中国医疗联盟框架下骨折联络服务方案构建:修正德尔菲法研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S481843
Junye Yu, Lin Su, Lili Feng, Yongjun Li, Lingyan Qiao, Haili Yin, Dan Li, Yanni Lei, Hui Gao
{"title":"中国医疗联盟框架下骨折联络服务方案构建:修正德尔菲法研究。","authors":"Junye Yu, Lin Su, Lili Feng, Yongjun Li, Lingyan Qiao, Haili Yin, Dan Li, Yanni Lei, Hui Gao","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S481843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To devise an implementation blueprint for the fracture liaison service (FLS) model within the context of a medical consortium. The FLS is an integrated system designed to identify, register, assess, treat, and monitor patients with osteoporotic fractures. The FLS constitutes a structured intervention strategy to administer standardized care to osteoporotic fracture patients. Its efficacy has been validated through extensive implementation across various countries. However, large-scale intervention research on this model within China is lacking. This investigation endeavors to construct a comprehensive FLS framework and to establish its core performance indicators within the Chinese medical alliance structure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The research methodology encompassed focus group interviews and a two-phase Delphi process. An initial inventory of FLS implementation elements was compiled through a systematic literature review and focus group discussions. This was followed by a two-step Delphi survey, wherein experts refined the key indicators. The study calculated metrics such as response rate, composite reliability (CR), coefficient of variation, and the Kendall coefficient of concordance to evaluate the indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 17 experts who completed 2 rounds of the Delphi consultation, culminating in a consensus on 2 primary and 8 secondary indicators, encompassing 34 specific indicators. The response rate for the first and second round was 100%, with CR values of 0.871 and 0.882, and Kendall's coefficients of 0.161 and 0.179, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work delineated a robust set of indicators specifically tailored for the FLS schema under the medical alliance framework in China. The rigorous application of the Delphi technique led to a consensus on 34 pivotal indicators, elucidating their relative significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"2201-2213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction of Fracture Liaison Service Scheme Under Medical Alliance Framework in China: A Modified Delphi Method Study.\",\"authors\":\"Junye Yu, Lin Su, Lili Feng, Yongjun Li, Lingyan Qiao, Haili Yin, Dan Li, Yanni Lei, Hui Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S481843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To devise an implementation blueprint for the fracture liaison service (FLS) model within the context of a medical consortium. The FLS is an integrated system designed to identify, register, assess, treat, and monitor patients with osteoporotic fractures. The FLS constitutes a structured intervention strategy to administer standardized care to osteoporotic fracture patients. Its efficacy has been validated through extensive implementation across various countries. However, large-scale intervention research on this model within China is lacking. This investigation endeavors to construct a comprehensive FLS framework and to establish its core performance indicators within the Chinese medical alliance structure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The research methodology encompassed focus group interviews and a two-phase Delphi process. An initial inventory of FLS implementation elements was compiled through a systematic literature review and focus group discussions. This was followed by a two-step Delphi survey, wherein experts refined the key indicators. The study calculated metrics such as response rate, composite reliability (CR), coefficient of variation, and the Kendall coefficient of concordance to evaluate the indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 17 experts who completed 2 rounds of the Delphi consultation, culminating in a consensus on 2 primary and 8 secondary indicators, encompassing 34 specific indicators. The response rate for the first and second round was 100%, with CR values of 0.871 and 0.882, and Kendall's coefficients of 0.161 and 0.179, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work delineated a robust set of indicators specifically tailored for the FLS schema under the medical alliance framework in China. The rigorous application of the Delphi technique led to a consensus on 34 pivotal indicators, elucidating their relative significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2201-2213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013651/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S481843\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S481843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:设计一个医疗联合体中骨折联络服务(FLS)模式的实施蓝图。FLS是一个用于识别、登记、评估、治疗和监测骨质疏松性骨折患者的综合系统。FLS构成了一种结构化的干预策略,对骨质疏松性骨折患者进行标准化护理。通过在各国的广泛实施,其有效性得到了验证。然而,国内对该模式的大规模干预研究尚缺乏。本研究试图在中国医疗联盟结构中构建一个全面的医疗联盟服务框架,并建立其核心绩效指标。患者和方法:研究方法包括焦点小组访谈和两阶段德尔菲过程。通过系统的文献回顾和焦点小组讨论,编制了FLS实施要素的初步清单。随后进行了两步德尔菲调查,其中专家对关键指标进行了细化。研究计算了反应率、复合信度(CR)、变异系数、肯德尔一致性系数等指标对指标进行评价。结果:17位专家参与了研究,完成了2轮德尔菲咨询,最终就2个主要指标和8个次要指标达成共识,包括34个具体指标。第一轮和第二轮的有效率均为100%,CR值分别为0.871和0.882,Kendall系数分别为0.161和0.179 (P < 0.05)。结论:本研究为中国医疗联盟框架下的FLS模式描述了一套强有力的指标。德尔菲技术的严格应用导致了34个关键指标的共识,阐明了它们的相对意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Construction of Fracture Liaison Service Scheme Under Medical Alliance Framework in China: A Modified Delphi Method Study.

Purpose: To devise an implementation blueprint for the fracture liaison service (FLS) model within the context of a medical consortium. The FLS is an integrated system designed to identify, register, assess, treat, and monitor patients with osteoporotic fractures. The FLS constitutes a structured intervention strategy to administer standardized care to osteoporotic fracture patients. Its efficacy has been validated through extensive implementation across various countries. However, large-scale intervention research on this model within China is lacking. This investigation endeavors to construct a comprehensive FLS framework and to establish its core performance indicators within the Chinese medical alliance structure.

Patients and methods: The research methodology encompassed focus group interviews and a two-phase Delphi process. An initial inventory of FLS implementation elements was compiled through a systematic literature review and focus group discussions. This was followed by a two-step Delphi survey, wherein experts refined the key indicators. The study calculated metrics such as response rate, composite reliability (CR), coefficient of variation, and the Kendall coefficient of concordance to evaluate the indicators.

Results: The study involved 17 experts who completed 2 rounds of the Delphi consultation, culminating in a consensus on 2 primary and 8 secondary indicators, encompassing 34 specific indicators. The response rate for the first and second round was 100%, with CR values of 0.871 and 0.882, and Kendall's coefficients of 0.161 and 0.179, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: This work delineated a robust set of indicators specifically tailored for the FLS schema under the medical alliance framework in China. The rigorous application of the Delphi technique led to a consensus on 34 pivotal indicators, elucidating their relative significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信