【柔性骨水泥输送器不同穿刺方法治疗骨质疏松性椎体上1/3压缩性骨折的疗效比较研究】。

Q3 Medicine
Tangbo Li, Kun Liu, Nan Zhang, Guobing Hao, Zexing Zhu, Lin Qiao, Diyu Song
{"title":"【柔性骨水泥输送器不同穿刺方法治疗骨质疏松性椎体上1/3压缩性骨折的疗效比较研究】。","authors":"Tangbo Li, Kun Liu, Nan Zhang, Guobing Hao, Zexing Zhu, Lin Qiao, Diyu Song","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202412072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of different puncture methods of the flexible bone cement delivery device in unilateral percutaneous curved vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 67 patients with osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures who were admitted and met the selection criteria between January 2023 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the puncture method of the flexible bone cement delivery device: the oblique puncture group ( <i>n</i>=37) and the parallel puncture group ( <i>n</i>=30). There was no significant difference ( <i>P</i>>0.05) between the two groups in terms of gender, age, bone mineral density (T value), distribution of fractured vertebrae, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), anterior vertebral height of the fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: operation time, incidence of secondary puncture, incidence of bone cement leakage, volume of injected bone cement, bone cement distribution score, as well as VAS score, ODI, anterior vertebral height of the fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra at 1 day after operation and at last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two cases in the oblique puncture group and 7 cases in the parallel puncture group underwent secondary puncture during operation, and the difference in the incidence of secondary puncture was significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). No complications such as bone cement hypersensitivity, bone cement embolism, nerve injury, or epidural hematoma occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in operation time, volume of injected bone cement, incidence of bone cement leakage, distribution score and rating of bone cement between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 12.0 months), and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). No further fracture collapse or compression occurred in the fractured vertebra during follow-up. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS score, ODI, anterior vertebral height, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra after operation compared to baseline ( <i>P</i><0.05). There were also significant differences between the two time points after operation ( <i>P</i><0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures treated with unilateral percutaneous curved vertebroplasty, both oblique and parallel puncture methods of the flexible bone cement delivery device can effectively relieve pain, but the former is more conducive to reducing the incidence of secondary puncture.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 4","pages":"470-477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparative study on effectiveness of different puncture methods of flexible bone cement delivery device in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures].\",\"authors\":\"Tangbo Li, Kun Liu, Nan Zhang, Guobing Hao, Zexing Zhu, Lin Qiao, Diyu Song\",\"doi\":\"10.7507/1002-1892.202412072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of different puncture methods of the flexible bone cement delivery device in unilateral percutaneous curved vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 67 patients with osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures who were admitted and met the selection criteria between January 2023 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the puncture method of the flexible bone cement delivery device: the oblique puncture group ( <i>n</i>=37) and the parallel puncture group ( <i>n</i>=30). There was no significant difference ( <i>P</i>>0.05) between the two groups in terms of gender, age, bone mineral density (T value), distribution of fractured vertebrae, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), anterior vertebral height of the fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: operation time, incidence of secondary puncture, incidence of bone cement leakage, volume of injected bone cement, bone cement distribution score, as well as VAS score, ODI, anterior vertebral height of the fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra at 1 day after operation and at last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two cases in the oblique puncture group and 7 cases in the parallel puncture group underwent secondary puncture during operation, and the difference in the incidence of secondary puncture was significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). No complications such as bone cement hypersensitivity, bone cement embolism, nerve injury, or epidural hematoma occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in operation time, volume of injected bone cement, incidence of bone cement leakage, distribution score and rating of bone cement between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 12.0 months), and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). No further fracture collapse or compression occurred in the fractured vertebra during follow-up. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS score, ODI, anterior vertebral height, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra after operation compared to baseline ( <i>P</i><0.05). There were also significant differences between the two time points after operation ( <i>P</i><0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures treated with unilateral percutaneous curved vertebroplasty, both oblique and parallel puncture methods of the flexible bone cement delivery device can effectively relieve pain, but the former is more conducive to reducing the incidence of secondary puncture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"470-477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202412072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202412072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较柔性骨水泥输送装置不同穿刺方法在单侧经皮椎体弯曲成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体上1/3压缩性骨折中的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年4月67例符合入选标准的骨质疏松性椎体上1/3压缩性骨折患者的临床资料。根据柔性骨水泥输送装置的穿刺方式将患者分为两组:斜穿刺组(n=37)和平行穿刺组(n=30)。两组患者在性别、年龄、骨密度(T值)、骨折椎体分布、损伤至手术时间、术前疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry失能指数(ODI)、骨折椎体前高度、骨折椎体Cobb角等方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组手术时间、二次穿刺发生率、骨水泥漏出发生率、骨水泥注射体积、骨水泥分布评分、术后1 d及最后随访时VAS评分、ODI、骨折椎体前段高度、骨折椎体Cobb角。结果:术中斜置穿刺组2例,平行穿刺组7例进行二次穿刺,两组间二次穿刺发生率差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所有患者均随访6 ~ 18个月(平均12.0个月),两组随访时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。随访期间,骨折椎体未发生进一步骨折塌陷或压迫。两组术后VAS评分、ODI、椎体前高度、骨折椎体Cobb角较基线均有显著改善(PPP>0.05)。结论:单侧经皮椎体弯曲成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体上1/3压缩性骨折时,柔性骨水泥输送装置斜平行穿刺均能有效缓解疼痛,但斜平行穿刺更有利于减少二次穿刺的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparative study on effectiveness of different puncture methods of flexible bone cement delivery device in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of different puncture methods of the flexible bone cement delivery device in unilateral percutaneous curved vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 67 patients with osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures who were admitted and met the selection criteria between January 2023 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the puncture method of the flexible bone cement delivery device: the oblique puncture group ( n=37) and the parallel puncture group ( n=30). There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) between the two groups in terms of gender, age, bone mineral density (T value), distribution of fractured vertebrae, time from injury to operation, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), anterior vertebral height of the fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: operation time, incidence of secondary puncture, incidence of bone cement leakage, volume of injected bone cement, bone cement distribution score, as well as VAS score, ODI, anterior vertebral height of the fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra at 1 day after operation and at last follow-up.

Results: Two cases in the oblique puncture group and 7 cases in the parallel puncture group underwent secondary puncture during operation, and the difference in the incidence of secondary puncture was significant ( P<0.05). No complications such as bone cement hypersensitivity, bone cement embolism, nerve injury, or epidural hematoma occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in operation time, volume of injected bone cement, incidence of bone cement leakage, distribution score and rating of bone cement between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 12.0 months), and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). No further fracture collapse or compression occurred in the fractured vertebra during follow-up. Both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS score, ODI, anterior vertebral height, and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebra after operation compared to baseline ( P<0.05). There were also significant differences between the two time points after operation ( P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: For osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures treated with unilateral percutaneous curved vertebroplasty, both oblique and parallel puncture methods of the flexible bone cement delivery device can effectively relieve pain, but the former is more conducive to reducing the incidence of secondary puncture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信