利用社交媒体了解患者对上腹部深下穿支皮瓣重建的看法。

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006704
Caroline J Cushman, Andrew F Ibrahim, Lauren Dodson, Peyton Scott, Evan J Hernandez, Nicholas T Haddock, Brendan J MacKay
{"title":"利用社交媒体了解患者对上腹部深下穿支皮瓣重建的看法。","authors":"Caroline J Cushman, Andrew F Ibrahim, Lauren Dodson, Peyton Scott, Evan J Hernandez, Nicholas T Haddock, Brendan J MacKay","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction due to its muscle-preserving technique and favorable outcomes compared with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. With rising interest in DIEP flaps, especially amid concerns over silicone implants and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous-related complications, understanding patient perceptions through social media has become increasingly relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1000 social media posts from Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) was conducted to assess patient perspectives on DIEP flap reconstruction. Posts, collected between January 2015 and June 2024, were analyzed for demographics, reported outcomes, complications, and overall tone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most posts (94.0%) were made by women, predominantly White (74.0%), with 63.7% written postoperatively. Tone was largely neutral (49.9%), with Instagram showing higher positivity (50.0%) than Facebook or X. Reported complications appeared in 159 posts, with cosmetic issues and wound healing being the most common. Engagement metrics showed no significant difference in likes for complication-related posts on Facebook (<i>P</i> = 0.6381) or Instagram (<i>P</i> = 0.27). However, Instagram posts about complications received significantly more comments (<i>P</i> = 0.0124), whereas Facebook did not (<i>P</i> = 0.0969).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media offers a valuable lens into patient experiences with DIEP flap reconstruction. The majority of posts reflected neutral-to-positive sentiment, though cosmetic concerns and complications were frequently discussed. These findings can help clinicians better understand patient concerns, improve preoperative education, and enhance recovery support.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Social Media to Understand Patient Perceptions of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline J Cushman, Andrew F Ibrahim, Lauren Dodson, Peyton Scott, Evan J Hernandez, Nicholas T Haddock, Brendan J MacKay\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction due to its muscle-preserving technique and favorable outcomes compared with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. With rising interest in DIEP flaps, especially amid concerns over silicone implants and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous-related complications, understanding patient perceptions through social media has become increasingly relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1000 social media posts from Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) was conducted to assess patient perspectives on DIEP flap reconstruction. Posts, collected between January 2015 and June 2024, were analyzed for demographics, reported outcomes, complications, and overall tone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most posts (94.0%) were made by women, predominantly White (74.0%), with 63.7% written postoperatively. Tone was largely neutral (49.9%), with Instagram showing higher positivity (50.0%) than Facebook or X. Reported complications appeared in 159 posts, with cosmetic issues and wound healing being the most common. Engagement metrics showed no significant difference in likes for complication-related posts on Facebook (<i>P</i> = 0.6381) or Instagram (<i>P</i> = 0.27). However, Instagram posts about complications received significantly more comments (<i>P</i> = 0.0124), whereas Facebook did not (<i>P</i> = 0.0969).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social media offers a valuable lens into patient experiences with DIEP flap reconstruction. The majority of posts reflected neutral-to-positive sentiment, though cosmetic concerns and complications were frequently discussed. These findings can help clinicians better understand patient concerns, improve preoperative education, and enhance recovery support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"e6704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与腹直肌横断面肌皮瓣相比,腹下深穿支(DIEP)皮瓣由于其保留肌肉的技术和良好的效果,被认为是自体乳房重建的金标准。随着人们对DIEP皮瓣的兴趣日益浓厚,尤其是对硅胶植入物和腹横直肌相关并发症的担忧,通过社交媒体了解患者的感受变得越来越重要。方法:回顾性分析来自Facebook、Instagram和X(以前是Twitter)的1000个社交媒体帖子,评估患者对DIEP皮瓣重建的看法。2015年1月至2024年6月期间收集的帖子,分析了人口统计学、报告的结果、并发症和总体基调。结果:绝大多数职位(94.0%)为女性,以白人为主(74.0%),其中63.7%为术后撰写。人们的态度基本上是中性的(49.9%),Instagram上的积极态度高于Facebook或x(50.0%)。159个帖子中出现了并发症,其中最常见的是美容问题和伤口愈合。参与指标显示,Facebook (P = 0.6381)或Instagram (P = 0.27)上与并发症相关的帖子的点赞量没有显著差异。然而,Instagram上关于并发症的帖子得到了更多的评论(P = 0.0124),而Facebook上没有(P = 0.0969)。结论:社交媒体为了解DIEP皮瓣重建的患者体验提供了有价值的视角。大多数帖子反映了中性到积极的情绪,尽管人们经常讨论美容问题和并发症。这些发现可以帮助临床医生更好地了解患者的担忧,改善术前教育,加强康复支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Social Media to Understand Patient Perceptions of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction.

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction due to its muscle-preserving technique and favorable outcomes compared with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. With rising interest in DIEP flaps, especially amid concerns over silicone implants and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous-related complications, understanding patient perceptions through social media has become increasingly relevant.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1000 social media posts from Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) was conducted to assess patient perspectives on DIEP flap reconstruction. Posts, collected between January 2015 and June 2024, were analyzed for demographics, reported outcomes, complications, and overall tone.

Results: Most posts (94.0%) were made by women, predominantly White (74.0%), with 63.7% written postoperatively. Tone was largely neutral (49.9%), with Instagram showing higher positivity (50.0%) than Facebook or X. Reported complications appeared in 159 posts, with cosmetic issues and wound healing being the most common. Engagement metrics showed no significant difference in likes for complication-related posts on Facebook (P = 0.6381) or Instagram (P = 0.27). However, Instagram posts about complications received significantly more comments (P = 0.0124), whereas Facebook did not (P = 0.0969).

Conclusions: Social media offers a valuable lens into patient experiences with DIEP flap reconstruction. The majority of posts reflected neutral-to-positive sentiment, though cosmetic concerns and complications were frequently discussed. These findings can help clinicians better understand patient concerns, improve preoperative education, and enhance recovery support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信