confirmed by surgical pathology. The primary study outcome was the diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of nodules with follicular-patterned neoplasms confirmed at surgery after receiving Bethesda IV results on biopsy (FNA or CNB), among all that underwent biopsy. Secondary outcomes included false referral rate (FRR) and positive predictive value (PPV). All nodules were analyzed before matching (823 and 4640 nodules for CNB and FNA, respectively) and after nodule matching in a 1:2 ratio (799 and 1571 nodules, respectively) according to age, sex, nodule size, and Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) category. Additionally, the diagnostic yields of various histological subtypes of follicular-patterned neoplasms and nodule subgroups were analyzed.
Results: CNB demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic yield than FNA both before (9.0% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.001) and after matching (9.0% vs. 0.6%; P < 0.001). CNB consistently had higher diagnostic yields than FNA for most histological subtypes and all subgroups. FRR was not significantly different between the CNB and FNA groups after matching (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P = 0.337). The PPV was consistently greater than 90% for both methods, with no significant difference.
Conclusion: CNB had a higher diagnostic yield than FNA for follicular-patterned neoplasms, with no significant difference in FRR using Bethesda IV as the test-positive criterion.
期刊介绍:
The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences.
A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge.
World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.