早期高效、低效治疗对多发性硬化症患者血清神经丝轻链及胶质原纤维酸性蛋白水平的影响。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1177/13524585251335521
Evan Madill, Vanessa Moreira Ferreira, Brian Healy, Jonathan Zurawski, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Howard L Weiner, Tanuja Chitnis
{"title":"早期高效、低效治疗对多发性硬化症患者血清神经丝轻链及胶质原纤维酸性蛋白水平的影响。","authors":"Evan Madill, Vanessa Moreira Ferreira, Brian Healy, Jonathan Zurawski, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Howard L Weiner, Tanuja Chitnis","doi":"10.1177/13524585251335521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with high-efficacy and low-efficacy early therapy in multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Evan Madill, Vanessa Moreira Ferreira, Brian Healy, Jonathan Zurawski, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Howard L Weiner, Tanuja Chitnis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585251335521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"944-954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251335521\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251335521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经丝轻链(NfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)与多发性硬化症(MS)的预后相关。我们比较了高效早期治疗(HEET)和低效早期治疗(LEET)在疾病改善治疗(DMT)开始时和之后几年对血清NfL和GFAP的影响。方法:在本中心诊断为多发性硬化症的成人在5年内出现症状。DMT-naïve患者在治疗开始前一年的血清NfL和GFAP记录以及治疗开始后6-36个月的随访样本被纳入“开始前”队列。那些在DMT开始后具有基线并在5年内随访样本的患者被纳入“开始后”队列。结果:起始前患者155例(HEET: 85, LEET: 70),起始后患者213例(HEET: 55, LEET: 158)。在DMT开始后,NfL水平降低,但在两个队列中,HEET和LEET之间没有显著差异。GFAP没有受到HEET或LEET的实质性影响。结论:HEET和LEET对NfL降低的差异可能小于预期,这可能反映了在现实生活中选择DMT时考虑了疾病活动风险。HEET或LEET对GFAP的影响最小,至少在几年内是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with high-efficacy and low-efficacy early therapy in multiple sclerosis.

Introduction: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards.

Methods: Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort.

Results: There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET.

Conclusion: The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信