COVID-19疫苗态度和信念的潜在类别分析:通过芝加哥社区参与联盟(CEAL)计划进行的社区调查结果。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Milkie Vu, Jimin Yeom, Duy Trinh, Jane Gou, Timothy Hong, Marym Zaheeruddin, Jessica Bishop-Royse, Madison Hartstein, Bonnie Spring, David Moskowitz, Anh Doan, Molly Martin
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗态度和信念的潜在类别分析:通过芝加哥社区参与联盟(CEAL)计划进行的社区调查结果。","authors":"Milkie Vu, Jimin Yeom, Duy Trinh, Jane Gou, Timothy Hong, Marym Zaheeruddin, Jessica Bishop-Royse, Madison Hartstein, Bonnie Spring, David Moskowitz, Anh Doan, Molly Martin","doi":"10.1007/s10900-025-01472-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the U.S., responses to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine varied widely, with contrasting perceptions of the vaccine. We aimed to characterize distinct groups of respondents regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from the 2021-2023 Common Survey (n = 852), collected in Chicago using a community-based participatory approach focusing on communities with low COVID-19 vaccination. Participants answered eight questions about vaccine-related perceptions. We conducted a latent class analysis in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 623 female participants (73.1%), 482 Black participants (56.6%), 259 Hispanic/Latino(a) participants (30.4%), 26 Asian participants (3.1%), and 261 participants with a college degree (30.6%). In a four-class model, Class 1 (skeptic) included 153 participants (18.0%) with low confidence in vaccine safety, effectiveness, and potential to get life back to normal. Class 2 (uncertain) included 163 participants (19.1%) who mostly indicated uncertainty. Class 3 (support with concerns) included 266 participants (31.2%) who recognized many vaccine benefits but also had concerns about its rapid development and \"not being studied in people like me.\" Class 4 (pro-vaccine) included 270 participants (31.7%) with high confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and social approval of vaccination. Interestingly, both the skeptic and pro-vaccine groups had somewhat similar agreement with the statement \"not enough information on COVID vaccine interaction.\" Class assignments varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Socioeconomic hardships were associated with a lower likelihood of being in the \"pro-vaccine\" group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the distinct classes of vaccine beliefs, tailored public health messaging is needed to enhance vaccine confidence and uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Latent Class Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes and Beliefs: Results from a Community Survey Conducted Via the Chicagoland Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) Program.\",\"authors\":\"Milkie Vu, Jimin Yeom, Duy Trinh, Jane Gou, Timothy Hong, Marym Zaheeruddin, Jessica Bishop-Royse, Madison Hartstein, Bonnie Spring, David Moskowitz, Anh Doan, Molly Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10900-025-01472-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the U.S., responses to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine varied widely, with contrasting perceptions of the vaccine. We aimed to characterize distinct groups of respondents regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from the 2021-2023 Common Survey (n = 852), collected in Chicago using a community-based participatory approach focusing on communities with low COVID-19 vaccination. Participants answered eight questions about vaccine-related perceptions. We conducted a latent class analysis in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 623 female participants (73.1%), 482 Black participants (56.6%), 259 Hispanic/Latino(a) participants (30.4%), 26 Asian participants (3.1%), and 261 participants with a college degree (30.6%). In a four-class model, Class 1 (skeptic) included 153 participants (18.0%) with low confidence in vaccine safety, effectiveness, and potential to get life back to normal. Class 2 (uncertain) included 163 participants (19.1%) who mostly indicated uncertainty. Class 3 (support with concerns) included 266 participants (31.2%) who recognized many vaccine benefits but also had concerns about its rapid development and \\\"not being studied in people like me.\\\" Class 4 (pro-vaccine) included 270 participants (31.7%) with high confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and social approval of vaccination. Interestingly, both the skeptic and pro-vaccine groups had somewhat similar agreement with the statement \\\"not enough information on COVID vaccine interaction.\\\" Class assignments varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Socioeconomic hardships were associated with a lower likelihood of being in the \\\"pro-vaccine\\\" group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the distinct classes of vaccine beliefs, tailored public health messaging is needed to enhance vaccine confidence and uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-025-01472-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-025-01472-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,对COVID-19疫苗推出的反应差异很大,对疫苗的看法截然不同。我们的目的是描述不同群体的受访者对COVID-19疫苗的看法。方法:数据来自芝加哥2021-2023年共同调查(n = 852),采用以社区为基础的参与式方法收集,重点关注COVID-19疫苗接种率低的社区。参与者回答了关于疫苗相关认知的8个问题。结果:样本包括623名女性参与者(73.1%),482名黑人参与者(56.6%),259名西班牙裔/拉丁裔(a)参与者(30.4%),26名亚洲参与者(3.1%)和261名具有大学学位的参与者(30.6%)。在四类模型中,1类(怀疑论者)包括153名参与者(18.0%),他们对疫苗的安全性、有效性和恢复正常生活的潜力缺乏信心。第2类(不确定)包括163名参与者(19.1%),他们大多表示不确定。第3类(有顾虑的支持)包括266名参与者(31.2%),他们认识到疫苗的许多好处,但也对疫苗的快速发展和“没有在像我这样的人身上进行研究”表示担忧。第4类(亲疫苗)包括270名参与者(31.7%),他们对疫苗的安全性和有效性有很高的信心,对接种疫苗有很高的社会认可。有趣的是,怀疑论者和支持疫苗的团体都对“关于COVID疫苗相互作用的信息不足”的说法有类似的看法。课堂作业因社会人口特征而异。社会经济困难与加入“支持疫苗”组的可能性较低有关。结论:鉴于不同种类的疫苗信念,需要有针对性的公共卫生信息来增强疫苗的信心和吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Latent Class Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Attitudes and Beliefs: Results from a Community Survey Conducted Via the Chicagoland Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) Program.

Background: In the U.S., responses to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine varied widely, with contrasting perceptions of the vaccine. We aimed to characterize distinct groups of respondents regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions.

Methods: Data came from the 2021-2023 Common Survey (n = 852), collected in Chicago using a community-based participatory approach focusing on communities with low COVID-19 vaccination. Participants answered eight questions about vaccine-related perceptions. We conducted a latent class analysis in R.

Results: The sample included 623 female participants (73.1%), 482 Black participants (56.6%), 259 Hispanic/Latino(a) participants (30.4%), 26 Asian participants (3.1%), and 261 participants with a college degree (30.6%). In a four-class model, Class 1 (skeptic) included 153 participants (18.0%) with low confidence in vaccine safety, effectiveness, and potential to get life back to normal. Class 2 (uncertain) included 163 participants (19.1%) who mostly indicated uncertainty. Class 3 (support with concerns) included 266 participants (31.2%) who recognized many vaccine benefits but also had concerns about its rapid development and "not being studied in people like me." Class 4 (pro-vaccine) included 270 participants (31.7%) with high confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness and social approval of vaccination. Interestingly, both the skeptic and pro-vaccine groups had somewhat similar agreement with the statement "not enough information on COVID vaccine interaction." Class assignments varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Socioeconomic hardships were associated with a lower likelihood of being in the "pro-vaccine" group.

Conclusions: Given the distinct classes of vaccine beliefs, tailored public health messaging is needed to enhance vaccine confidence and uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信