Nicolas Bougas, Terhi Kangas, Katrien Vanthomme, Jose Joaquín Mira Solves, Gaël Brulé, Helene Mellerio, Hadewijch Vandenheede, Agnes Dumas
{"title":"罕见病患者的就业和工作能力:系统的文献综述。","authors":"Nicolas Bougas, Terhi Kangas, Katrien Vanthomme, Jose Joaquín Mira Solves, Gaël Brulé, Helene Mellerio, Hadewijch Vandenheede, Agnes Dumas","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03691-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The socioeconomic impact of rare diseases has been mostly studied at the macrolevel, but evidence at the microlevel is lacking, which overshadows health-related social inequalities affecting people with rare diseases, namely, health selection effects.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study presents an overview of employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases, two factors related to health selection effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched from 2013 to 2023. Eligible studies needed to investigate at least one work-related outcome measuring employment or work ability in individuals living with rare diseases and to compare it with a control group. Indeed, including only studies with matched or standardized control groups is essential for ensuring the reliability and validity of research findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,694 abstracts identified, 44 studies, including 34 rare diseases, met the inclusion criteria. Administrative databases were used to collect work-related data in 48% of the studies, and 73% of the studies employed matching methods for comparison. Overall, 52% of the studies focused solely on employment, 14% focused solely on work ability and 34% included both categories. Individuals with rare diseases were less likely to be employed or more likely to be unemployed than controls in 68% of the studies and 87% of the studies reported that individuals with rare diseases were more likely to be work disabled. Regarding work ability, 90% of the studies reported more missed work time in cases than in controls, and more perceived impairment at work was found in 100% of the studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>These results show that individuals with rare diseases tend to have poor work outcomes, but methodological limitations hamper the understanding of health selection effects. Implications for future research and policy-making are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Bougas, Terhi Kangas, Katrien Vanthomme, Jose Joaquín Mira Solves, Gaël Brulé, Helene Mellerio, Hadewijch Vandenheede, Agnes Dumas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13023-025-03691-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The socioeconomic impact of rare diseases has been mostly studied at the macrolevel, but evidence at the microlevel is lacking, which overshadows health-related social inequalities affecting people with rare diseases, namely, health selection effects.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study presents an overview of employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases, two factors related to health selection effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched from 2013 to 2023. Eligible studies needed to investigate at least one work-related outcome measuring employment or work ability in individuals living with rare diseases and to compare it with a control group. Indeed, including only studies with matched or standardized control groups is essential for ensuring the reliability and validity of research findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7,694 abstracts identified, 44 studies, including 34 rare diseases, met the inclusion criteria. Administrative databases were used to collect work-related data in 48% of the studies, and 73% of the studies employed matching methods for comparison. Overall, 52% of the studies focused solely on employment, 14% focused solely on work ability and 34% included both categories. Individuals with rare diseases were less likely to be employed or more likely to be unemployed than controls in 68% of the studies and 87% of the studies reported that individuals with rare diseases were more likely to be work disabled. Regarding work ability, 90% of the studies reported more missed work time in cases than in controls, and more perceived impairment at work was found in 100% of the studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>These results show that individuals with rare diseases tend to have poor work outcomes, but methodological limitations hamper the understanding of health selection effects. Implications for future research and policy-making are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03691-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03691-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:罕见病的社会经济影响的研究主要集中在宏观层面,但缺乏微观层面的证据,这掩盖了影响罕见病患者健康相关的社会不平等,即健康选择效应。目的:本研究概述了罕见病患者的就业和工作能力,这两个因素与健康选择效应有关。方法:采用PRISMA检查表进行系统的文献回顾。从2013年到2023年,检索了PubMed、Embase和Web of Science三个电子数据库。符合条件的研究需要调查至少一项与工作相关的结果,衡量罕见疾病患者的就业或工作能力,并将其与对照组进行比较。事实上,只纳入匹配或标准化控制组的研究对于确保研究结果的可靠性和有效性至关重要。结果:在纳入的7694篇摘要中,有44篇研究(包括34篇罕见病)符合纳入标准。48%的研究使用行政数据库收集与工作相关的数据,73%的研究采用匹配方法进行比较。总的来说,52%的研究只关注就业,14%的研究只关注工作能力,34%的研究两方面都包括。在68%的研究中,患有罕见病的人比对照组更不可能就业或更可能失业,87%的研究报告称,患有罕见病的人更有可能丧失工作能力。在工作能力方面,90%的研究报告说,与对照组相比,病例中的缺勤时间更多,而且100%的研究发现,工作中存在更多的感知障碍。讨论/结论:这些结果表明,患有罕见疾病的个体往往工作成果较差,但方法上的局限性阻碍了对健康选择效应的理解。讨论了对未来研究和政策制定的影响。
Employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases: a systematic literature review.
Background: The socioeconomic impact of rare diseases has been mostly studied at the macrolevel, but evidence at the microlevel is lacking, which overshadows health-related social inequalities affecting people with rare diseases, namely, health selection effects.
Aim: This study presents an overview of employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases, two factors related to health selection effects.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. Three electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched from 2013 to 2023. Eligible studies needed to investigate at least one work-related outcome measuring employment or work ability in individuals living with rare diseases and to compare it with a control group. Indeed, including only studies with matched or standardized control groups is essential for ensuring the reliability and validity of research findings.
Results: Of the 7,694 abstracts identified, 44 studies, including 34 rare diseases, met the inclusion criteria. Administrative databases were used to collect work-related data in 48% of the studies, and 73% of the studies employed matching methods for comparison. Overall, 52% of the studies focused solely on employment, 14% focused solely on work ability and 34% included both categories. Individuals with rare diseases were less likely to be employed or more likely to be unemployed than controls in 68% of the studies and 87% of the studies reported that individuals with rare diseases were more likely to be work disabled. Regarding work ability, 90% of the studies reported more missed work time in cases than in controls, and more perceived impairment at work was found in 100% of the studies.
Discussion/conclusion: These results show that individuals with rare diseases tend to have poor work outcomes, but methodological limitations hamper the understanding of health selection effects. Implications for future research and policy-making are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.