Evan Madill, Vanessa Moreira Ferreira, Brian Healy, Jonathan Zurawski, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Howard L Weiner, Tanuja Chitnis
{"title":"早期高效、低效治疗对多发性硬化症患者血清神经丝轻链及胶质原纤维酸性蛋白水平的影响。","authors":"Evan Madill, Vanessa Moreira Ferreira, Brian Healy, Jonathan Zurawski, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Howard L Weiner, Tanuja Chitnis","doi":"10.1177/13524585251335521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with high-efficacy and low-efficacy early therapy in multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Evan Madill, Vanessa Moreira Ferreira, Brian Healy, Jonathan Zurawski, Mariann Polgar-Turcsanyi, Howard L Weiner, Tanuja Chitnis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585251335521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"944-954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251335521\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251335521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Change in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with high-efficacy and low-efficacy early therapy in multiple sclerosis.
Introduction: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards.
Methods: Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort.
Results: There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET.
Conclusion: The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system.
The journal for your research in the following areas:
* __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics
* __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology
* __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures
* __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management
Print ISSN: 1352-4585