土耳其covid-19大流行之前和期间产后抑郁症患病率的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zekiye Karaçam, Pirozhan Ekin, Hilal Bal Şaraldı
{"title":"土耳其covid-19大流行之前和期间产后抑郁症患病率的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Zekiye Karaçam, Pirozhan Ekin, Hilal Bal Şaraldı","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02905-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the prevalence of probably postpartum depression and the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence of probably postpartum depression based on the results of the studies in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. The key words postpartum depression or postnatal depression and Turkey were searched in the electronic databases of PubMed, EbscoHost, OVID Journals, Science Direct, Web of Science, ULAKBIM Databases, DergiPARK, TR Dizin, YÖK-Natural Thesis Centre. The systematic review was performed by following PRISMA and COSMOS-E. Data were collected by using a data extraction tool developed by the researchers. The quality of the studies was evaluated by utilizing The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. Obtained data were synthesized with meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample size of 34 studies included in this meta-analysis was 10 236. The cut-off score for the EPDS was considered as ≥ 13 in 30 studies and ≥ 12 in four studies. The pooled probably postpartum depression prevalence was 17.8% (95% CI: 0.153-0.206; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.070-0.383). It was found to be 16.3% before the pandemic (95% CI: 0.065-0.358; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.065-0.358) and increased to 20.2% during the pandemic (95% CI: 0.068-0.468; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.068-0.468), though the difference was not significant (Q = 1.77; df: 1; p = 0.184). The meta-regression analysis showed that the prevalence of probably postpartum depression did not change depending on the geographical region where the studies were performed, the time of data collection and the cut-off point of the EPDS. However, the studies reported many factors related to women, their infants and families that affected the prevalence of probably postpartum depression.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of probably postpartum depression was very high, increased during the pandemic and was affected by many risk factors. It may be recommended that healthcare professionals take protective and improving measures for the mental health of women at high risk during the perinatal period and provide early diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the prevalence of probably postpartum depression before and during the covid-19 pandemic in Turkey: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zekiye Karaçam, Pirozhan Ekin, Hilal Bal Şaraldı\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02905-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the prevalence of probably postpartum depression and the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence of probably postpartum depression based on the results of the studies in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. The key words postpartum depression or postnatal depression and Turkey were searched in the electronic databases of PubMed, EbscoHost, OVID Journals, Science Direct, Web of Science, ULAKBIM Databases, DergiPARK, TR Dizin, YÖK-Natural Thesis Centre. The systematic review was performed by following PRISMA and COSMOS-E. Data were collected by using a data extraction tool developed by the researchers. The quality of the studies was evaluated by utilizing The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. Obtained data were synthesized with meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample size of 34 studies included in this meta-analysis was 10 236. The cut-off score for the EPDS was considered as ≥ 13 in 30 studies and ≥ 12 in four studies. The pooled probably postpartum depression prevalence was 17.8% (95% CI: 0.153-0.206; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.070-0.383). It was found to be 16.3% before the pandemic (95% CI: 0.065-0.358; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.065-0.358) and increased to 20.2% during the pandemic (95% CI: 0.068-0.468; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.068-0.468), though the difference was not significant (Q = 1.77; df: 1; p = 0.184). The meta-regression analysis showed that the prevalence of probably postpartum depression did not change depending on the geographical region where the studies were performed, the time of data collection and the cut-off point of the EPDS. However, the studies reported many factors related to women, their infants and families that affected the prevalence of probably postpartum depression.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of probably postpartum depression was very high, increased during the pandemic and was affected by many risk factors. It may be recommended that healthcare professionals take protective and improving measures for the mental health of women at high risk during the perinatal period and provide early diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and care services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02905-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02905-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据土耳其的研究结果,确定可能的产后抑郁症患病率以及COVID-19大流行对可能的产后抑郁症患病率的影响。方法:系统回顾和荟萃分析的横断面研究。在PubMed、EbscoHost、OVID期刊、Science Direct、Web of Science、ULAKBIM数据库、DergiPARK、TR Dizin、YÖK-Natural论文中心等电子数据库中检索关键词产后抑郁症或产后抑郁症和土耳其。系统评价采用PRISMA和COSMOS-E进行。数据是通过研究人员开发的数据提取工具收集的。研究的质量是通过使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的分析横截面研究的关键评估清单来评估的。对所得资料进行meta分析、叙事综合、亚组分析和meta回归分析。结果:本荟萃分析纳入34项研究的总样本量为10236。EPDS的截止评分在30项研究中为≥13分,在4项研究中为≥12分。合并产后抑郁症患病率为17.8% (95% CI: 0.153-0.206;95%预测区间:0.070-0.383)。大流行前发现为16.3% (95% CI: 0.065-0.358;95%预测区间:0.065-0.358),并在大流行期间增加到20.2% (95% CI: 0.068-0.468;95%预测区间:0.068 ~ 0.468),但差异不显著(Q = 1.77;df: 1;p = 0.184)。meta回归分析显示,产后抑郁症的患病率并没有因研究的地理区域、数据收集时间和EPDS的分界点而改变。然而,这些研究报告了许多与妇女、她们的婴儿和家庭有关的因素,这些因素可能会影响产后抑郁症的患病率。结果:本荟萃分析显示,产后抑郁症的患病率非常高,在大流行期间增加,并受到许多危险因素的影响。可建议保健专业人员采取保护和改善围产期高危妇女心理健康的措施,并提供早期诊断、治疗、监测和护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the prevalence of probably postpartum depression before and during the covid-19 pandemic in Turkey: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of probably postpartum depression and the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence of probably postpartum depression based on the results of the studies in Turkey.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. The key words postpartum depression or postnatal depression and Turkey were searched in the electronic databases of PubMed, EbscoHost, OVID Journals, Science Direct, Web of Science, ULAKBIM Databases, DergiPARK, TR Dizin, YÖK-Natural Thesis Centre. The systematic review was performed by following PRISMA and COSMOS-E. Data were collected by using a data extraction tool developed by the researchers. The quality of the studies was evaluated by utilizing The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. Obtained data were synthesized with meta-analysis, narrative synthesis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

Results: The total sample size of 34 studies included in this meta-analysis was 10 236. The cut-off score for the EPDS was considered as ≥ 13 in 30 studies and ≥ 12 in four studies. The pooled probably postpartum depression prevalence was 17.8% (95% CI: 0.153-0.206; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.070-0.383). It was found to be 16.3% before the pandemic (95% CI: 0.065-0.358; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.065-0.358) and increased to 20.2% during the pandemic (95% CI: 0.068-0.468; 95% Prediction Interval: 0.068-0.468), though the difference was not significant (Q = 1.77; df: 1; p = 0.184). The meta-regression analysis showed that the prevalence of probably postpartum depression did not change depending on the geographical region where the studies were performed, the time of data collection and the cut-off point of the EPDS. However, the studies reported many factors related to women, their infants and families that affected the prevalence of probably postpartum depression.

Outcomes: This meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of probably postpartum depression was very high, increased during the pandemic and was affected by many risk factors. It may be recommended that healthcare professionals take protective and improving measures for the mental health of women at high risk during the perinatal period and provide early diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and care services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信