围产期父亲健康与健康行为:2018-2019年格鲁吉亚父亲代表性调查结果

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s10995-025-04090-x
Raj M Dalal, Clarissa D Simon, John James Parker, Anne Bendelow, Michael Bryan, Craig F Garfield
{"title":"围产期父亲健康与健康行为:2018-2019年格鲁吉亚父亲代表性调查结果","authors":"Raj M Dalal, Clarissa D Simon, John James Parker, Anne Bendelow, Michael Bryan, Craig F Garfield","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04090-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the associations between paternal sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare utilization and self-reported health status among a state-representative sample of fathers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for Dads pilot study sampled 857 fathers in Georgia from October 2018-July 2019. It surveyed fathers 2-6 months after their infants' birth to assess paternal experiences and behaviors during the perinatal period. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between paternal characteristics and three outcomes: having a primary care physician (PCP), having any personal healthcare visit, and self-reported health status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 266 respondents, 53.9% reported having a PCP, 46.2% reported any healthcare visit, and 65.2% reported very good or excellent health. Insured fathers were more likely to have a PCP (65.6% vs. 26.6%; adjusted Prevalence Ratio [aPR] = 2.47, 95% CI 1.41-4.33) and a healthcare visit (59.9% vs. 21.5%; aPR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.30-5.22) than fathers who were uninsured. Fathers with a college degree or higher were more likely to have a healthcare visit (59.4% vs. % 39.3%; aPR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.49), and to report very good or excellent health (79.1% vs. % 52.2%; aPR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-1.98) than fathers with a high school diploma/GED or less. Fathers reporting very good or excellent health were more likely to have a PCP (59.9% vs. 42.1%); aPR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.99) than fathers reporting fair or good health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fathers' participation in healthcare was suboptimal. Identifying barriers impacting men's interactions with the healthcare system is essential to develop strategies to improve the overall health of fathers and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"669-675"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paternal Health and Health Behaviors During the Perinatal Period: Results from a Representative Survey of Fathers in Georgia, 2018-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Raj M Dalal, Clarissa D Simon, John James Parker, Anne Bendelow, Michael Bryan, Craig F Garfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-025-04090-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the associations between paternal sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare utilization and self-reported health status among a state-representative sample of fathers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for Dads pilot study sampled 857 fathers in Georgia from October 2018-July 2019. It surveyed fathers 2-6 months after their infants' birth to assess paternal experiences and behaviors during the perinatal period. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between paternal characteristics and three outcomes: having a primary care physician (PCP), having any personal healthcare visit, and self-reported health status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 266 respondents, 53.9% reported having a PCP, 46.2% reported any healthcare visit, and 65.2% reported very good or excellent health. Insured fathers were more likely to have a PCP (65.6% vs. 26.6%; adjusted Prevalence Ratio [aPR] = 2.47, 95% CI 1.41-4.33) and a healthcare visit (59.9% vs. 21.5%; aPR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.30-5.22) than fathers who were uninsured. Fathers with a college degree or higher were more likely to have a healthcare visit (59.4% vs. % 39.3%; aPR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.49), and to report very good or excellent health (79.1% vs. % 52.2%; aPR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-1.98) than fathers with a high school diploma/GED or less. Fathers reporting very good or excellent health were more likely to have a PCP (59.9% vs. 42.1%); aPR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.99) than fathers reporting fair or good health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fathers' participation in healthcare was suboptimal. Identifying barriers impacting men's interactions with the healthcare system is essential to develop strategies to improve the overall health of fathers and families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"669-675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04090-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04090-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨具有国家代表性的父亲社会人口统计学特征、医疗保健利用和自我报告健康状况之间的关系。方法:在2018年10月至2019年7月期间,对佐治亚州857名父亲进行了妊娠风险评估监测系统试点研究。该研究对婴儿出生后2-6个月的父亲进行了调查,以评估围产期父亲的经历和行为。多变量逻辑回归检验了父亲特征与三个结果之间的关系:有初级保健医生(PCP)、有任何个人保健访问和自我报告的健康状况。结果:在266名受访者中,53.9%的人报告有PCP, 46.2%的人报告任何医疗保健访问,65.2%的人报告非常好或非常好。有保险的父亲更有可能患PCP (65.6% vs. 26.6%;调整患病率[aPR] = 2.47, 95% CI 1.41-4.33)和就诊(59.9% vs. 21.5%;aPR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.30-5.22)高于未投保的父亲。拥有大学或更高学历的父亲更有可能进行医疗保健访问(59.4% vs. 39.3%;aPR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.49),报告非常好或非常健康(79.1% vs. 52.2%;aPR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-1.98)比拥有高中文凭/GED或更低学历的父亲多。报告非常健康或非常健康的父亲更有可能患有PCP(59.9%对42.1%);aPR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.99)高于报告健康状况一般或良好的父亲。结论:父亲参与医疗保健是次优的。确定影响男性与医疗保健系统互动的障碍对于制定改善父亲和家庭整体健康的战略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paternal Health and Health Behaviors During the Perinatal Period: Results from a Representative Survey of Fathers in Georgia, 2018-2019.

Objectives: To investigate the associations between paternal sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare utilization and self-reported health status among a state-representative sample of fathers.

Methods: The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for Dads pilot study sampled 857 fathers in Georgia from October 2018-July 2019. It surveyed fathers 2-6 months after their infants' birth to assess paternal experiences and behaviors during the perinatal period. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between paternal characteristics and three outcomes: having a primary care physician (PCP), having any personal healthcare visit, and self-reported health status.

Results: Among 266 respondents, 53.9% reported having a PCP, 46.2% reported any healthcare visit, and 65.2% reported very good or excellent health. Insured fathers were more likely to have a PCP (65.6% vs. 26.6%; adjusted Prevalence Ratio [aPR] = 2.47, 95% CI 1.41-4.33) and a healthcare visit (59.9% vs. 21.5%; aPR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.30-5.22) than fathers who were uninsured. Fathers with a college degree or higher were more likely to have a healthcare visit (59.4% vs. % 39.3%; aPR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.49), and to report very good or excellent health (79.1% vs. % 52.2%; aPR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-1.98) than fathers with a high school diploma/GED or less. Fathers reporting very good or excellent health were more likely to have a PCP (59.9% vs. 42.1%); aPR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.99) than fathers reporting fair or good health.

Conclusions: Fathers' participation in healthcare was suboptimal. Identifying barriers impacting men's interactions with the healthcare system is essential to develop strategies to improve the overall health of fathers and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信