一份简短的医疗保险能力问卷:信度与效度。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Emily Langston, Neil Charness, Walter Boot
{"title":"一份简短的医疗保险能力问卷:信度与效度。","authors":"Emily Langston, Neil Charness, Walter Boot","doi":"10.1177/07334648251334413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study explores the reliability and validity of a newly developed 15-item Medicare proficiency questionnaire (MPQ) across a mixed group of participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare. The MPQ was designed to assess beneficiary knowledge across a variety of Medicare topics and was developed by combining questions selected from the 2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and updating it with researcher-generated Medicare Part D questions. During the month of February in 2024, participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare, which were recruited on Prolific, completed online surveys which included the MPQ and demographic questions. We found that the MPQ has adequate internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's alpha = .73 across participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare as well as adequate validity, as demonstrated by positive relationships of MPQ scores to education level and to enrollment status (enrollees scoring higher).</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648251334413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Short Medicare Proficiency Questionnaire (MPQ): Reliability and Validity.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Langston, Neil Charness, Walter Boot\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07334648251334413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study explores the reliability and validity of a newly developed 15-item Medicare proficiency questionnaire (MPQ) across a mixed group of participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare. The MPQ was designed to assess beneficiary knowledge across a variety of Medicare topics and was developed by combining questions selected from the 2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and updating it with researcher-generated Medicare Part D questions. During the month of February in 2024, participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare, which were recruited on Prolific, completed online surveys which included the MPQ and demographic questions. We found that the MPQ has adequate internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's alpha = .73 across participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare as well as adequate validity, as demonstrated by positive relationships of MPQ scores to education level and to enrollment status (enrollees scoring higher).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7334648251334413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251334413\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251334413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本横断面研究探讨了新开发的15项医疗保险熟练程度问卷(MPQ)在混合组参加和未参加医疗保险的参与者中的信度和效度。MPQ旨在评估受益人对各种医疗保险主题的了解,并结合从2003年医疗保险当前受益人调查中选择的问题,并与研究人员生成的医疗保险D部分问题进行更新。2024年2月,在多产网站上招募的参加和未参加医疗保险的参与者完成了包括MPQ和人口统计问题在内的在线调查。我们发现MPQ具有足够的内部一致性信度,在参加和未参加医疗保险的参与者中,Cronbach's alpha = .73,并且具有足够的效度,MPQ分数与教育水平和注册状态(注册者得分更高)呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Short Medicare Proficiency Questionnaire (MPQ): Reliability and Validity.

This cross-sectional study explores the reliability and validity of a newly developed 15-item Medicare proficiency questionnaire (MPQ) across a mixed group of participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare. The MPQ was designed to assess beneficiary knowledge across a variety of Medicare topics and was developed by combining questions selected from the 2003 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and updating it with researcher-generated Medicare Part D questions. During the month of February in 2024, participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare, which were recruited on Prolific, completed online surveys which included the MPQ and demographic questions. We found that the MPQ has adequate internal consistency reliability with Cronbach's alpha = .73 across participants enrolled and unenrolled in Medicare as well as adequate validity, as demonstrated by positive relationships of MPQ scores to education level and to enrollment status (enrollees scoring higher).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信