Xia-Wei Zhang, Jing-Jing Yang, Ning LE, Yu-Jun Wei, Ya-Nan Wen, Nan Wang, Yi-Fan Jiao, Song-Hua Luan, Li-Ping Dou, Chun-Ji Gao
{"title":"[地西他滨为基础的清骨髓预处理方案在急性髓系白血病患者异基因造血干细胞移植中的疗效和安全性]。","authors":"Xia-Wei Zhang, Jing-Jing Yang, Ning LE, Yu-Jun Wei, Ya-Nan Wen, Nan Wang, Yi-Fan Jiao, Song-Hua Luan, Li-Ping Dou, Chun-Ji Gao","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.02.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and safety of decitabine-based myeloablative preconditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical characteristics and efficacy of 115 AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from August 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 37 patients treated with decitabine conditioning regimen (decitabine group) and 78 patients without decitabine conditioning regimen (non-decitabine group). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the patients in first complete remission (CR1) state before allo-HSCT, the 1-year relapse rates of decitabine group(22 cases) and non-decitabine group(69 cases) were 9.1% and 29.6%, respectively, the difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i> =0.042). The 1-year cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in decitabine group and non-decitabine group was 62.2% and 70.5%, respectively, and the 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic inhibitor-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 18.9% and 14.1%, respectively, there were no significant differences in the incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD between the two groups (<i>P</i> >0.05). Of the 115 patients, there were no significantly differences in the 1-year CIR(21.7% <i>vs</i> 28.8%, <i>P</i> =0.866), NRM(10.9% <i>vs</i> 3.9%, <i>P</i> =0.203), OS(75.2% <i>vs</i> 83.8%, <i>P</i> =0.131) and LFS(74.6% <i>vs</i> 69.1%, <i>P</i> =0.912) between the decitabine group(37 cases) and the non-decitabine group(78 cases).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decitabine-based conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse rate of AML CR1 patients with good safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":"33 2","pages":"557-564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine-Based Myeloablative Preconditioning Regimen for allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].\",\"authors\":\"Xia-Wei Zhang, Jing-Jing Yang, Ning LE, Yu-Jun Wei, Ya-Nan Wen, Nan Wang, Yi-Fan Jiao, Song-Hua Luan, Li-Ping Dou, Chun-Ji Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.02.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and safety of decitabine-based myeloablative preconditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical characteristics and efficacy of 115 AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from August 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 37 patients treated with decitabine conditioning regimen (decitabine group) and 78 patients without decitabine conditioning regimen (non-decitabine group). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the patients in first complete remission (CR1) state before allo-HSCT, the 1-year relapse rates of decitabine group(22 cases) and non-decitabine group(69 cases) were 9.1% and 29.6%, respectively, the difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i> =0.042). The 1-year cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in decitabine group and non-decitabine group was 62.2% and 70.5%, respectively, and the 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic inhibitor-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 18.9% and 14.1%, respectively, there were no significant differences in the incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD between the two groups (<i>P</i> >0.05). Of the 115 patients, there were no significantly differences in the 1-year CIR(21.7% <i>vs</i> 28.8%, <i>P</i> =0.866), NRM(10.9% <i>vs</i> 3.9%, <i>P</i> =0.203), OS(75.2% <i>vs</i> 83.8%, <i>P</i> =0.131) and LFS(74.6% <i>vs</i> 69.1%, <i>P</i> =0.912) between the decitabine group(37 cases) and the non-decitabine group(78 cases).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decitabine-based conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse rate of AML CR1 patients with good safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国实验血液学杂志\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"557-564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国实验血液学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.02.037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.02.037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:分析以地西他滨为基础的清髓预处理方案在急性髓系白血病(AML)患者异基因造血干细胞移植(alloc - hsct)中的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2018年8月至2022年8月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医疗中心行同种异体造血干细胞移植的115例AML患者的临床特点和疗效,其中采用地西他滨调节方案的患者37例(地西他滨组),不采用地西他滨调节方案的患者78例(非地西他滨组)。分析累积复发率(CIR)、总生存期(OS)、无白血病生存期(LFS)、非复发死亡率(NRM)和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)。结果:异位造血干细胞移植前首次完全缓解(CR1)状态患者,地西他滨组(22例)和非地西他滨组(69例)1年复发率分别为9.1%和29.6%,差异有统计学意义(P =0.042)。地西他滨组和非地西他滨组急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)的1年累积发病率分别为62.2%和70.5%,慢性抑制剂抗宿主病(cGVHD)的1年累积发病率分别为18.9%和14.1%,两组间aGVHD和cGVHD的发病率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。115例患者中,地西他滨组(37例)与非地西他滨组(78例)在1年CIR(21.7% vs 28.8%, P =0.866)、NRM(10.9% vs 3.9%, P =0.203)、OS(75.2% vs 83.8%, P =0.131)和LFS(74.6% vs 69.1%, P =0.912)方面无显著差异。结论:地西他滨为基础的调节方案可降低AML CR1患者的复发率,且安全性较好。
[Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine-Based Myeloablative Preconditioning Regimen for allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of decitabine-based myeloablative preconditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Methods: The clinical characteristics and efficacy of 115 AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from August 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 37 patients treated with decitabine conditioning regimen (decitabine group) and 78 patients without decitabine conditioning regimen (non-decitabine group). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) were analyzed.
Results: For the patients in first complete remission (CR1) state before allo-HSCT, the 1-year relapse rates of decitabine group(22 cases) and non-decitabine group(69 cases) were 9.1% and 29.6%, respectively, the difference was statistically significant(P =0.042). The 1-year cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in decitabine group and non-decitabine group was 62.2% and 70.5%, respectively, and the 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic inhibitor-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 18.9% and 14.1%, respectively, there were no significant differences in the incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD between the two groups (P >0.05). Of the 115 patients, there were no significantly differences in the 1-year CIR(21.7% vs 28.8%, P =0.866), NRM(10.9% vs 3.9%, P =0.203), OS(75.2% vs 83.8%, P =0.131) and LFS(74.6% vs 69.1%, P =0.912) between the decitabine group(37 cases) and the non-decitabine group(78 cases).
Conclusion: Decitabine-based conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse rate of AML CR1 patients with good safety.