Mark T Miedel, Mahboubeh Varmazyad, Mengying Xia, Maria Mori Brooks, Dillon C Gavlock, Celeste Reese, Jaideep Behari, Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez, Albert Gough, D Lansing Taylor, Mark E Schurdak
{"title":"验证用于解释患者异质性的微生理系统需要可靠的可重复性分析和实验元数据。","authors":"Mark T Miedel, Mahboubeh Varmazyad, Mengying Xia, Maria Mori Brooks, Dillon C Gavlock, Celeste Reese, Jaideep Behari, Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez, Albert Gough, D Lansing Taylor, Mark E Schurdak","doi":"10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multi-cell-type, 3D microphysiological systems (MPS) that recapitulate normal organ/organ system functions and the progression of diseases are being applied in drug discovery and development programs to enable precision medicine. A critical step for this application is to demonstrate the reproducibility of the MPS and its ability to identify biologic/clinical heterogeneity from experimental variability, which requires capturing detailed metadata associated with MPS studies as well as a strong analytical approach for assessing reproducibility. Detailed metadata ensure that identical study parameters are being compared when evaluating reproducibility. We have developed the Pittsburgh reproducibility protocol (PReP), which uses a set of common statistical metrics, the coefficient of variation (CV), ANOVA, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), in a pipeline as a standard approach to evaluate the intra- and interstudy reproducibility of MPS performance. The PReP can be employed to identify biological/clinical heterogeneity relevant to precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":29773,"journal":{"name":"Cell Reports Methods","volume":"5 4","pages":"101028"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of microphysiological systems for interpreting patient heterogeneity requires robust reproducibility analytics and experimental metadata.\",\"authors\":\"Mark T Miedel, Mahboubeh Varmazyad, Mengying Xia, Maria Mori Brooks, Dillon C Gavlock, Celeste Reese, Jaideep Behari, Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez, Albert Gough, D Lansing Taylor, Mark E Schurdak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multi-cell-type, 3D microphysiological systems (MPS) that recapitulate normal organ/organ system functions and the progression of diseases are being applied in drug discovery and development programs to enable precision medicine. A critical step for this application is to demonstrate the reproducibility of the MPS and its ability to identify biologic/clinical heterogeneity from experimental variability, which requires capturing detailed metadata associated with MPS studies as well as a strong analytical approach for assessing reproducibility. Detailed metadata ensure that identical study parameters are being compared when evaluating reproducibility. We have developed the Pittsburgh reproducibility protocol (PReP), which uses a set of common statistical metrics, the coefficient of variation (CV), ANOVA, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), in a pipeline as a standard approach to evaluate the intra- and interstudy reproducibility of MPS performance. The PReP can be employed to identify biological/clinical heterogeneity relevant to precision medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Reports Methods\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"101028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Reports Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Reports Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of microphysiological systems for interpreting patient heterogeneity requires robust reproducibility analytics and experimental metadata.
Multi-cell-type, 3D microphysiological systems (MPS) that recapitulate normal organ/organ system functions and the progression of diseases are being applied in drug discovery and development programs to enable precision medicine. A critical step for this application is to demonstrate the reproducibility of the MPS and its ability to identify biologic/clinical heterogeneity from experimental variability, which requires capturing detailed metadata associated with MPS studies as well as a strong analytical approach for assessing reproducibility. Detailed metadata ensure that identical study parameters are being compared when evaluating reproducibility. We have developed the Pittsburgh reproducibility protocol (PReP), which uses a set of common statistical metrics, the coefficient of variation (CV), ANOVA, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), in a pipeline as a standard approach to evaluate the intra- and interstudy reproducibility of MPS performance. The PReP can be employed to identify biological/clinical heterogeneity relevant to precision medicine.