总分配成本效益分析:一种为资源分配提供信息的卫生经济评估新工具。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shan Jiang, Boyang Li, Bonny Parkinson, Shunping Li, Yuanyuan Gu
{"title":"总分配成本效益分析:一种为资源分配提供信息的卫生经济评估新工具。","authors":"Shan Jiang, Boyang Li, Bonny Parkinson, Shunping Li, Yuanyuan Gu","doi":"10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health equity is a growing concern for policymakers across the globe. Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), commonly used in evaluating health interventions, primarily focuses on the average and aggregate health outcomes in the targeted population, neglecting the distributional impacts on health equity. This gap calls for approaches that can quantify the impact of intervention of interest on health equity to support decision-making. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) offers a framework to assess the distributional impacts of health interventions. Based on DCEA, aggregate DCEA (A-DCEA) was proposed as a practical and simplified alternative to DCEA. Unlike full DCEA, which requires detailed subgroup data, A-DCEA utilizes aggregated data, making it accessible and feasible for broader use. In this commentary, we discuss the rationale for A-DCEA, outline the steps for its implementation, and highlight its applicability. The purpose of this article is to introduce A-DCEA as a pragmatic and accessible tool for evaluating the equity implications of healthcare interventions. A-DCEA can inform policymakers by incorporating equity considerations into healthcare decision-making, particularly when conducting a full DCEA is impractical due to data limitation. A-DCEA provides a valuable and accessible method for evaluating the distributional impact of interventions, promoting health equity in decision-making. Its adoption can lead to more informed health policy that considers health inequities as well as the efficient use of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis: a novel tool for health economic evaluation to inform resource allocation.\",\"authors\":\"Shan Jiang, Boyang Li, Bonny Parkinson, Shunping Li, Yuanyuan Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health equity is a growing concern for policymakers across the globe. Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), commonly used in evaluating health interventions, primarily focuses on the average and aggregate health outcomes in the targeted population, neglecting the distributional impacts on health equity. This gap calls for approaches that can quantify the impact of intervention of interest on health equity to support decision-making. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) offers a framework to assess the distributional impacts of health interventions. Based on DCEA, aggregate DCEA (A-DCEA) was proposed as a practical and simplified alternative to DCEA. Unlike full DCEA, which requires detailed subgroup data, A-DCEA utilizes aggregated data, making it accessible and feasible for broader use. In this commentary, we discuss the rationale for A-DCEA, outline the steps for its implementation, and highlight its applicability. The purpose of this article is to introduce A-DCEA as a pragmatic and accessible tool for evaluating the equity implications of healthcare interventions. A-DCEA can inform policymakers by incorporating equity considerations into healthcare decision-making, particularly when conducting a full DCEA is impractical due to data limitation. A-DCEA provides a valuable and accessible method for evaluating the distributional impact of interventions, promoting health equity in decision-making. Its adoption can lead to more informed health policy that considers health inequities as well as the efficient use of resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00415-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生公平是全球决策者日益关注的问题。通常用于评估卫生干预措施的传统成本效益分析(CEA)主要关注目标人群的平均和总体健康结果,而忽略了分配对卫生公平的影响。这一差距要求采取能够量化有关干预措施对卫生公平的影响的方法,以支持决策。分配成本效益分析(DCEA)为评估卫生干预措施的分配影响提供了一个框架。在DCEA的基础上,提出了聚合DCEA (aggregate DCEA, a -DCEA)作为DCEA的一种实用、简化的替代方案。与需要详细子组数据的完整DCEA不同,A-DCEA利用聚合数据,使其可访问且可广泛使用。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了A-DCEA的基本原理,概述了其实现的步骤,并强调了其适用性。本文的目的是介绍a - dcea作为评估医疗保健干预的公平影响的实用和可访问的工具。a -DCEA可以通过将公平考虑纳入医疗保健决策,特别是在由于数据限制而无法进行完整的DCEA时,为决策者提供信息。a - dcea为评价干预措施的分配影响、促进决策中的卫生公平提供了一种有价值和可获得的方法。它的通过可导致制定更明智的卫生政策,考虑到卫生不公平现象以及资源的有效利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis: a novel tool for health economic evaluation to inform resource allocation.

Health equity is a growing concern for policymakers across the globe. Conventional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), commonly used in evaluating health interventions, primarily focuses on the average and aggregate health outcomes in the targeted population, neglecting the distributional impacts on health equity. This gap calls for approaches that can quantify the impact of intervention of interest on health equity to support decision-making. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) offers a framework to assess the distributional impacts of health interventions. Based on DCEA, aggregate DCEA (A-DCEA) was proposed as a practical and simplified alternative to DCEA. Unlike full DCEA, which requires detailed subgroup data, A-DCEA utilizes aggregated data, making it accessible and feasible for broader use. In this commentary, we discuss the rationale for A-DCEA, outline the steps for its implementation, and highlight its applicability. The purpose of this article is to introduce A-DCEA as a pragmatic and accessible tool for evaluating the equity implications of healthcare interventions. A-DCEA can inform policymakers by incorporating equity considerations into healthcare decision-making, particularly when conducting a full DCEA is impractical due to data limitation. A-DCEA provides a valuable and accessible method for evaluating the distributional impact of interventions, promoting health equity in decision-making. Its adoption can lead to more informed health policy that considers health inequities as well as the efficient use of resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信