白光成像与窄带成像鉴别结直肠肿瘤与非肿瘤息肉的比较研究。

Q3 Medicine
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.34172/mejdd.2025.405
Kaka Renaldi, Lily Verawati, Hasan Maulahela, Nur Rahadiani, Aulia Rizka, Ari Fahrial Syam, Dyah Purnamasari, Chyntia Olivia Maurine Jasirwan, Dicky Levenus Tahapary
{"title":"白光成像与窄带成像鉴别结直肠肿瘤与非肿瘤息肉的比较研究。","authors":"Kaka Renaldi, Lily Verawati, Hasan Maulahela, Nur Rahadiani, Aulia Rizka, Ari Fahrial Syam, Dyah Purnamasari, Chyntia Olivia Maurine Jasirwan, Dicky Levenus Tahapary","doi":"10.34172/mejdd.2025.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>White light imaging (WLI) is the current standard colonoscopy technique for diagnosing colorectal polyps in Indonesia. Various endoscopic imaging techniques have been developed to improve the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal polyps, one of which is narrow band imaging (NBI). We conducted a diagnostic study comparing the performance of NBI against WLI in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a diagnostic study that analyzes endoscopic pictures of colorectal polyps in patients who underwent colonoscopy using the WLI and NBI techniques. Previously collected biopsy tissue specimens were re-examined by a single pathologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 117 subjects analyzed, and the proportion of subjects with neoplastic polyps was 65.8%. Common indications for colonoscopy were hematochezia (24.8%) and abdominal pain (23.9%). WLI showed moderate inter-observer reliability (kappa value=0.591), while NBI showed significant reliability (kappa value=0.674). NBI demonstrated better sensitivity (84.4%; 95% CI 74.4%-91.7%) and accuracy (78.6%; 95% CI 70.1%-85.7%) compared with WLI (sensitivity 74%; 95% CI 62.8%-83.4% and accuracy 71.8%; 95% CI 62.7%-79.7%). However, the specificity was the same (67.5%; 95% CI 50.9%-81.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NBI has better performance than WLI in distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":18517,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"17 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Performance between White Light Imaging and Narrow Band Imaging in Distinguishing Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Colorectal Polyps.\",\"authors\":\"Kaka Renaldi, Lily Verawati, Hasan Maulahela, Nur Rahadiani, Aulia Rizka, Ari Fahrial Syam, Dyah Purnamasari, Chyntia Olivia Maurine Jasirwan, Dicky Levenus Tahapary\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/mejdd.2025.405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>White light imaging (WLI) is the current standard colonoscopy technique for diagnosing colorectal polyps in Indonesia. Various endoscopic imaging techniques have been developed to improve the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal polyps, one of which is narrow band imaging (NBI). We conducted a diagnostic study comparing the performance of NBI against WLI in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a diagnostic study that analyzes endoscopic pictures of colorectal polyps in patients who underwent colonoscopy using the WLI and NBI techniques. Previously collected biopsy tissue specimens were re-examined by a single pathologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 117 subjects analyzed, and the proportion of subjects with neoplastic polyps was 65.8%. Common indications for colonoscopy were hematochezia (24.8%) and abdominal pain (23.9%). WLI showed moderate inter-observer reliability (kappa value=0.591), while NBI showed significant reliability (kappa value=0.674). NBI demonstrated better sensitivity (84.4%; 95% CI 74.4%-91.7%) and accuracy (78.6%; 95% CI 70.1%-85.7%) compared with WLI (sensitivity 74%; 95% CI 62.8%-83.4% and accuracy 71.8%; 95% CI 62.7%-79.7%). However, the specificity was the same (67.5%; 95% CI 50.9%-81.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NBI has better performance than WLI in distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"19-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2025.405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2025.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:白光成像(WLI)是印度尼西亚目前诊断结肠直肠息肉的标准结肠镜检查技术。各种内镜成像技术已经发展到提高诊断结肠直肠息肉的准确性,其中一种是窄带成像(NBI)。我们进行了一项诊断研究,比较了NBI和WLI在区分肿瘤性和非肿瘤性结肠直肠息肉方面的表现。方法:这是一项诊断性研究,分析使用WLI和NBI技术进行结肠镜检查的患者的结肠直肠息肉的内镜图像。先前收集的活检组织标本由一位病理学家重新检查。结果:共分析117例患者,肿瘤性息肉患者占65.8%。结肠镜检查的常见适应症为便血(24.8%)和腹痛(23.9%)。WLI的观察者间信度为中等(kappa值=0.591),NBI的观察者间信度为显著(kappa值=0.674)。NBI表现出更好的敏感性(84.4%;95% CI 74.4%-91.7%)和准确率(78.6%;95% CI 70.1%-85.7%)与WLI相比(敏感性74%;95% CI 62.8% ~ 83.4%,准确率71.8%;95% ci 62.7%-79.7%)。然而,特异性是相同的(67.5%;95% ci 50.9%-81.4%)。结论:NBI在鉴别结直肠息肉的肿瘤性和非肿瘤性方面优于WLI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Performance between White Light Imaging and Narrow Band Imaging in Distinguishing Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Colorectal Polyps.

Background: White light imaging (WLI) is the current standard colonoscopy technique for diagnosing colorectal polyps in Indonesia. Various endoscopic imaging techniques have been developed to improve the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal polyps, one of which is narrow band imaging (NBI). We conducted a diagnostic study comparing the performance of NBI against WLI in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Methods: This was a diagnostic study that analyzes endoscopic pictures of colorectal polyps in patients who underwent colonoscopy using the WLI and NBI techniques. Previously collected biopsy tissue specimens were re-examined by a single pathologist.

Results: There were 117 subjects analyzed, and the proportion of subjects with neoplastic polyps was 65.8%. Common indications for colonoscopy were hematochezia (24.8%) and abdominal pain (23.9%). WLI showed moderate inter-observer reliability (kappa value=0.591), while NBI showed significant reliability (kappa value=0.674). NBI demonstrated better sensitivity (84.4%; 95% CI 74.4%-91.7%) and accuracy (78.6%; 95% CI 70.1%-85.7%) compared with WLI (sensitivity 74%; 95% CI 62.8%-83.4% and accuracy 71.8%; 95% CI 62.7%-79.7%). However, the specificity was the same (67.5%; 95% CI 50.9%-81.4%).

Conclusion: NBI has better performance than WLI in distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信