Cesare Magalotti, Martina Nisi, Elisabeth Pastor Ruiz, Chiara Romiti, Andrea Tinti, Ivan Barillaro, Alessandro Muccitelli, Lisa Franchini, Daniela Brera, Giuseppe Guarro
{"title":"互动式与传统敷料增强乳腺肿瘤手术术后评价：一项比较研究。","authors":"Cesare Magalotti, Martina Nisi, Elisabeth Pastor Ruiz, Chiara Romiti, Andrea Tinti, Ivan Barillaro, Alessandro Muccitelli, Lisa Franchini, Daniela Brera, Giuseppe Guarro","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncoplastic breast surgery balances tumor excision and aesthetics focusing on patient well-being. Patient-centered care is crucial aligning with contemporary healthcare goals. This study explored the impact of an interactive dressing on postoperative outcomes in oncoplastic breast surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 376 patients undergoing bilateral oncoplastic breast surgery was studied. Traditional dressings were applied on one side and the interactive dressing on the other. Patient demographics, procedures, and outcomes were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Statistical analysis used R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the interactive dressing to traditional dressings, 79.26% exhibited improved wound healing, 80.05% reported lower pain, and 80.32% preferred the side with the interactive dressing, according to the BREAST-Q. Efficient resource utilization is crucial. The interactive dressing's potential in wound healing aligns with evolving oncoplastic breast surgery practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparing the interactive dressing with traditional dressings in oncoplastic breast surgery suggests advantages in wound healing, pain management, shorter hospital stays, and higher patient satisfaction. Further research is needed for confirmation. Patient-centric metrics such as the BREAST-Q support a holistic evaluation aligning with healthcare objectives for improved postoperative quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Postoperative Evaluation in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery With Interactive Versus Traditional Dressings: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cesare Magalotti, Martina Nisi, Elisabeth Pastor Ruiz, Chiara Romiti, Andrea Tinti, Ivan Barillaro, Alessandro Muccitelli, Lisa Franchini, Daniela Brera, Giuseppe Guarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncoplastic breast surgery balances tumor excision and aesthetics focusing on patient well-being. Patient-centered care is crucial aligning with contemporary healthcare goals. This study explored the impact of an interactive dressing on postoperative outcomes in oncoplastic breast surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 376 patients undergoing bilateral oncoplastic breast surgery was studied. Traditional dressings were applied on one side and the interactive dressing on the other. Patient demographics, procedures, and outcomes were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Statistical analysis used R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the interactive dressing to traditional dressings, 79.26% exhibited improved wound healing, 80.05% reported lower pain, and 80.32% preferred the side with the interactive dressing, according to the BREAST-Q. Efficient resource utilization is crucial. The interactive dressing's potential in wound healing aligns with evolving oncoplastic breast surgery practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparing the interactive dressing with traditional dressings in oncoplastic breast surgery suggests advantages in wound healing, pain management, shorter hospital stays, and higher patient satisfaction. Further research is needed for confirmation. Patient-centric metrics such as the BREAST-Q support a holistic evaluation aligning with healthcare objectives for improved postoperative quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"e6724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhanced Postoperative Evaluation in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery With Interactive Versus Traditional Dressings: A Comparative Study.
Background: Oncoplastic breast surgery balances tumor excision and aesthetics focusing on patient well-being. Patient-centered care is crucial aligning with contemporary healthcare goals. This study explored the impact of an interactive dressing on postoperative outcomes in oncoplastic breast surgery.
Methods: A cohort of 376 patients undergoing bilateral oncoplastic breast surgery was studied. Traditional dressings were applied on one side and the interactive dressing on the other. Patient demographics, procedures, and outcomes were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Statistical analysis used R software.
Results: Comparing the interactive dressing to traditional dressings, 79.26% exhibited improved wound healing, 80.05% reported lower pain, and 80.32% preferred the side with the interactive dressing, according to the BREAST-Q. Efficient resource utilization is crucial. The interactive dressing's potential in wound healing aligns with evolving oncoplastic breast surgery practices.
Conclusions: Comparing the interactive dressing with traditional dressings in oncoplastic breast surgery suggests advantages in wound healing, pain management, shorter hospital stays, and higher patient satisfaction. Further research is needed for confirmation. Patient-centric metrics such as the BREAST-Q support a holistic evaluation aligning with healthcare objectives for improved postoperative quality of life.
期刊介绍：
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
