玻璃体切除术后糖尿病患者角膜上皮缺损的研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/8873950
Kristin Ates Hicks, Yujia Zhou, Jay Talati, Khushi Saigal, Joshua Kalish, Shivani Shah, Siva Iyer, Lauren Jeang
{"title":"玻璃体切除术后糖尿病患者角膜上皮缺损的研究。","authors":"Kristin Ates Hicks, Yujia Zhou, Jay Talati, Khushi Saigal, Joshua Kalish, Shivani Shah, Siva Iyer, Lauren Jeang","doi":"10.1155/joph/8873950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus is a known risk factor for corneal epithelial defects (CEDs) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), but it is unclear if diabetes severity or specific diabetic risk factors are associated with an increased risk of CED. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to identify factors associated with CED and healing time in association with diabetes severity in diabetic patients following PPV. The electronic health record database at University of Florida in Gainesville was queried to identify patients who underwent PPV for retinal detachment (RD) between April 2016 and April 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical data including type of diabetes (if present), diabetes duration and severity, and associated diabetic comorbidities. The main outcome measures included presence of a CED within one month postoperatively, treatment of CED if present, and CED healing time. A total of 637 patients were analyzed, with a total of 243 eyes (26.5%) that belonged to diabetic patients. The diabetic patients were further separated into a proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group and a nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) group. Diabetes was associated with the development of an initial CED (<i>p</i>=0.040), consistent with existing literature. There was not a significant difference in CED risk when comparing NPDR and PDR patients, although PDR patients tended to have more severe long-term outcomes with persistent corneal epithelial defects (PCEDs). This suggests that PDR patients may still require closer monitoring and earlier intervention for postoperative CED following PPV, as compared to the NPDR patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8873950"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corneal Epithelial Defects in Diabetic Patients Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Ates Hicks, Yujia Zhou, Jay Talati, Khushi Saigal, Joshua Kalish, Shivani Shah, Siva Iyer, Lauren Jeang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/joph/8873950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus is a known risk factor for corneal epithelial defects (CEDs) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), but it is unclear if diabetes severity or specific diabetic risk factors are associated with an increased risk of CED. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to identify factors associated with CED and healing time in association with diabetes severity in diabetic patients following PPV. The electronic health record database at University of Florida in Gainesville was queried to identify patients who underwent PPV for retinal detachment (RD) between April 2016 and April 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical data including type of diabetes (if present), diabetes duration and severity, and associated diabetic comorbidities. The main outcome measures included presence of a CED within one month postoperatively, treatment of CED if present, and CED healing time. A total of 637 patients were analyzed, with a total of 243 eyes (26.5%) that belonged to diabetic patients. The diabetic patients were further separated into a proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group and a nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) group. Diabetes was associated with the development of an initial CED (<i>p</i>=0.040), consistent with existing literature. There was not a significant difference in CED risk when comparing NPDR and PDR patients, although PDR patients tended to have more severe long-term outcomes with persistent corneal epithelial defects (PCEDs). This suggests that PDR patients may still require closer monitoring and earlier intervention for postoperative CED following PPV, as compared to the NPDR patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8873950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/8873950\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/8873950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病是玻璃体部分切除术(PPV)后角膜上皮缺陷(CED)的已知危险因素,但尚不清楚糖尿病严重程度或特定的糖尿病危险因素是否与CED的风险增加有关。本回顾性队列研究的目的是确定PPV后糖尿病患者发生CED和愈合时间与糖尿病严重程度相关的因素。研究人员查询了佛罗里达大学盖恩斯维尔分校的电子健康记录数据库,以确定2016年4月至2022年4月期间因视网膜脱离(RD)接受PPV治疗的患者。临床资料包括糖尿病类型(如果存在)、糖尿病病程和严重程度以及相关的糖尿病合并症。主要观察指标包括术后1个月内是否出现CED,是否接受了治疗,以及CED的愈合时间。共分析637例患者,其中糖尿病患者243只眼(26.5%)。将糖尿病患者进一步分为增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)组和非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)组。糖尿病与初始CED的发展相关(p=0.040),与现有文献一致。当比较NPDR和PDR患者时,CED风险没有显著差异,尽管PDR患者往往有更严重的长期结局,持续性角膜上皮缺陷(PCEDs)。这表明,与NPDR患者人群相比,PDR患者可能仍然需要更密切的监测和早期干预PPV术后CED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corneal Epithelial Defects in Diabetic Patients Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

Diabetes mellitus is a known risk factor for corneal epithelial defects (CEDs) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), but it is unclear if diabetes severity or specific diabetic risk factors are associated with an increased risk of CED. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to identify factors associated with CED and healing time in association with diabetes severity in diabetic patients following PPV. The electronic health record database at University of Florida in Gainesville was queried to identify patients who underwent PPV for retinal detachment (RD) between April 2016 and April 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for clinical data including type of diabetes (if present), diabetes duration and severity, and associated diabetic comorbidities. The main outcome measures included presence of a CED within one month postoperatively, treatment of CED if present, and CED healing time. A total of 637 patients were analyzed, with a total of 243 eyes (26.5%) that belonged to diabetic patients. The diabetic patients were further separated into a proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group and a nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) group. Diabetes was associated with the development of an initial CED (p=0.040), consistent with existing literature. There was not a significant difference in CED risk when comparing NPDR and PDR patients, although PDR patients tended to have more severe long-term outcomes with persistent corneal epithelial defects (PCEDs). This suggests that PDR patients may still require closer monitoring and earlier intervention for postoperative CED following PPV, as compared to the NPDR patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信