评估皮肤衰竭指标量表在急性皮肤衰竭诊断中的应用。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Jessica N Fields, Hilary Hancock, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram
{"title":"评估皮肤衰竭指标量表在急性皮肤衰竭诊断中的应用。","authors":"Jessica N Fields, Hilary Hancock, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients are at increased risk of skin breakdown that may occur in non-pressure locations. Recognition of skin failure as distinct from hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) may have significant clinical, financial, and legal implications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To apply a novel diagnostic scale in the care of patients with pressure injuries to determine its utility in diagnosing skin failure at a quaternary hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Critically ill patients at a quaternary hospital from September 2022 through November 2023 with a HAPI diagnosis were included. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, clinical outcomes, and wound parameters. Skin failure was evaluated using the Hill and Petersen Skin Failure Clinical Indicator Scale (SFCIS), with patients with a score of 15 to 21 considered to have high probability of skin failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 12 patients were found to meet criteria for skin failure. For those patients, the mean length of stay was 58 days. All patients scored above 15 on the SFCIS, with 3 patients scoring 21 and 9 patients scoring 18. All patients met criteria for impaired blood flow and sepsis or multisystem organ dysfunction syndrome. Four patients met criteria for moderate or severe protein calorie malnutrition with an albumin level of less than 3.5 g/dL. Ten patients received mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twelve patients who were identified has having HAPIs were reclassified as having skin failure using the SFCIS. Further work is necessary to validate this scoring system in diagnosing skin failure and the implications associated with its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 3","pages":"114-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the use of a skin failure indicator scale in the diagnosis of acute skin failure.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica N Fields, Hilary Hancock, Jeffrey W Shupp, Shawn Tejiram\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients are at increased risk of skin breakdown that may occur in non-pressure locations. Recognition of skin failure as distinct from hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) may have significant clinical, financial, and legal implications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To apply a novel diagnostic scale in the care of patients with pressure injuries to determine its utility in diagnosing skin failure at a quaternary hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Critically ill patients at a quaternary hospital from September 2022 through November 2023 with a HAPI diagnosis were included. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, clinical outcomes, and wound parameters. Skin failure was evaluated using the Hill and Petersen Skin Failure Clinical Indicator Scale (SFCIS), with patients with a score of 15 to 21 considered to have high probability of skin failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 12 patients were found to meet criteria for skin failure. For those patients, the mean length of stay was 58 days. All patients scored above 15 on the SFCIS, with 3 patients scoring 21 and 9 patients scoring 18. All patients met criteria for impaired blood flow and sepsis or multisystem organ dysfunction syndrome. Four patients met criteria for moderate or severe protein calorie malnutrition with an albumin level of less than 3.5 g/dL. Ten patients received mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twelve patients who were identified has having HAPIs were reclassified as having skin failure using the SFCIS. Further work is necessary to validate this scoring system in diagnosing skin failure and the implications associated with its use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"114-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危重患者在非压迫部位发生皮肤破裂的风险增加。识别皮肤衰竭不同于医院获得性压力损伤(HAPIs)可能具有重要的临床、经济和法律意义。目的:应用一种新的压伤诊断量表,探讨其在第四医院皮肤衰竭诊断中的应用价值。材料和方法:纳入2022年9月至2023年11月在某第四医院经HAPI诊断的危重患者。回顾性回顾图表的人口统计学、临床结果和伤口参数。皮肤衰竭采用Hill和Petersen皮肤衰竭临床指标量表(SFCIS)进行评估,评分在15到21分的患者被认为是皮肤衰竭的高概率患者。结果:在研究期间,12例患者符合皮肤衰竭标准。这些患者的平均住院时间为58天。所有患者的SFCIS评分均在15分以上,其中3例为21分,9例为18分。所有患者均符合血流受损和败血症或多系统器官功能障碍综合征的标准。4例患者符合中度或重度蛋白质热量营养不良的标准,白蛋白水平低于3.5 g/dL。10例患者机械通气时间超过72小时。结论:使用SFCIS将12例确诊为HAPIs的患者重新分类为皮肤衰竭。进一步的工作是必要的,以验证该评分系统在诊断皮肤衰竭及其使用相关的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the use of a skin failure indicator scale in the diagnosis of acute skin failure.

Background: Critically ill patients are at increased risk of skin breakdown that may occur in non-pressure locations. Recognition of skin failure as distinct from hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) may have significant clinical, financial, and legal implications.

Objective: To apply a novel diagnostic scale in the care of patients with pressure injuries to determine its utility in diagnosing skin failure at a quaternary hospital.

Materials and methods: Critically ill patients at a quaternary hospital from September 2022 through November 2023 with a HAPI diagnosis were included. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, clinical outcomes, and wound parameters. Skin failure was evaluated using the Hill and Petersen Skin Failure Clinical Indicator Scale (SFCIS), with patients with a score of 15 to 21 considered to have high probability of skin failure.

Results: During the study period, 12 patients were found to meet criteria for skin failure. For those patients, the mean length of stay was 58 days. All patients scored above 15 on the SFCIS, with 3 patients scoring 21 and 9 patients scoring 18. All patients met criteria for impaired blood flow and sepsis or multisystem organ dysfunction syndrome. Four patients met criteria for moderate or severe protein calorie malnutrition with an albumin level of less than 3.5 g/dL. Ten patients received mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours.

Conclusion: Twelve patients who were identified has having HAPIs were reclassified as having skin failure using the SFCIS. Further work is necessary to validate this scoring system in diagnosing skin failure and the implications associated with its use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信