一家社区医院急性疼痛阿片类药物短缺期间住院患者纳布啡替代:回顾性回顾。

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kathryn M Storm, Amanda Mullins, Christopher M Herndon
{"title":"一家社区医院急性疼痛阿片类药物短缺期间住院患者纳布啡替代:回顾性回顾。","authors":"Kathryn M Storm, Amanda Mullins, Christopher M Herndon","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2491698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nalbuphine's mixed agonist-antagonist activity has historically limited use. This study evaluated the impact of utilizing nalbuphine during admission during a parenteral opioid shortage. A single-center retrospective chart review was performed between January 2018 and June 2018 to compare outcomes between those who received nalbuphine and those who received morphine. The primary outcome was average pain score during admission. Secondary outcomes included: change in parenteral opioid, change in dose, and opioid prescription at discharge. In total, 138 patients, 47 in the nalbuphine group and 91 in the morphine group, were included. Average pain score during admission was 3.97 and 4.13 for nalbuphine and morphine, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.695). There was no statistically significant change in average pain control on day 1, 2, or last day between groups. In opioid-tolerant patients who inadvertently received nalbuphine, average pain scores were higher compared to the nalbuphine opioid-naïve group, admission (<i>p</i> = 0.003), day 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), day 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.016), and last day (<i>p</i> = 0.007). No differences were observed based on sex. No difference in pain scores was observed. Nalbuphine resulted in less pain control in opioid-tolerant patients. Nalbuphine may represent an alternative first-line parenteral opioid in the acute care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"332-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient Nalbuphine Substitution During Intravenous IV Opioid Shortage for Acute Pain in a Community Hospital: A Retrospective Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn M Storm, Amanda Mullins, Christopher M Herndon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15360288.2025.2491698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nalbuphine's mixed agonist-antagonist activity has historically limited use. This study evaluated the impact of utilizing nalbuphine during admission during a parenteral opioid shortage. A single-center retrospective chart review was performed between January 2018 and June 2018 to compare outcomes between those who received nalbuphine and those who received morphine. The primary outcome was average pain score during admission. Secondary outcomes included: change in parenteral opioid, change in dose, and opioid prescription at discharge. In total, 138 patients, 47 in the nalbuphine group and 91 in the morphine group, were included. Average pain score during admission was 3.97 and 4.13 for nalbuphine and morphine, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.695). There was no statistically significant change in average pain control on day 1, 2, or last day between groups. In opioid-tolerant patients who inadvertently received nalbuphine, average pain scores were higher compared to the nalbuphine opioid-naïve group, admission (<i>p</i> = 0.003), day 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), day 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.016), and last day (<i>p</i> = 0.007). No differences were observed based on sex. No difference in pain scores was observed. Nalbuphine resulted in less pain control in opioid-tolerant patients. Nalbuphine may represent an alternative first-line parenteral opioid in the acute care setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2491698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2491698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳布芬的激动-拮抗剂混合活性在历史上使用有限。本研究评估了在肠外阿片类药物短缺期间入院时使用纳布啡的影响。在2018年1月至2018年6月期间进行了单中心回顾性图表回顾,以比较接受纳布啡和接受吗啡的患者的结果。主要结局为入院时的平均疼痛评分。次要结局包括:肠外阿片类药物的变化、剂量的变化和出院时阿片类药物的处方。共纳入138例患者,其中纳布啡组47例,吗啡组91例。纳布啡组和吗啡组入院时平均疼痛评分分别为3.97分和4.13分(p = 0.695)。在第1天、第2天或最后一天,组间的平均疼痛控制没有统计学上的显著变化。在无意中服用纳布啡的阿片类药物耐受患者中,平均疼痛评分高于纳布啡opioid-naïve组、入院(p = 0.003)、第1天(p = 0.016)和最后一天(p = 0.007)。没有观察到基于性别的差异。疼痛评分无差异。在阿片类药物耐受患者中,纳布芬导致疼痛控制较差。在急性护理环境中,纳布芬可能是一种替代的一线静脉注射阿片类药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inpatient Nalbuphine Substitution During Intravenous IV Opioid Shortage for Acute Pain in a Community Hospital: A Retrospective Review.

Nalbuphine's mixed agonist-antagonist activity has historically limited use. This study evaluated the impact of utilizing nalbuphine during admission during a parenteral opioid shortage. A single-center retrospective chart review was performed between January 2018 and June 2018 to compare outcomes between those who received nalbuphine and those who received morphine. The primary outcome was average pain score during admission. Secondary outcomes included: change in parenteral opioid, change in dose, and opioid prescription at discharge. In total, 138 patients, 47 in the nalbuphine group and 91 in the morphine group, were included. Average pain score during admission was 3.97 and 4.13 for nalbuphine and morphine, respectively (p = 0.695). There was no statistically significant change in average pain control on day 1, 2, or last day between groups. In opioid-tolerant patients who inadvertently received nalbuphine, average pain scores were higher compared to the nalbuphine opioid-naïve group, admission (p = 0.003), day 1 (p < 0.001), day 2 (p = 0.016), and last day (p = 0.007). No differences were observed based on sex. No difference in pain scores was observed. Nalbuphine resulted in less pain control in opioid-tolerant patients. Nalbuphine may represent an alternative first-line parenteral opioid in the acute care setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信