{"title":"今天在实验室诊断侵袭性真菌感染:这都是好消息吗?","authors":"Javier Pemán, Alba Ruiz-Gaitán","doi":"10.1016/j.riam.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the advances in medical science, invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a diagnostic challenge. The increasing prevalence of IFI, driven by immunosuppressive therapies, advances in intensive care and emerging pathogens, underscores the need for early and accurate diagnosis. This review evaluates current laboratory methods for the diagnosis of IFI, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Conventional techniques, including fungal culture, direct microscopy, and histopathology, remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of proven IFIs. These methods allow pathogen isolation, species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing. However, these techniques have limitations in terms of sensitivity and turnaround times. Although microscopy is a rapid technique, its sensitivity and species discrimination profile are limited. Modern serological assays, such as β-d-glucan and galactomannan detection, have improved the diagnostic accuracy of probable IFI cases. Integration of these assays with clinical and radiological findings, enables earlier intervention, although this is accompanied by an increased risk of false positives and necessitates careful clinical correlation. Molecular diagnostics, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR), allow rapid, species-specific identification directly from clinical samples. The advent of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has further improved diagnostic efficiency, particularly for yeast identification, although challenges remain for filamentous fungi. Innovative techniques, such as metagenomic sequencing, lateral-flow assays, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification, offer the potential for rapid and precise detection, even in resource-limited settings. The combination of conventional and innovative methods provides a comprehensive diagnostic framework. The continuous refinement of these tools, in conjunction with multidisciplinary collaboration, is imperative to improve the early diagnostic and targeted treatment of patients with IFI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21291,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing invasive fungal infections in the laboratory today: It's all good news?\",\"authors\":\"Javier Pemán, Alba Ruiz-Gaitán\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.riam.2025.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the advances in medical science, invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a diagnostic challenge. The increasing prevalence of IFI, driven by immunosuppressive therapies, advances in intensive care and emerging pathogens, underscores the need for early and accurate diagnosis. This review evaluates current laboratory methods for the diagnosis of IFI, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Conventional techniques, including fungal culture, direct microscopy, and histopathology, remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of proven IFIs. These methods allow pathogen isolation, species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing. However, these techniques have limitations in terms of sensitivity and turnaround times. Although microscopy is a rapid technique, its sensitivity and species discrimination profile are limited. Modern serological assays, such as β-d-glucan and galactomannan detection, have improved the diagnostic accuracy of probable IFI cases. Integration of these assays with clinical and radiological findings, enables earlier intervention, although this is accompanied by an increased risk of false positives and necessitates careful clinical correlation. Molecular diagnostics, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR), allow rapid, species-specific identification directly from clinical samples. The advent of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has further improved diagnostic efficiency, particularly for yeast identification, although challenges remain for filamentous fungi. Innovative techniques, such as metagenomic sequencing, lateral-flow assays, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification, offer the potential for rapid and precise detection, even in resource-limited settings. The combination of conventional and innovative methods provides a comprehensive diagnostic framework. The continuous refinement of these tools, in conjunction with multidisciplinary collaboration, is imperative to improve the early diagnostic and targeted treatment of patients with IFI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2025.01.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2025.01.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnosing invasive fungal infections in the laboratory today: It's all good news?
Despite the advances in medical science, invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a diagnostic challenge. The increasing prevalence of IFI, driven by immunosuppressive therapies, advances in intensive care and emerging pathogens, underscores the need for early and accurate diagnosis. This review evaluates current laboratory methods for the diagnosis of IFI, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Conventional techniques, including fungal culture, direct microscopy, and histopathology, remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of proven IFIs. These methods allow pathogen isolation, species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing. However, these techniques have limitations in terms of sensitivity and turnaround times. Although microscopy is a rapid technique, its sensitivity and species discrimination profile are limited. Modern serological assays, such as β-d-glucan and galactomannan detection, have improved the diagnostic accuracy of probable IFI cases. Integration of these assays with clinical and radiological findings, enables earlier intervention, although this is accompanied by an increased risk of false positives and necessitates careful clinical correlation. Molecular diagnostics, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR), allow rapid, species-specific identification directly from clinical samples. The advent of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has further improved diagnostic efficiency, particularly for yeast identification, although challenges remain for filamentous fungi. Innovative techniques, such as metagenomic sequencing, lateral-flow assays, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification, offer the potential for rapid and precise detection, even in resource-limited settings. The combination of conventional and innovative methods provides a comprehensive diagnostic framework. The continuous refinement of these tools, in conjunction with multidisciplinary collaboration, is imperative to improve the early diagnostic and targeted treatment of patients with IFI.
期刊介绍:
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología (Ibero-American Journal of Mycology) is the official journal of the Asociación Española de Micología, Asociación Venezolana de Micología and Asociación Argentina de Micología (The Spanish, Venezuelan, and Argentinian Mycology Associations). The Journal gives priority to publishing articles on studies associated with fungi and their pathogenic action on humans and animals, as well as any scientific studies on any aspect of mycology. The Journal also publishes, in Spanish and in English, original articles, reviews, mycology forums, editorials, special articles, notes, and letters to the editor, that have previously gone through a scientific peer review process.