同行评议要点:《玻璃体视网膜疾病杂志》审稿。

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eric Jung, Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Timothy G Murray
{"title":"同行评议要点:《玻璃体视网膜疾病杂志》审稿。","authors":"Eric Jung, Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Timothy G Murray","doi":"10.1177/24741264251331647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The thoughtful process of peer review allows for the vetting and improvement of scientific work that leads to quality research and, eventually, advancement of the field of retina. Progress in medicine would not occur without dedicated researchers, but just as important are the peer reviewers who take the time assess their work, weigh in on their validity, and help bring these papers to life. Here, we discuss how to effectively review a journal manuscript in a way that helps both the beginning reviewer and the seasoned expert develop a framework to provide meaningful peer review. Although this guide was specifically written with <i>JVRD</i> aims in mind, these suggestions can be broadly applied to the process of manuscript review in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251331647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer-Review Essentials: Reviewing Manuscripts for the <i>Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Jung, Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Timothy G Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24741264251331647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The thoughtful process of peer review allows for the vetting and improvement of scientific work that leads to quality research and, eventually, advancement of the field of retina. Progress in medicine would not occur without dedicated researchers, but just as important are the peer reviewers who take the time assess their work, weigh in on their validity, and help bring these papers to life. Here, we discuss how to effectively review a journal manuscript in a way that helps both the beginning reviewer and the seasoned expert develop a framework to provide meaningful peer review. Although this guide was specifically written with <i>JVRD</i> aims in mind, these suggestions can be broadly applied to the process of manuscript review in general.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24741264251331647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251331647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251331647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深思熟虑的同行评议过程允许审查和改进科学工作,从而导致高质量的研究,并最终推动视网膜领域的发展。医学的进步离不开敬业的研究人员,但同样重要的是同行审稿人,他们花时间评估他们的工作,权衡他们的有效性,并帮助这些论文焕发生机。在这里,我们讨论如何有效地审查期刊手稿,以帮助初学者和经验丰富的专家建立一个框架来提供有意义的同行评议。虽然本指南是专门针对JVRD的目标编写的,但这些建议可以广泛应用于一般的手稿审查过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer-Review Essentials: Reviewing Manuscripts for the Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases.

The thoughtful process of peer review allows for the vetting and improvement of scientific work that leads to quality research and, eventually, advancement of the field of retina. Progress in medicine would not occur without dedicated researchers, but just as important are the peer reviewers who take the time assess their work, weigh in on their validity, and help bring these papers to life. Here, we discuss how to effectively review a journal manuscript in a way that helps both the beginning reviewer and the seasoned expert develop a framework to provide meaningful peer review. Although this guide was specifically written with JVRD aims in mind, these suggestions can be broadly applied to the process of manuscript review in general.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信