改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的比较。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yang Chen, Shi-Gang Guo, Xin-Ao Fu, Zong-Qi Fan, Jie-Qing Yuan, Xiao-Xin Zhang, Huan Liu, Zhu Liu, Yong-Shuai Huang, Lei Song
{"title":"改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的比较。","authors":"Yang Chen, Shi-Gang Guo, Xin-Ao Fu, Zong-Qi Fan, Jie-Qing Yuan, Xiao-Xin Zhang, Huan Liu, Zhu Liu, Yong-Shuai Huang, Lei Song","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy is an advanced minimally invasive surgery that involves the use of upgraded instruments and equipment. We previously modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy with needle-type grasping forceps (mSLAN) for patients with simple appendicitis, but the feasibility and safety of our modified procedure need further evaluation in a high-quality clinical study.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of mSLAN with those of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial included patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis at our center between April 2024 and August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the mSLAN group or the CLA group <i>via</i> computer-generated randomization. The primary endpoint was the 24-hour postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the secondary endpoints included the operative time, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response biomarkers (including white blood cells, the neutrophil ratio, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein), time to first postoperative exhaust, time to first out-of-bed activity, postoperative length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, and incidence of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: The mSLAN group (<i>n</i> = 36) and the CLA group (<i>n</i> = 36). The 24-hour VAS scores, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response marker levels, first postoperative exhaust times, first out-of-bed activity times, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, operative times, or hospitalization costs did not significantly differ between the two groups. No postoperative complications, including incision infection or hernia, abdominal abscess or intestinal obstruction, were observed during the 1-month postoperative follow-up in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the CLA protocol, the mSLAN protocol for acute uncomplicated appendicitis yielded comparable short-term clinical outcomes, with a similar operative time and better cosmetic outcomes, indicating its potential for clinical application and superiority for patients with high cosmetic requirements. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"102607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps <i>vs</i> conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Chen, Shi-Gang Guo, Xin-Ao Fu, Zong-Qi Fan, Jie-Qing Yuan, Xiao-Xin Zhang, Huan Liu, Zhu Liu, Yong-Shuai Huang, Lei Song\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy is an advanced minimally invasive surgery that involves the use of upgraded instruments and equipment. We previously modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy with needle-type grasping forceps (mSLAN) for patients with simple appendicitis, but the feasibility and safety of our modified procedure need further evaluation in a high-quality clinical study.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of mSLAN with those of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial included patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis at our center between April 2024 and August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the mSLAN group or the CLA group <i>via</i> computer-generated randomization. The primary endpoint was the 24-hour postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the secondary endpoints included the operative time, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response biomarkers (including white blood cells, the neutrophil ratio, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein), time to first postoperative exhaust, time to first out-of-bed activity, postoperative length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, and incidence of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: The mSLAN group (<i>n</i> = 36) and the CLA group (<i>n</i> = 36). The 24-hour VAS scores, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response marker levels, first postoperative exhaust times, first out-of-bed activity times, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, operative times, or hospitalization costs did not significantly differ between the two groups. No postoperative complications, including incision infection or hernia, abdominal abscess or intestinal obstruction, were observed during the 1-month postoperative follow-up in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the CLA protocol, the mSLAN protocol for acute uncomplicated appendicitis yielded comparable short-term clinical outcomes, with a similar operative time and better cosmetic outcomes, indicating its potential for clinical application and superiority for patients with high cosmetic requirements. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"102607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种先进的微创手术,需要使用先进的仪器和设备。我们曾对单纯性阑尾炎患者改良单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,采用针型抓钳(mSLAN),但我们改良手术的可行性和安全性需要在高质量的临床研究中进一步评估。目的:比较mSLAN与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的近期临床效果。方法:这项单中心、单盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验纳入了2024年4月至2024年8月在我中心接受急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的患者。通过计算机随机化将患者随机分为mSLAN组和CLA组。主要终点是术后24小时视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,次要终点包括手术时间、术后24小时炎症反应生物标志物(包括白细胞、中性粒细胞比率、白细胞介素-6和c反应蛋白)、术后首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、住院费用和术后并发症发生率。结果:共纳入72例患者,随机分为2组:mSLAN组(n = 36)和CLA组(n = 36)。24小时VAS评分、术后24小时炎症反应标志物水平、术后首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、手术时间或住院费用在两组之间无显著差异。术后随访1个月,两组均无切口感染、疝、腹腔脓肿、肠梗阻等并发症发生。结论:与CLA方案相比,mSLAN方案治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的短期临床效果相当,手术时间相似,美容效果更好,表明其在临床应用潜力和美容要求高的患者中的优越性。需要进一步的研究来评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

Background: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy is an advanced minimally invasive surgery that involves the use of upgraded instruments and equipment. We previously modified single-port laparoscopic appendectomy with needle-type grasping forceps (mSLAN) for patients with simple appendicitis, but the feasibility and safety of our modified procedure need further evaluation in a high-quality clinical study.

Aim: To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of mSLAN with those of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

Methods: This single-center, single-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial included patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis at our center between April 2024 and August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the mSLAN group or the CLA group via computer-generated randomization. The primary endpoint was the 24-hour postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the secondary endpoints included the operative time, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response biomarkers (including white blood cells, the neutrophil ratio, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein), time to first postoperative exhaust, time to first out-of-bed activity, postoperative length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, and incidence of postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: The mSLAN group (n = 36) and the CLA group (n = 36). The 24-hour VAS scores, 24-hour postoperative inflammatory response marker levels, first postoperative exhaust times, first out-of-bed activity times, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, operative times, or hospitalization costs did not significantly differ between the two groups. No postoperative complications, including incision infection or hernia, abdominal abscess or intestinal obstruction, were observed during the 1-month postoperative follow-up in either group.

Conclusion: Compared with the CLA protocol, the mSLAN protocol for acute uncomplicated appendicitis yielded comparable short-term clinical outcomes, with a similar operative time and better cosmetic outcomes, indicating its potential for clinical application and superiority for patients with high cosmetic requirements. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信