瑞典住院登记重症COVID-19患者重症监护、机械通气和体外膜氧合程序代码的外部审查:一项全国性观察性队列研究

Ebba Rosendal, Sebastian Kalucza, Helena Nyström, Matthias Schien, Ritva Kiiski Berggren, Hanna Jerndal, Osvaldo Fonseca-Rodriguez, Anne-Marie Fors Connolly
{"title":"瑞典住院登记重症COVID-19患者重症监护、机械通气和体外膜氧合程序代码的外部审查:一项全国性观察性队列研究","authors":"Ebba Rosendal, Sebastian Kalucza, Helena Nyström, Matthias Schien, Ritva Kiiski Berggren, Hanna Jerndal, Osvaldo Fonseca-Rodriguez, Anne-Marie Fors Connolly","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of registry data is important for epidemiological research. The Swedish inpatient registry (IPR) is a national database with mandatory registration of all hospitalisations since 1987, and since 2007, the medical procedure codes which can be used for grading severity of infectious diseases. However, the completeness of procedure code registration has rarely been studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the quality and completeness of procedure codes for ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the Swedish IPR utilising the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR) as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Swedish nationwide observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Covid-19 patients in Sweden who required intensive care in Sweden between March 2020 and August 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Covid-19 patients with a laboratory-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection who required ICU admission (<i>n</i> = 8992), mechanical ventilation (<i>n</i> = 5262) or ECMO (<i>n</i> = 29).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The sensitivity and/or positive predictive values of procedure code registration for ICU, mechanical ventilation, ECMO and Covid-19 diagnosis code registration in the IPR were evaluated using SIR as the reference. Factors associated with low reporting were explored and the dates of ICU admission registration compared between IPR and SIR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Covid-19 patients registered in SIR as needing intensive care, mechanical ventilation or ECMO, the completeness of procedure codes in the IPR was 39.7, 78.2 and 100%, respectively. Of the 39.7% with an ICU code in the IPR, the ICU date in the IPR corresponding to the actual ICU admission date was 52.3%. The completeness of ICU registration in the IPR varied from 0.6 to 96.9% between healthcare regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Procedure codes for intensive care in the Swedish IPR showed low sensitivity and varied greatly between healthcare regions. This negatively influences their usability for epidemiological research and calls for updated guidelines on coding.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"4 2","pages":"e0071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External review of procedure codes for intensive care, mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill COVID-19 patients in the Swedish inpatient register: A nationwide observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ebba Rosendal, Sebastian Kalucza, Helena Nyström, Matthias Schien, Ritva Kiiski Berggren, Hanna Jerndal, Osvaldo Fonseca-Rodriguez, Anne-Marie Fors Connolly\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of registry data is important for epidemiological research. The Swedish inpatient registry (IPR) is a national database with mandatory registration of all hospitalisations since 1987, and since 2007, the medical procedure codes which can be used for grading severity of infectious diseases. However, the completeness of procedure code registration has rarely been studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the quality and completeness of procedure codes for ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the Swedish IPR utilising the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR) as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A Swedish nationwide observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Covid-19 patients in Sweden who required intensive care in Sweden between March 2020 and August 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Covid-19 patients with a laboratory-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection who required ICU admission (<i>n</i> = 8992), mechanical ventilation (<i>n</i> = 5262) or ECMO (<i>n</i> = 29).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The sensitivity and/or positive predictive values of procedure code registration for ICU, mechanical ventilation, ECMO and Covid-19 diagnosis code registration in the IPR were evaluated using SIR as the reference. Factors associated with low reporting were explored and the dates of ICU admission registration compared between IPR and SIR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Covid-19 patients registered in SIR as needing intensive care, mechanical ventilation or ECMO, the completeness of procedure codes in the IPR was 39.7, 78.2 and 100%, respectively. Of the 39.7% with an ICU code in the IPR, the ICU date in the IPR corresponding to the actual ICU admission date was 52.3%. The completeness of ICU registration in the IPR varied from 0.6 to 96.9% between healthcare regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Procedure codes for intensive care in the Swedish IPR showed low sensitivity and varied greatly between healthcare regions. This negatively influences their usability for epidemiological research and calls for updated guidelines on coding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"e0071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:登记资料的质量对流行病学研究至关重要。瑞典住院病人登记处(IPR)是一个国家数据库,强制登记了自1987年以来的所有住院情况,并自2007年以来登记了可用于传染病严重程度分级的医疗程序代码。然而,对程序代码注册的完备性研究却很少。目的:以瑞典重症监护注册表(SIR)为金标准,确定瑞典IPR ICU入院、机械通气和体外膜氧合(ECMO)程序代码的质量和完整性。设计:一项瑞典全国性的观察性研究。背景:2020年3月至2022年8月期间在瑞典需要重症监护的瑞典Covid-19患者。患者:实验室证实的SARS-CoV-2感染的Covid-19患者,需要住院ICU (n = 8992),机械通气(n = 5262)或ECMO (n = 29)。主要观察指标:以SIR为参考,评价IPR中ICU、机械通气、ECMO和Covid-19诊断代码登记的敏感性和/或阳性预测值。结果:在SIR中登记为需要重症监护、机械通气或ECMO的Covid-19患者,IPR中程序代码的完整性分别为39.7%、78.2和100%。在39.7%的知识产权中有ICU代码的患者中,知识产权中的ICU日期与实际入住日期相对应的占52.3%。知识产权地区ICU注册的完成率从0.6%到96.9%不等。结论:瑞典IPR重症监护程序代码的敏感性较低,并且在医疗保健地区之间差异很大。这对它们在流行病学研究中的可用性产生了负面影响,并要求更新编码准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External review of procedure codes for intensive care, mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill COVID-19 patients in the Swedish inpatient register: A nationwide observational cohort study.

Background: The quality of registry data is important for epidemiological research. The Swedish inpatient registry (IPR) is a national database with mandatory registration of all hospitalisations since 1987, and since 2007, the medical procedure codes which can be used for grading severity of infectious diseases. However, the completeness of procedure code registration has rarely been studied.

Objectives: To determine the quality and completeness of procedure codes for ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the Swedish IPR utilising the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR) as the gold standard.

Design: A Swedish nationwide observational study.

Setting: Covid-19 patients in Sweden who required intensive care in Sweden between March 2020 and August 2022.

Patients: Covid-19 patients with a laboratory-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection who required ICU admission (n = 8992), mechanical ventilation (n = 5262) or ECMO (n = 29).

Main outcome measures: The sensitivity and/or positive predictive values of procedure code registration for ICU, mechanical ventilation, ECMO and Covid-19 diagnosis code registration in the IPR were evaluated using SIR as the reference. Factors associated with low reporting were explored and the dates of ICU admission registration compared between IPR and SIR.

Results: For Covid-19 patients registered in SIR as needing intensive care, mechanical ventilation or ECMO, the completeness of procedure codes in the IPR was 39.7, 78.2 and 100%, respectively. Of the 39.7% with an ICU code in the IPR, the ICU date in the IPR corresponding to the actual ICU admission date was 52.3%. The completeness of ICU registration in the IPR varied from 0.6 to 96.9% between healthcare regions.

Conclusions: Procedure codes for intensive care in the Swedish IPR showed low sensitivity and varied greatly between healthcare regions. This negatively influences their usability for epidemiological research and calls for updated guidelines on coding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信