对Linac替换计划期间实施的临床突发事件的服务评估。

BJR open Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzaf006
Chloe Wells, Mike Kirby
{"title":"对Linac替换计划期间实施的临床突发事件的服务评估。","authors":"Chloe Wells, Mike Kirby","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A Linac Replacement Programme (LRP) was completed to ensure continuity of treatment whilst maintaining the highest standards of care. Clinical contingencies were devised to mitigate the impact of unscheduled interruptions during the LRP. This service evaluation was undertaken to appraise the effectiveness of contingencies on treatment delivery (TD) during the LRP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The oncology management system MOSAIQ was used to generate reports of treatment adjustments. These reports were then generated for Linac service history in the 2019-2020 year for comparative analysis and causative factors in Linac breakdowns. Adjustments to treatment were analysed for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 855 patients receiving treatment during the LRP, 184 were impacted in some way. Of these, 113 experienced some increase in overall treatment time (OTT); 742 (86.8%), therefore, experienced no increase in OTT, through deployment of clinical contingencies or not encountering machine breakdown during their treatment schedules. Throughout the LRP, Conebeam CT (CBCT) faults were the primary cause for machine closure. Due to this, breast patients remained on treatment at a higher rate than prostate patients who required 3D-geometric verification prior to TD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project highlighted the importance of preparation for CBCT faults and patient categorization in the development of contingencies. The extended dose and fractionation 60 Gy in 20# presented increased opportunities for cancellation in prostate patients, however, the use of MV imaging to assess patient set-up enabled continuation of TD. Increases in OTT could not be eliminated completely, however, for 21.5% of patients who experienced treatment adjustments the implementation of contingencies effectively prevented them exceeding Royal College of Radiologists guidance of 2-day extension in OTT.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>We believe this radiographer-led project is the first service evaluation reporting the practical effects on treatment of a LRP and impact of clinical contingencies used to mitigate and limit unscheduled interruptions in treatment and minimize the extension of OTT for patients during the transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"7 1","pages":"tzaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A service evaluation of the clinical contingencies implemented during a Linac replacement programme.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Wells, Mike Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjro/tzaf006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A Linac Replacement Programme (LRP) was completed to ensure continuity of treatment whilst maintaining the highest standards of care. Clinical contingencies were devised to mitigate the impact of unscheduled interruptions during the LRP. This service evaluation was undertaken to appraise the effectiveness of contingencies on treatment delivery (TD) during the LRP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The oncology management system MOSAIQ was used to generate reports of treatment adjustments. These reports were then generated for Linac service history in the 2019-2020 year for comparative analysis and causative factors in Linac breakdowns. Adjustments to treatment were analysed for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 855 patients receiving treatment during the LRP, 184 were impacted in some way. Of these, 113 experienced some increase in overall treatment time (OTT); 742 (86.8%), therefore, experienced no increase in OTT, through deployment of clinical contingencies or not encountering machine breakdown during their treatment schedules. Throughout the LRP, Conebeam CT (CBCT) faults were the primary cause for machine closure. Due to this, breast patients remained on treatment at a higher rate than prostate patients who required 3D-geometric verification prior to TD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project highlighted the importance of preparation for CBCT faults and patient categorization in the development of contingencies. The extended dose and fractionation 60 Gy in 20# presented increased opportunities for cancellation in prostate patients, however, the use of MV imaging to assess patient set-up enabled continuation of TD. Increases in OTT could not be eliminated completely, however, for 21.5% of patients who experienced treatment adjustments the implementation of contingencies effectively prevented them exceeding Royal College of Radiologists guidance of 2-day extension in OTT.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>We believe this radiographer-led project is the first service evaluation reporting the practical effects on treatment of a LRP and impact of clinical contingencies used to mitigate and limit unscheduled interruptions in treatment and minimize the extension of OTT for patients during the transition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJR open\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"tzaf006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJR open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzaf006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:完成Linac替代方案(LRP),以确保治疗的连续性,同时保持最高的护理标准。设计临床突发事件是为了减轻LRP期间计划外中断的影响。这项服务评估是为了评估LRP期间治疗交付(TD)突发事件的有效性。方法:采用肿瘤管理系统MOSAIQ生成治疗调整报告。然后根据2019-2020年的Linac服务历史生成这些报告,用于比较分析和Linac故障的原因。对每位患者的治疗调整进行分析。结果:在LRP期间接受治疗的855例患者中,184例有不同程度的影响。其中,113例患者的总治疗时间有所增加;因此,742例(86.8%)患者的OTT没有增加,这是由于在他们的治疗计划中部署了临床突发事件或没有遇到机器故障。在整个LRP中,Conebeam CT (CBCT)故障是导致机器关闭的主要原因。因此,乳腺癌患者的治疗率高于前列腺癌患者,前列腺癌患者在TD前需要进行3d几何验证。结论:该项目强调了CBCT故障准备和患者分类在突发事件发展中的重要性。20年延长剂量和60 Gy的分割增加了前列腺患者的取消机会,然而,使用MV成像来评估患者的设置使TD得以延续。OTT的增加并不能完全消除,然而,对于经历治疗调整的21.5%的患者,实施突发事件有效地阻止了他们超过皇家放射科医生指导的延长2天的OTT。知识的进步:我们相信这个由放射技师主导的项目是第一个报告LRP治疗实际效果的服务评估,以及用于减轻和限制治疗中计划外中断的临床突发事件的影响,并最大限度地减少过渡期间患者OTT的延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A service evaluation of the clinical contingencies implemented during a Linac replacement programme.

Objective: A Linac Replacement Programme (LRP) was completed to ensure continuity of treatment whilst maintaining the highest standards of care. Clinical contingencies were devised to mitigate the impact of unscheduled interruptions during the LRP. This service evaluation was undertaken to appraise the effectiveness of contingencies on treatment delivery (TD) during the LRP.

Method: The oncology management system MOSAIQ was used to generate reports of treatment adjustments. These reports were then generated for Linac service history in the 2019-2020 year for comparative analysis and causative factors in Linac breakdowns. Adjustments to treatment were analysed for each patient.

Results: Of the 855 patients receiving treatment during the LRP, 184 were impacted in some way. Of these, 113 experienced some increase in overall treatment time (OTT); 742 (86.8%), therefore, experienced no increase in OTT, through deployment of clinical contingencies or not encountering machine breakdown during their treatment schedules. Throughout the LRP, Conebeam CT (CBCT) faults were the primary cause for machine closure. Due to this, breast patients remained on treatment at a higher rate than prostate patients who required 3D-geometric verification prior to TD.

Conclusions: This project highlighted the importance of preparation for CBCT faults and patient categorization in the development of contingencies. The extended dose and fractionation 60 Gy in 20# presented increased opportunities for cancellation in prostate patients, however, the use of MV imaging to assess patient set-up enabled continuation of TD. Increases in OTT could not be eliminated completely, however, for 21.5% of patients who experienced treatment adjustments the implementation of contingencies effectively prevented them exceeding Royal College of Radiologists guidance of 2-day extension in OTT.

Advances in knowledge: We believe this radiographer-led project is the first service evaluation reporting the practical effects on treatment of a LRP and impact of clinical contingencies used to mitigate and limit unscheduled interruptions in treatment and minimize the extension of OTT for patients during the transition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信