承德市交通集约影响下典型钒钛磁铁矿矿区土壤重金属来源解析及生态风险[j]。

Q2 Environmental Science
Hou-Yun Sun, Feng Ma, Zi-Ran Chen, Xi Zhu, Xiao-Feng Wei
{"title":"承德市交通集约影响下典型钒钛磁铁矿矿区土壤重金属来源解析及生态风险[j]。","authors":"Hou-Yun Sun, Feng Ma, Zi-Ran Chen, Xi Zhu, Xiao-Feng Wei","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202404138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 895 surface soil samples (0-20 cm) and five road-dust samples were collected in a typical vanadium-titanium magnetite mining area of Hongqi-Damiao catchment in the Chengde City and analyzed for 12 heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, Hg, V, Ti, Mn, As, and Co) and their chemical speciation. The accumulation and ecological risk characteristics of soil heavy metals (HMs) were clarified by geological accumulative index, potential ecological risk index (RI), risk assessment coding (RAC), and modified Nemerow integrated ecological risk index (mNIER). Multiple statistical methods including principal component analysis, correlation analysis, cluster analysis, redundancy analysis, and GIS spatial analysis were used to investigate the spatial variation response of soil HMs to the environmental impact factors (distance to the road network, land use, and soil parent material types). The sources of HMs were quantitatively analyzed using a positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The results showed that the over-standard rates of Cu, Cr, Cd, Ni, Pb, and Zn were 5.70%, 2.79%, 1.01%, 0.67%, 0.11%, and 0.11%, respectively, in comparison to China's soil environmental quality standard risk screening values (GB15618-2018). The average accumulation index of soil HMs followed the order of Cu&gt;Ti&gt;Cr&gt;V&gt;Co&gt;Ni&gt;Cd&gt;Zn&gt;Mn&gt;As&gt;Hg&gt;Pb, while the average accumulation index of Cu was 1.23 and categorized as moderate accumulation. The accumulation of Cu, Zn, Cr, Mn, V, Ti, Co, and Ni gradually decreased within a distance of 200 m, while the content of Cd in soil was relatively stable within the distance from 25 m to 800 m to the road network, and the accumulation index of Pb, Hg, and As in soil was highest at the 200 m buffer zone. The average RAC value of 12 HMs followed the order of Cd&gt;Mn&gt;Ni&gt;Zn&gt;Hg&gt;Co&gt;Pb&gt;Cu&gt;As&gt;Cr&gt;V&gt;Ti. The average RAC value of the Cd element was 46.45%, showing high biological activity, while the bioavailability RAC value of other elements was generally categorized as low-risk or risk-free level. The potential ecological risk of HMs in soil was relatively low with the RI value range between 51.48 to 1 152.39 (average of 131.2) and the mNIER value range between 10.32 to 745.57, with an average value of 32.85, in which 97.43% of the samples were classified as light to moderate risk. Based on the PMF model, 44.82%, 33.45%, 32.27%, and 24.35% of Pb, Hg, Cd, and Zn in surface soil were contributed by intensive transportation activities, respectively. The main sources of 12 HMs in the study area were the combined sources of natural sources (soil parent materials), weathering sources of V-Ti-Fe-P deposits, dust deposition from industrial and mining activities and coal combustion, agricultural sources, and traffic sources, with their contribution rates of 27.46%, 21.12%, 19.29%, 17.05%, and 15.08%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 4","pages":"2486-2500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Source Apportionment and Ecological Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Typical Vanadium-titanium Magnetite Mining Areas Affected by Intensive Transportation Activities in Chengde].\",\"authors\":\"Hou-Yun Sun, Feng Ma, Zi-Ran Chen, Xi Zhu, Xiao-Feng Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202404138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A total of 895 surface soil samples (0-20 cm) and five road-dust samples were collected in a typical vanadium-titanium magnetite mining area of Hongqi-Damiao catchment in the Chengde City and analyzed for 12 heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, Hg, V, Ti, Mn, As, and Co) and their chemical speciation. The accumulation and ecological risk characteristics of soil heavy metals (HMs) were clarified by geological accumulative index, potential ecological risk index (RI), risk assessment coding (RAC), and modified Nemerow integrated ecological risk index (mNIER). Multiple statistical methods including principal component analysis, correlation analysis, cluster analysis, redundancy analysis, and GIS spatial analysis were used to investigate the spatial variation response of soil HMs to the environmental impact factors (distance to the road network, land use, and soil parent material types). The sources of HMs were quantitatively analyzed using a positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The results showed that the over-standard rates of Cu, Cr, Cd, Ni, Pb, and Zn were 5.70%, 2.79%, 1.01%, 0.67%, 0.11%, and 0.11%, respectively, in comparison to China's soil environmental quality standard risk screening values (GB15618-2018). The average accumulation index of soil HMs followed the order of Cu&gt;Ti&gt;Cr&gt;V&gt;Co&gt;Ni&gt;Cd&gt;Zn&gt;Mn&gt;As&gt;Hg&gt;Pb, while the average accumulation index of Cu was 1.23 and categorized as moderate accumulation. The accumulation of Cu, Zn, Cr, Mn, V, Ti, Co, and Ni gradually decreased within a distance of 200 m, while the content of Cd in soil was relatively stable within the distance from 25 m to 800 m to the road network, and the accumulation index of Pb, Hg, and As in soil was highest at the 200 m buffer zone. The average RAC value of 12 HMs followed the order of Cd&gt;Mn&gt;Ni&gt;Zn&gt;Hg&gt;Co&gt;Pb&gt;Cu&gt;As&gt;Cr&gt;V&gt;Ti. The average RAC value of the Cd element was 46.45%, showing high biological activity, while the bioavailability RAC value of other elements was generally categorized as low-risk or risk-free level. The potential ecological risk of HMs in soil was relatively low with the RI value range between 51.48 to 1 152.39 (average of 131.2) and the mNIER value range between 10.32 to 745.57, with an average value of 32.85, in which 97.43% of the samples were classified as light to moderate risk. Based on the PMF model, 44.82%, 33.45%, 32.27%, and 24.35% of Pb, Hg, Cd, and Zn in surface soil were contributed by intensive transportation activities, respectively. The main sources of 12 HMs in the study area were the combined sources of natural sources (soil parent materials), weathering sources of V-Ti-Fe-P deposits, dust deposition from industrial and mining activities and coal combustion, agricultural sources, and traffic sources, with their contribution rates of 27.46%, 21.12%, 19.29%, 17.05%, and 15.08%, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"2486-2500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202404138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202404138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在承德市红旗—大庙流域典型钒钛磁铁矿矿区,采集了895份表层土壤样品(0 ~ 20 cm)和5份道路粉尘样品,分析了12种重金属(Cu、Ni、Cd、Cr、Pb、Zn、Hg、V、Ti、Mn、As、Co)及其化学形态。采用地质累积指数、潜在生态风险指数、风险评价编码、修正Nemerow综合生态风险指数等方法,明确了土壤重金属(hm)的累积特征和生态风险特征。采用主成分分析、相关分析、聚类分析、冗余分析和GIS空间分析等多种统计方法,探讨了土壤HMs对环境影响因子(与路网距离、土地利用方式和土壤母质类型)的空间变异响应。采用正矩阵分解(PMF)模型定量分析了HMs的来源。结果表明,与中国土壤环境质量标准风险筛选值(GB15618-2018)相比,Cu、Cr、Cd、Ni、Pb和Zn的超标率分别为5.70%、2.79%、1.01%、0.67%、0.11%和0.11%。土壤hm的平均积累指数依次为Cu>;Ti>Cr>V>Co>Ni>Cd>Zn>Mn>As>Hg>Pb, Cu的平均积累指数为1.23,属于中等积累。在距路网200 m范围内,Cu、Zn、Cr、Mn、V、Ti、Co、Ni的累积量逐渐减少,Cd在距路网25 ~ 800 m范围内相对稳定,Pb、Hg、As在距路网200 m缓冲区处的累积指数最高。12个hm的平均RAC值依次为Cd>;Mn>Ni>Zn>Hg>Co>Pb>Cu>As>Cr>V>Ti。Cd元素的平均RAC值为46.45%,具有较高的生物活性,而其他元素的生物利用度RAC值一般为低风险或无风险水平。土壤微生物潜在生态风险较低,RI值为51.48 ~ 1 152.39(平均为131.2),mNIER值为10.32 ~ 745.57(平均为32.85),其中97.43%的样本属于轻至中度风险。基于PMF模型,表层土壤中Pb、Hg、Cd和Zn的贡献分别为44.82%、33.45%、32.27%和24.35%。研究区12个HMs的主要来源为自然源(土壤母质)、V-Ti-Fe-P沉积物风化源、工矿和燃煤扬尘、农业源和交通源的组合源,贡献率分别为27.46%、21.12%、19.29%、17.05%和15.08%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Source Apportionment and Ecological Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Typical Vanadium-titanium Magnetite Mining Areas Affected by Intensive Transportation Activities in Chengde].

A total of 895 surface soil samples (0-20 cm) and five road-dust samples were collected in a typical vanadium-titanium magnetite mining area of Hongqi-Damiao catchment in the Chengde City and analyzed for 12 heavy metals (Cu, Ni, Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn, Hg, V, Ti, Mn, As, and Co) and their chemical speciation. The accumulation and ecological risk characteristics of soil heavy metals (HMs) were clarified by geological accumulative index, potential ecological risk index (RI), risk assessment coding (RAC), and modified Nemerow integrated ecological risk index (mNIER). Multiple statistical methods including principal component analysis, correlation analysis, cluster analysis, redundancy analysis, and GIS spatial analysis were used to investigate the spatial variation response of soil HMs to the environmental impact factors (distance to the road network, land use, and soil parent material types). The sources of HMs were quantitatively analyzed using a positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. The results showed that the over-standard rates of Cu, Cr, Cd, Ni, Pb, and Zn were 5.70%, 2.79%, 1.01%, 0.67%, 0.11%, and 0.11%, respectively, in comparison to China's soil environmental quality standard risk screening values (GB15618-2018). The average accumulation index of soil HMs followed the order of Cu>Ti>Cr>V>Co>Ni>Cd>Zn>Mn>As>Hg>Pb, while the average accumulation index of Cu was 1.23 and categorized as moderate accumulation. The accumulation of Cu, Zn, Cr, Mn, V, Ti, Co, and Ni gradually decreased within a distance of 200 m, while the content of Cd in soil was relatively stable within the distance from 25 m to 800 m to the road network, and the accumulation index of Pb, Hg, and As in soil was highest at the 200 m buffer zone. The average RAC value of 12 HMs followed the order of Cd>Mn>Ni>Zn>Hg>Co>Pb>Cu>As>Cr>V>Ti. The average RAC value of the Cd element was 46.45%, showing high biological activity, while the bioavailability RAC value of other elements was generally categorized as low-risk or risk-free level. The potential ecological risk of HMs in soil was relatively low with the RI value range between 51.48 to 1 152.39 (average of 131.2) and the mNIER value range between 10.32 to 745.57, with an average value of 32.85, in which 97.43% of the samples were classified as light to moderate risk. Based on the PMF model, 44.82%, 33.45%, 32.27%, and 24.35% of Pb, Hg, Cd, and Zn in surface soil were contributed by intensive transportation activities, respectively. The main sources of 12 HMs in the study area were the combined sources of natural sources (soil parent materials), weathering sources of V-Ti-Fe-P deposits, dust deposition from industrial and mining activities and coal combustion, agricultural sources, and traffic sources, with their contribution rates of 27.46%, 21.12%, 19.29%, 17.05%, and 15.08%, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信