[使用新型等离子射频发生器和一次性粘膜切口刀内镜下解剖胃肠道息肉:一项前瞻性、多中心、非劣效性、随机、对照临床试验]。

Q3 Medicine
B H Song, G J Shi, X Y Xu, J X Xu, L Feng, J G Xu, P H Zhou, M Y Cai
{"title":"[使用新型等离子射频发生器和一次性粘膜切口刀内镜下解剖胃肠道息肉:一项前瞻性、多中心、非劣效性、随机、对照临床试验]。","authors":"B H Song, G J Shi, X Y Xu, J X Xu, L Feng, J G Xu, P H Zhou, M Y Cai","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241025-00353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new plasma radiofrequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastrointestinal lesions. <b>Methods:</b> This study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority multicenter study (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No.: ChiCTR2000041394). The inclusion criteria for cases are as follows: (1) being able to understand and voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, and voluntarily signing the informed consent form; (2) being 18-70 years old, regardless of gender; (3) having a gastrointestinal lesion and meeting the endoscopic treatment conditions for the indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The exclusion criteria are: (1) meeting the contraindications for ESD; (2) having a surgical contraindication due to coagulation dysfunction or still taking anticoagulants 1 week before surgery; (3) having coagulation dysfunction, that is, the prothrombin time is prolonged by more than 3 seconds (more than 5 seconds in patients with liver disease), or the activated partial thromboplastin time is prolonged by more than 10 seconds, and the platelet count is < 70×10⁹/L; (4) having severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency and being unable to tolerate the surgery; (5) being a reproductive-aged woman with a positive blood or urine pregnancy test or a lactating woman; (6) the investigator deems that there are other factors that are not suitable for inclusion or affect the subject's participation. Patients who underwent ESD treatment for gastrointestinal lesions from March 2019 to April 2023 at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, the Department of Gastroenterology of Minhang District Central Hospital in Shanghai, and the Department of Gastroenterology of Quzhou People's Hospital were prospectively included. The experimental group used a new plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and a disposable mucosal incision knife, while the control group used a high-frequency electrosurgical system and a disposable mucosal incision knife. The primary efficacy indicator was the <i>en bloc</i> resection success rate, the secondary efficacy indicators included the coagulation success rate, and the operation stability of the plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and the disposable mucosal incision knife; the safety indicators included the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative perforation, and postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 194 patients, 95 in the experimental group and 99 in the control group. Analysis of the full set showed rates of <i>en bloc</i> resection of 97.89% (93/95) and 96.97% (96/99) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.53% (-5.58%, 6.64%). Analysis of the compliance set showed rates of en bloc resection of 97.83% (90/92) and 96.88% (93/96) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.58% (-5.79%, 6.94%). These data indicate that the rate of <i>en bloc</i> resection in the experimental group using plasma radiofrequency therapy and disposable mucosal incision was not inferior to that of the control group. The rates of achieving intraoperative coagulation in the experimental and control groups were 7.14% (5/70) and 5.97% (4/67), respectively; this difference is not statistically significant (<i>P</i>=1.000). The control group had a significantly better rate of using the same instruments throughout the procedure than did the experimental group (<i>P</i><0.001). In the safety analysis set, the incidences of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (both <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Plasma radiofrequency therapy equipment and a disposable mucosal incision knife are safe and effective instruments for performing ESD of gastrointestinal lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"28 4","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal polyps with a novel plasma radio frequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife: A prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled clinical trial].\",\"authors\":\"B H Song, G J Shi, X Y Xu, J X Xu, L Feng, J G Xu, P H Zhou, M Y Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241025-00353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new plasma radiofrequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastrointestinal lesions. <b>Methods:</b> This study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority multicenter study (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No.: ChiCTR2000041394). The inclusion criteria for cases are as follows: (1) being able to understand and voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, and voluntarily signing the informed consent form; (2) being 18-70 years old, regardless of gender; (3) having a gastrointestinal lesion and meeting the endoscopic treatment conditions for the indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The exclusion criteria are: (1) meeting the contraindications for ESD; (2) having a surgical contraindication due to coagulation dysfunction or still taking anticoagulants 1 week before surgery; (3) having coagulation dysfunction, that is, the prothrombin time is prolonged by more than 3 seconds (more than 5 seconds in patients with liver disease), or the activated partial thromboplastin time is prolonged by more than 10 seconds, and the platelet count is < 70×10⁹/L; (4) having severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency and being unable to tolerate the surgery; (5) being a reproductive-aged woman with a positive blood or urine pregnancy test or a lactating woman; (6) the investigator deems that there are other factors that are not suitable for inclusion or affect the subject's participation. Patients who underwent ESD treatment for gastrointestinal lesions from March 2019 to April 2023 at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, the Department of Gastroenterology of Minhang District Central Hospital in Shanghai, and the Department of Gastroenterology of Quzhou People's Hospital were prospectively included. The experimental group used a new plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and a disposable mucosal incision knife, while the control group used a high-frequency electrosurgical system and a disposable mucosal incision knife. The primary efficacy indicator was the <i>en bloc</i> resection success rate, the secondary efficacy indicators included the coagulation success rate, and the operation stability of the plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and the disposable mucosal incision knife; the safety indicators included the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative perforation, and postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> The study cohort comprised 194 patients, 95 in the experimental group and 99 in the control group. Analysis of the full set showed rates of <i>en bloc</i> resection of 97.89% (93/95) and 96.97% (96/99) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.53% (-5.58%, 6.64%). Analysis of the compliance set showed rates of en bloc resection of 97.83% (90/92) and 96.88% (93/96) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.58% (-5.79%, 6.94%). These data indicate that the rate of <i>en bloc</i> resection in the experimental group using plasma radiofrequency therapy and disposable mucosal incision was not inferior to that of the control group. The rates of achieving intraoperative coagulation in the experimental and control groups were 7.14% (5/70) and 5.97% (4/67), respectively; this difference is not statistically significant (<i>P</i>=1.000). The control group had a significantly better rate of using the same instruments throughout the procedure than did the experimental group (<i>P</i><0.001). In the safety analysis set, the incidences of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (both <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Plasma radiofrequency therapy equipment and a disposable mucosal incision knife are safe and effective instruments for performing ESD of gastrointestinal lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"384-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241025-00353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241025-00353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价一种新型等离子射频发生器和一次性粘膜切口刀用于内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)胃肠道病变的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性的多中心研究。: ChiCTR2000041394)。病例的入选标准为:(1)能够理解并自愿参加本临床试验,并自愿签署知情同意书;(二)年龄在十八周岁至七十周岁之间,不分性别;(3)有胃肠道病变,符合内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)指征的内镜治疗条件。排除标准为:(1)符合ESD禁忌症;(二)有凝血功能障碍手术禁忌症或术前1周仍在服用抗凝药物的;(3)有凝血功能障碍,即凝血酶原时间延长3秒以上(肝病患者延长5秒以上),或活化的部分凝血活素时间延长10秒以上,且血小板计数< 70×10⁹/L;(四)严重心肺功能不全,不能承受手术的;(五)血尿妊娠试验阳性的育龄妇女或者哺乳期妇女;(6)研究者认为存在其他不适合纳入或者影响受试者参与的因素。前瞻性纳入2019年3月至2023年4月在复旦大学附属中山医院内镜中心、上海市闵行区中心医院消化内科和衢州市人民医院消化内科接受ESD治疗的胃肠道病变患者。实验组采用新型等离子体射频治疗仪和一次性粘膜切口刀,对照组采用高频电刀系统和一次性粘膜切口刀。主要疗效指标为整体切除成功率,次要疗效指标为凝血成功率、等离子射频治疗仪和一次性粘膜切口刀的操作稳定性;安全性指标包括术中出血发生率、术中穿孔发生率、术后并发症发生率。结果:研究队列共194例患者,实验组95例,对照组99例。全组分析显示,实验组和对照组的整体切除率分别为97.89%(93/95)和96.97% (96/99);差异为0.53%(-5.58%,6.64%)。依从性分析显示,实验组和对照组的整体切除率分别为97.83%(90/92)和96.88% (93/96);差异为0.58%(-5.79%,6.94%)。这些数据表明,实验组采用等离子体射频治疗和一次性粘膜切口的整体切除率不低于对照组。实验组和对照组术中凝血成功率分别为7.14%(5/70)和5.97% (4/67);这一差异在统计学上不显著(P=1.000)。对照组在整个手术过程中使用相同仪器的比率明显高于实验组(PP>0.05)。结论:等离子体射频治疗仪和一次性粘膜切口刀是对胃肠道病变进行ESD治疗安全有效的器械。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal polyps with a novel plasma radio frequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife: A prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled clinical trial].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new plasma radiofrequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastrointestinal lesions. Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority multicenter study (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No.: ChiCTR2000041394). The inclusion criteria for cases are as follows: (1) being able to understand and voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, and voluntarily signing the informed consent form; (2) being 18-70 years old, regardless of gender; (3) having a gastrointestinal lesion and meeting the endoscopic treatment conditions for the indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The exclusion criteria are: (1) meeting the contraindications for ESD; (2) having a surgical contraindication due to coagulation dysfunction or still taking anticoagulants 1 week before surgery; (3) having coagulation dysfunction, that is, the prothrombin time is prolonged by more than 3 seconds (more than 5 seconds in patients with liver disease), or the activated partial thromboplastin time is prolonged by more than 10 seconds, and the platelet count is < 70×10⁹/L; (4) having severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency and being unable to tolerate the surgery; (5) being a reproductive-aged woman with a positive blood or urine pregnancy test or a lactating woman; (6) the investigator deems that there are other factors that are not suitable for inclusion or affect the subject's participation. Patients who underwent ESD treatment for gastrointestinal lesions from March 2019 to April 2023 at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, the Department of Gastroenterology of Minhang District Central Hospital in Shanghai, and the Department of Gastroenterology of Quzhou People's Hospital were prospectively included. The experimental group used a new plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and a disposable mucosal incision knife, while the control group used a high-frequency electrosurgical system and a disposable mucosal incision knife. The primary efficacy indicator was the en bloc resection success rate, the secondary efficacy indicators included the coagulation success rate, and the operation stability of the plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and the disposable mucosal incision knife; the safety indicators included the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative perforation, and postoperative complications. Results: The study cohort comprised 194 patients, 95 in the experimental group and 99 in the control group. Analysis of the full set showed rates of en bloc resection of 97.89% (93/95) and 96.97% (96/99) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.53% (-5.58%, 6.64%). Analysis of the compliance set showed rates of en bloc resection of 97.83% (90/92) and 96.88% (93/96) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.58% (-5.79%, 6.94%). These data indicate that the rate of en bloc resection in the experimental group using plasma radiofrequency therapy and disposable mucosal incision was not inferior to that of the control group. The rates of achieving intraoperative coagulation in the experimental and control groups were 7.14% (5/70) and 5.97% (4/67), respectively; this difference is not statistically significant (P=1.000). The control group had a significantly better rate of using the same instruments throughout the procedure than did the experimental group (P<0.001). In the safety analysis set, the incidences of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusion: Plasma radiofrequency therapy equipment and a disposable mucosal incision knife are safe and effective instruments for performing ESD of gastrointestinal lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信