{"title":"金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜相关感染:我们是否发现了临床相关的靶点?","authors":"Karen E Beenken, Mark S Smeltzer","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms13040852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is one of the most diverse bacterial pathogens. This is reflected in its ability to cause a wide array of infections and in genotypic and phenotypic differences between clinical isolates that extend beyond their antibiotic resistance status. Many <i>S. aureus</i> infections, including those involving indwelling medical devices, are therapeutically defined by the formation of a biofilm. This is reflected in the number of reports focusing on <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm formation and biofilm-associated infections. These infections are characterized by a level of intrinsic resistance that compromises conventional antibiotic therapy irrespective of acquired resistance, suggesting that an inhibitor of biofilm formation would have tremendous clinical value. Many reports have described large-scale screens aimed at identifying compounds that limit <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm formation, but relatively few examined whether the limitation was sufficient to overcome this intrinsic resistance. Similarly, while many of these reports examined the impact of putative inhibitors on <i>S. aureus</i> phenotypes, very few took a focused approach to identify and optimize an effective inhibitor of specific biofilm-associated targets. Such approaches are dependent on validating a target, hopefully one that is not restricted by the diversity of <i>S. aureus</i> as a bacterial pathogen. Rigorous biological validation of such a target would allow investigators to virtually screen vast chemical libraries to identify potential inhibitors that warrant further investigation based on their predicted function. Here, we summarize reports describing <i>S. aureus</i> regulatory loci implicated in biofilm formation to assess whether they are viable targets for the development of an anti-biofilm therapeutic strategy with an emphasis on whether <i>sarA</i> has been sufficiently validated to warrant consideration in this important clinical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Biofilm-Associated Infections: Have We Found a Clinically Relevant Target?\",\"authors\":\"Karen E Beenken, Mark S Smeltzer\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/microorganisms13040852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is one of the most diverse bacterial pathogens. This is reflected in its ability to cause a wide array of infections and in genotypic and phenotypic differences between clinical isolates that extend beyond their antibiotic resistance status. Many <i>S. aureus</i> infections, including those involving indwelling medical devices, are therapeutically defined by the formation of a biofilm. This is reflected in the number of reports focusing on <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm formation and biofilm-associated infections. These infections are characterized by a level of intrinsic resistance that compromises conventional antibiotic therapy irrespective of acquired resistance, suggesting that an inhibitor of biofilm formation would have tremendous clinical value. Many reports have described large-scale screens aimed at identifying compounds that limit <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm formation, but relatively few examined whether the limitation was sufficient to overcome this intrinsic resistance. Similarly, while many of these reports examined the impact of putative inhibitors on <i>S. aureus</i> phenotypes, very few took a focused approach to identify and optimize an effective inhibitor of specific biofilm-associated targets. Such approaches are dependent on validating a target, hopefully one that is not restricted by the diversity of <i>S. aureus</i> as a bacterial pathogen. Rigorous biological validation of such a target would allow investigators to virtually screen vast chemical libraries to identify potential inhibitors that warrant further investigation based on their predicted function. Here, we summarize reports describing <i>S. aureus</i> regulatory loci implicated in biofilm formation to assess whether they are viable targets for the development of an anti-biofilm therapeutic strategy with an emphasis on whether <i>sarA</i> has been sufficiently validated to warrant consideration in this important clinical context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microorganisms\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microorganisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm-Associated Infections: Have We Found a Clinically Relevant Target?
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most diverse bacterial pathogens. This is reflected in its ability to cause a wide array of infections and in genotypic and phenotypic differences between clinical isolates that extend beyond their antibiotic resistance status. Many S. aureus infections, including those involving indwelling medical devices, are therapeutically defined by the formation of a biofilm. This is reflected in the number of reports focusing on S. aureus biofilm formation and biofilm-associated infections. These infections are characterized by a level of intrinsic resistance that compromises conventional antibiotic therapy irrespective of acquired resistance, suggesting that an inhibitor of biofilm formation would have tremendous clinical value. Many reports have described large-scale screens aimed at identifying compounds that limit S. aureus biofilm formation, but relatively few examined whether the limitation was sufficient to overcome this intrinsic resistance. Similarly, while many of these reports examined the impact of putative inhibitors on S. aureus phenotypes, very few took a focused approach to identify and optimize an effective inhibitor of specific biofilm-associated targets. Such approaches are dependent on validating a target, hopefully one that is not restricted by the diversity of S. aureus as a bacterial pathogen. Rigorous biological validation of such a target would allow investigators to virtually screen vast chemical libraries to identify potential inhibitors that warrant further investigation based on their predicted function. Here, we summarize reports describing S. aureus regulatory loci implicated in biofilm formation to assess whether they are viable targets for the development of an anti-biofilm therapeutic strategy with an emphasis on whether sarA has been sufficiently validated to warrant consideration in this important clinical context.
期刊介绍:
Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.