Arash Kazemi, Jeremy C Reitinger, Carol B Toris, Vikas Gulati, Shan Fan, David M Reed, Sayoko E Moroi, Arthur J Sit
{"title":"健康受试者对拉坦前列素IOP反应的房水动力学变化和预测因素。","authors":"Arash Kazemi, Jeremy C Reitinger, Carol B Toris, Vikas Gulati, Shan Fan, David M Reed, Sayoko E Moroi, Arthur J Sit","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In our study of the factors predictive of latanoprost response, we found that normotensive subjects with higher intraocular pressure, lower uveoscleral outflow, and higher body mass index had a greater response to 1-week treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate relationships between variable intraocular pressure (IOP) responses to latanoprost and participant characteristics, baseline values and changes in aqueous humor dynamics (AHD) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 226 eyes from 113 healthy participants. AHD parameters measured at baseline and after 1-week treatment with latanoprost included: IOP by pneumatonometry, episcleral venous pressure (EVP) by venomanometry, aqueous humor flow rate by fluorophotometry, outflow facility by 2-minute pneumatonography, and uveoscleral outflow calculated using the modified Goldmann equation. IOP responses were categorized into 4 groups: non-responders (<10% reduction), all-responders (≥10% reduction), medium-responders (10-20% reduction), and high-responders (≥20% reduction). Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze treatment effects and compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline IOP was higher in high-responders than medium-responders and non-responders ( P =0.007 and P <0.001, respectively). Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in high-responders and all-responders compared to non-responders ( P =0.02 and P =0.03, respectively). Responders had lower baseline uveoscleral outflow ( P =0.03). There were no significant differences in other baseline characteristics including EVP, outflow facility, and aqueous flow rate between the 4 groups. IOP decreased while outflow facility and uveoscleral outflow increased after latanoprost treatment in all responder groups but did not change in non-responders. EVP and aqueous flow rate did not change significantly in any group. The change in uveoscleral outflow was greater in high-responders than in non-responders ( P =0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In healthy subjects, higher baseline IOP, lower uveoscleral outflow and higher BMI are predictors of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost. A greater increase in uveoscleral outflow is responsible for this larger response.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aqueous Humor Dynamics Changes and Predictors of IOP Response to Latanoprost in Healthy Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Kazemi, Jeremy C Reitinger, Carol B Toris, Vikas Gulati, Shan Fan, David M Reed, Sayoko E Moroi, Arthur J Sit\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>In our study of the factors predictive of latanoprost response, we found that normotensive subjects with higher intraocular pressure, lower uveoscleral outflow, and higher body mass index had a greater response to 1-week treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate relationships between variable intraocular pressure (IOP) responses to latanoprost and participant characteristics, baseline values and changes in aqueous humor dynamics (AHD) parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 226 eyes from 113 healthy participants. AHD parameters measured at baseline and after 1-week treatment with latanoprost included: IOP by pneumatonometry, episcleral venous pressure (EVP) by venomanometry, aqueous humor flow rate by fluorophotometry, outflow facility by 2-minute pneumatonography, and uveoscleral outflow calculated using the modified Goldmann equation. IOP responses were categorized into 4 groups: non-responders (<10% reduction), all-responders (≥10% reduction), medium-responders (10-20% reduction), and high-responders (≥20% reduction). Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze treatment effects and compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline IOP was higher in high-responders than medium-responders and non-responders ( P =0.007 and P <0.001, respectively). Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in high-responders and all-responders compared to non-responders ( P =0.02 and P =0.03, respectively). Responders had lower baseline uveoscleral outflow ( P =0.03). There were no significant differences in other baseline characteristics including EVP, outflow facility, and aqueous flow rate between the 4 groups. IOP decreased while outflow facility and uveoscleral outflow increased after latanoprost treatment in all responder groups but did not change in non-responders. EVP and aqueous flow rate did not change significantly in any group. The change in uveoscleral outflow was greater in high-responders than in non-responders ( P =0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In healthy subjects, higher baseline IOP, lower uveoscleral outflow and higher BMI are predictors of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost. A greater increase in uveoscleral outflow is responsible for this larger response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aqueous Humor Dynamics Changes and Predictors of IOP Response to Latanoprost in Healthy Subjects.
Prcis: In our study of the factors predictive of latanoprost response, we found that normotensive subjects with higher intraocular pressure, lower uveoscleral outflow, and higher body mass index had a greater response to 1-week treatment.
Purpose: To evaluate relationships between variable intraocular pressure (IOP) responses to latanoprost and participant characteristics, baseline values and changes in aqueous humor dynamics (AHD) parameters.
Methods: We assessed 226 eyes from 113 healthy participants. AHD parameters measured at baseline and after 1-week treatment with latanoprost included: IOP by pneumatonometry, episcleral venous pressure (EVP) by venomanometry, aqueous humor flow rate by fluorophotometry, outflow facility by 2-minute pneumatonography, and uveoscleral outflow calculated using the modified Goldmann equation. IOP responses were categorized into 4 groups: non-responders (<10% reduction), all-responders (≥10% reduction), medium-responders (10-20% reduction), and high-responders (≥20% reduction). Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze treatment effects and compare groups.
Results: Baseline IOP was higher in high-responders than medium-responders and non-responders ( P =0.007 and P <0.001, respectively). Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in high-responders and all-responders compared to non-responders ( P =0.02 and P =0.03, respectively). Responders had lower baseline uveoscleral outflow ( P =0.03). There were no significant differences in other baseline characteristics including EVP, outflow facility, and aqueous flow rate between the 4 groups. IOP decreased while outflow facility and uveoscleral outflow increased after latanoprost treatment in all responder groups but did not change in non-responders. EVP and aqueous flow rate did not change significantly in any group. The change in uveoscleral outflow was greater in high-responders than in non-responders ( P =0.004).
Conclusions: In healthy subjects, higher baseline IOP, lower uveoscleral outflow and higher BMI are predictors of a greater IOP reduction by latanoprost. A greater increase in uveoscleral outflow is responsible for this larger response.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.