Melissa N Poulsen, Cara M Nordberg, Joseph DeWalle, Meghann Reeder, Wade Berrettini, Brian S Schwartz
{"title":"宾夕法尼亚州城乡范围内社区社会经济因素与阿片类药物使用障碍的关联:一项基于电子健康记录的病例对照研究","authors":"Melissa N Poulsen, Cara M Nordberg, Joseph DeWalle, Meghann Reeder, Wade Berrettini, Brian S Schwartz","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02897-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To elucidate the role of community socioeconomic conditions in creating opioid-related risk environments, we assessed community-level socioeconomic measures in association with opioid use disorder (OUD) across a diverse geography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a case-control study using medical records (2012-2020) from a Pennsylvania health system to identify cases of OUD (n = 14,674) and controls (n = 58,696; frequency-matched on age, sex, year, medical record duration). Residential addresses were used to assign community-level measures: community socioeconomic deprivation (CSD), high proportional housing costs (HPHC), population in service occupations (PSO), and community credit score (CCS). Logistic regression analyzed associations of community type (city census tracts [CCT], boroughs, townships) and community socioeconomic features (stratified by community type) with OUD, adjusting for demographics and individual-level socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCT or borough (versus township) residence was associated with higher OUD odds. CSD, HPHC, and CCS were associated with OUD across community types; PSO was only associated in CCTs. The highest (versus lowest) level of CSD was associated (odds ratio, 95% CI) with higher OUD odds among individuals in townships (1.18 [1.03, 1.36]), boroughs (1.34 [1.09, 1.63]), and CCTs (1.46 [1.13, 1.88]). \"Good\" (versus \"high fair\") CCS was associated with lower odds in townships (0.78 [0.71, 0.86]), boroughs (0.56 [0.41, 0.77]), and CCTs (0.73 [0.44, 1.22]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate poor community socioeconomic conditions are related to higher OUD risk, highlight the value of research regarding opioid-related risk environments, and suggest structural and policy interventions, such as vocational training and rent subsidies, as important for addressing the root causes of OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of community socioeconomic factors and opioid use disorder across an urban-to-rural spectrum in Pennsylvania: an electronic health record-based case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa N Poulsen, Cara M Nordberg, Joseph DeWalle, Meghann Reeder, Wade Berrettini, Brian S Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02897-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To elucidate the role of community socioeconomic conditions in creating opioid-related risk environments, we assessed community-level socioeconomic measures in association with opioid use disorder (OUD) across a diverse geography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a case-control study using medical records (2012-2020) from a Pennsylvania health system to identify cases of OUD (n = 14,674) and controls (n = 58,696; frequency-matched on age, sex, year, medical record duration). Residential addresses were used to assign community-level measures: community socioeconomic deprivation (CSD), high proportional housing costs (HPHC), population in service occupations (PSO), and community credit score (CCS). Logistic regression analyzed associations of community type (city census tracts [CCT], boroughs, townships) and community socioeconomic features (stratified by community type) with OUD, adjusting for demographics and individual-level socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCT or borough (versus township) residence was associated with higher OUD odds. CSD, HPHC, and CCS were associated with OUD across community types; PSO was only associated in CCTs. The highest (versus lowest) level of CSD was associated (odds ratio, 95% CI) with higher OUD odds among individuals in townships (1.18 [1.03, 1.36]), boroughs (1.34 [1.09, 1.63]), and CCTs (1.46 [1.13, 1.88]). \\\"Good\\\" (versus \\\"high fair\\\") CCS was associated with lower odds in townships (0.78 [0.71, 0.86]), boroughs (0.56 [0.41, 0.77]), and CCTs (0.73 [0.44, 1.22]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate poor community socioeconomic conditions are related to higher OUD risk, highlight the value of research regarding opioid-related risk environments, and suggest structural and policy interventions, such as vocational training and rent subsidies, as important for addressing the root causes of OUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02897-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02897-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Associations of community socioeconomic factors and opioid use disorder across an urban-to-rural spectrum in Pennsylvania: an electronic health record-based case-control study.
Purpose: To elucidate the role of community socioeconomic conditions in creating opioid-related risk environments, we assessed community-level socioeconomic measures in association with opioid use disorder (OUD) across a diverse geography.
Methods: We conducted a case-control study using medical records (2012-2020) from a Pennsylvania health system to identify cases of OUD (n = 14,674) and controls (n = 58,696; frequency-matched on age, sex, year, medical record duration). Residential addresses were used to assign community-level measures: community socioeconomic deprivation (CSD), high proportional housing costs (HPHC), population in service occupations (PSO), and community credit score (CCS). Logistic regression analyzed associations of community type (city census tracts [CCT], boroughs, townships) and community socioeconomic features (stratified by community type) with OUD, adjusting for demographics and individual-level socioeconomic status.
Results: CCT or borough (versus township) residence was associated with higher OUD odds. CSD, HPHC, and CCS were associated with OUD across community types; PSO was only associated in CCTs. The highest (versus lowest) level of CSD was associated (odds ratio, 95% CI) with higher OUD odds among individuals in townships (1.18 [1.03, 1.36]), boroughs (1.34 [1.09, 1.63]), and CCTs (1.46 [1.13, 1.88]). "Good" (versus "high fair") CCS was associated with lower odds in townships (0.78 [0.71, 0.86]), boroughs (0.56 [0.41, 0.77]), and CCTs (0.73 [0.44, 1.22]).
Conclusion: Findings indicate poor community socioeconomic conditions are related to higher OUD risk, highlight the value of research regarding opioid-related risk environments, and suggest structural and policy interventions, such as vocational training and rent subsidies, as important for addressing the root causes of OUD.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.