Syed Abdul Haseeb Ahmad, Syed Bilal Ahmad, Zain Ul Abidin, Nosheen Faiz, Iftikhar Ahmad
{"title":"使用Geant4蒙特卡罗模拟重新计算均匀和非均匀几何的散射分数。","authors":"Syed Abdul Haseeb Ahmad, Syed Bilal Ahmad, Zain Ul Abidin, Nosheen Faiz, Iftikhar Ahmad","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary aim of this study was to determine the scatter fraction from patient, particularly in the presence of patient heterogeneities, using Monte Carlo simulations. The Geant4 toolkit was used to estimate the scatter fractions of 6, 10, 15, and 24 MV circular photon beams (area ~400 cm2). For scatter fraction calculation in a cubic water phantom at 100 cm from a point source, concentric spheres were designed, with the inner sphere radius ~1 m and the outer sphere was either 1.015 or 1.025 cm to allow dose build-up. The scatter fractions were calculated in water and heterogeneous medium (i.e. a slab of either lung, stainless steel, or aluminum) in the range of scattering angles (i.e. 3°-150°). Higher energy beams (i.e. 24 MV) exhibit a rapid fall-off in scatter fraction compared to lower energy beams (i.e. 6 MV). For angles below 35°, higher energy beams have the largest scatter fraction. Beyond 60°, smallest energy beams show the largest scatter fraction. The scatter fraction deviates by up to 48% from published data.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recalculation of scatter fractions for homogeneous and heterogeneous geometries using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Abdul Haseeb Ahmad, Syed Bilal Ahmad, Zain Ul Abidin, Nosheen Faiz, Iftikhar Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpd/ncaf050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary aim of this study was to determine the scatter fraction from patient, particularly in the presence of patient heterogeneities, using Monte Carlo simulations. The Geant4 toolkit was used to estimate the scatter fractions of 6, 10, 15, and 24 MV circular photon beams (area ~400 cm2). For scatter fraction calculation in a cubic water phantom at 100 cm from a point source, concentric spheres were designed, with the inner sphere radius ~1 m and the outer sphere was either 1.015 or 1.025 cm to allow dose build-up. The scatter fractions were calculated in water and heterogeneous medium (i.e. a slab of either lung, stainless steel, or aluminum) in the range of scattering angles (i.e. 3°-150°). Higher energy beams (i.e. 24 MV) exhibit a rapid fall-off in scatter fraction compared to lower energy beams (i.e. 6 MV). For angles below 35°, higher energy beams have the largest scatter fraction. Beyond 60°, smallest energy beams show the largest scatter fraction. The scatter fraction deviates by up to 48% from published data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recalculation of scatter fractions for homogeneous and heterogeneous geometries using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations.
The primary aim of this study was to determine the scatter fraction from patient, particularly in the presence of patient heterogeneities, using Monte Carlo simulations. The Geant4 toolkit was used to estimate the scatter fractions of 6, 10, 15, and 24 MV circular photon beams (area ~400 cm2). For scatter fraction calculation in a cubic water phantom at 100 cm from a point source, concentric spheres were designed, with the inner sphere radius ~1 m and the outer sphere was either 1.015 or 1.025 cm to allow dose build-up. The scatter fractions were calculated in water and heterogeneous medium (i.e. a slab of either lung, stainless steel, or aluminum) in the range of scattering angles (i.e. 3°-150°). Higher energy beams (i.e. 24 MV) exhibit a rapid fall-off in scatter fraction compared to lower energy beams (i.e. 6 MV). For angles below 35°, higher energy beams have the largest scatter fraction. Beyond 60°, smallest energy beams show the largest scatter fraction. The scatter fraction deviates by up to 48% from published data.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.