Julia Bodas-Romero, Laura Batres, Gonzalo Carracedo
{"title":"不同控制近视软性隐形眼镜的度数分析。","authors":"Julia Bodas-Romero, Laura Batres, Gonzalo Carracedo","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to characterize the power profile of different soft contact lens designs for myopia control and assess the stability of their power parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight different soft contact lens designs for myopia control were studied using the NIMO TR1504. A total of 96 contact lenses were measured, ranging from -0.50 D to -6.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Each power and design were measured three times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One dual focus, two extended depth of focus (EDOF), and five gradient multifocal (MF) designs were identified. The dual focus design had an optical zone diameter (OZ) of 3.23±0.07 mm and an addition of 1.99±0.30 D. The two EDOF designs had OZs of 0.93±0.38 mm and 2.21±0.11 mm, being the smallest among the eight designs. Finally, the MF designs showed the highest OZ of 3.64±0.06 mm and additions ranging from 0.69±0.14 D to 8.49±2.61 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These designs differ in characteristics such as OZ and addition. In some designs, the addition power or OZ may be influenced by the lens power. The EDOF and one MF design demonstrated the greatest stability. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal OZ and addition for myopia control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"261-268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power Profiles of Different Myopia Control Soft Contact Lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Bodas-Romero, Laura Batres, Gonzalo Carracedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to characterize the power profile of different soft contact lens designs for myopia control and assess the stability of their power parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight different soft contact lens designs for myopia control were studied using the NIMO TR1504. A total of 96 contact lenses were measured, ranging from -0.50 D to -6.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Each power and design were measured three times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One dual focus, two extended depth of focus (EDOF), and five gradient multifocal (MF) designs were identified. The dual focus design had an optical zone diameter (OZ) of 3.23±0.07 mm and an addition of 1.99±0.30 D. The two EDOF designs had OZs of 0.93±0.38 mm and 2.21±0.11 mm, being the smallest among the eight designs. Finally, the MF designs showed the highest OZ of 3.64±0.06 mm and additions ranging from 0.69±0.14 D to 8.49±2.61 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These designs differ in characteristics such as OZ and addition. In some designs, the addition power or OZ may be influenced by the lens power. The EDOF and one MF design demonstrated the greatest stability. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal OZ and addition for myopia control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"261-268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Power Profiles of Different Myopia Control Soft Contact Lenses.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to characterize the power profile of different soft contact lens designs for myopia control and assess the stability of their power parameters.
Methods: Eight different soft contact lens designs for myopia control were studied using the NIMO TR1504. A total of 96 contact lenses were measured, ranging from -0.50 D to -6.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Each power and design were measured three times.
Results: One dual focus, two extended depth of focus (EDOF), and five gradient multifocal (MF) designs were identified. The dual focus design had an optical zone diameter (OZ) of 3.23±0.07 mm and an addition of 1.99±0.30 D. The two EDOF designs had OZs of 0.93±0.38 mm and 2.21±0.11 mm, being the smallest among the eight designs. Finally, the MF designs showed the highest OZ of 3.64±0.06 mm and additions ranging from 0.69±0.14 D to 8.49±2.61 D.
Conclusions: These designs differ in characteristics such as OZ and addition. In some designs, the addition power or OZ may be influenced by the lens power. The EDOF and one MF design demonstrated the greatest stability. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal OZ and addition for myopia control.
期刊介绍:
Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.