Yu Gao, Lin Han, Jie Li, Xue Lu, Ping Wang, Shasha Du, Yunfei Zhang, Tian-Jing Cai, Qing-Jie Liu, Yumin Lyu
{"title":"体外x射线辐照人外周血半自动分析双中心染色体剂量效应曲线的建立与验证。","authors":"Yu Gao, Lin Han, Jie Li, Xue Lu, Ping Wang, Shasha Du, Yunfei Zhang, Tian-Jing Cai, Qing-Jie Liu, Yumin Lyu","doi":"10.1080/09553002.2025.2494549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish and validate a dose-response curve for dicentric chromosomes (DC) induced by X-rays in human peripheral blood in vitro using semi-automated scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peripheral blood samples were collected from three healthy individuals and exposed to X-ray doses of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Gy at a dose rate of 1.158 Gy/min. Dicentric chromosomes in metaphase were scored both full- and semi-automatically, and a dose-response curve was generated with CABAS software based on dicentric yields. Dose estimations were then performed for 12 biodosimetry standard samples and one sample from a patient with X-ray-induced skin injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dicentric yields increased with X-ray doses from 0 to 5 Gy (<i>r</i> = 0.943, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The dose-response association followed a linear-quadratic model: <i>Y</i> = 0.0002 (± 0.0001) + 0.0379 (± 0.0032) × <i>D +</i> 0.0253 (± 0.0014) × <i>D<sup>2</sup></i> (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.998, <i>P</i> < 0.01), where <i>Y</i> represents dicentric yields and <i>D</i> is the dose. The estimated dose for 12 validation samples aligned closely with actual doses. The estimated whole-body average absorbed dose for the patient was 0.73 Gy, with observed DC over-dispersion suggesting partial body exposure. By using the Dolphin model, this dose was refined to 2.22 Gy and estimated irradiated body volume was 35.94%, consistent with clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dose-response curve developed using semi-automated scoring offer a reliable and efficient approach for dose estimation and clinical diagnosis in nuclear radiation emergencies. It could also support retrospective biodosimetry of partial-body, non-uniform radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94057,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiation biology","volume":" ","pages":"590-597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment and verification of the dose-effect curve of dicentric chromosomes by semi-automatic analysis of human peripheral blood irradiated by X-ray <i>in vitro</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Gao, Lin Han, Jie Li, Xue Lu, Ping Wang, Shasha Du, Yunfei Zhang, Tian-Jing Cai, Qing-Jie Liu, Yumin Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09553002.2025.2494549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish and validate a dose-response curve for dicentric chromosomes (DC) induced by X-rays in human peripheral blood in vitro using semi-automated scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peripheral blood samples were collected from three healthy individuals and exposed to X-ray doses of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Gy at a dose rate of 1.158 Gy/min. Dicentric chromosomes in metaphase were scored both full- and semi-automatically, and a dose-response curve was generated with CABAS software based on dicentric yields. Dose estimations were then performed for 12 biodosimetry standard samples and one sample from a patient with X-ray-induced skin injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dicentric yields increased with X-ray doses from 0 to 5 Gy (<i>r</i> = 0.943, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The dose-response association followed a linear-quadratic model: <i>Y</i> = 0.0002 (± 0.0001) + 0.0379 (± 0.0032) × <i>D +</i> 0.0253 (± 0.0014) × <i>D<sup>2</sup></i> (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.998, <i>P</i> < 0.01), where <i>Y</i> represents dicentric yields and <i>D</i> is the dose. The estimated dose for 12 validation samples aligned closely with actual doses. The estimated whole-body average absorbed dose for the patient was 0.73 Gy, with observed DC over-dispersion suggesting partial body exposure. By using the Dolphin model, this dose was refined to 2.22 Gy and estimated irradiated body volume was 35.94%, consistent with clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dose-response curve developed using semi-automated scoring offer a reliable and efficient approach for dose estimation and clinical diagnosis in nuclear radiation emergencies. It could also support retrospective biodosimetry of partial-body, non-uniform radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of radiation biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"590-597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of radiation biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2025.2494549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiation biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2025.2494549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishment and verification of the dose-effect curve of dicentric chromosomes by semi-automatic analysis of human peripheral blood irradiated by X-ray in vitro.
Objective: To establish and validate a dose-response curve for dicentric chromosomes (DC) induced by X-rays in human peripheral blood in vitro using semi-automated scoring.
Methods: Peripheral blood samples were collected from three healthy individuals and exposed to X-ray doses of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Gy at a dose rate of 1.158 Gy/min. Dicentric chromosomes in metaphase were scored both full- and semi-automatically, and a dose-response curve was generated with CABAS software based on dicentric yields. Dose estimations were then performed for 12 biodosimetry standard samples and one sample from a patient with X-ray-induced skin injury.
Results: Dicentric yields increased with X-ray doses from 0 to 5 Gy (r = 0.943, P < 0.01). The dose-response association followed a linear-quadratic model: Y = 0.0002 (± 0.0001) + 0.0379 (± 0.0032) × D + 0.0253 (± 0.0014) × D2 (R2 = 0.998, P < 0.01), where Y represents dicentric yields and D is the dose. The estimated dose for 12 validation samples aligned closely with actual doses. The estimated whole-body average absorbed dose for the patient was 0.73 Gy, with observed DC over-dispersion suggesting partial body exposure. By using the Dolphin model, this dose was refined to 2.22 Gy and estimated irradiated body volume was 35.94%, consistent with clinical diagnosis.
Conclusions: The dose-response curve developed using semi-automated scoring offer a reliable and efficient approach for dose estimation and clinical diagnosis in nuclear radiation emergencies. It could also support retrospective biodosimetry of partial-body, non-uniform radiation exposure.