长卵形管中ProTaper Gold和R-Motion系统的成形能力:微计算机断层研究。

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tswj/5825229
Marina da Cunha Isaltino, Wesley Viana de Sousa, Christianne Tavares Velozo Telles, Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa, Diana Santana de Albuquerque
{"title":"长卵形管中ProTaper Gold和R-Motion系统的成形能力:微计算机断层研究。","authors":"Marina da Cunha Isaltino, Wesley Viana de Sousa, Christianne Tavares Velozo Telles, Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa, Diana Santana de Albuquerque","doi":"10.1155/tswj/5825229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b>The aim of this study was to evaluate, by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), the shaping ability and reduction of dentin thickness in mesial and distal surfaces of the ProTaper Gold (PTG; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and R-Motion (RM; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) systems in long-oval canals of lower incisors. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty long-oval lower incisors were selected, compared anatomically, and scanned by micro-CT (SkyScan 1172, Bruker Micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium). The teeth were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to instrumentation technique: PTG and RM. The following morphometric measurements were made on images recorded before and after preparation: volume, surface area, structure model index (SMI), unprepared walls, and dentin thickness parameters were calculated. The Shapiro-Wilk test and Student <i>t</i>-test were used for comparison of the data between the two groups at a significance level of 5%. <b>Results:</b> Significant differences were found in volume (127.60% vs. 69.22%) and reduction in dentin thickness on the distal surface of the root canal, with higher values for PTG compared to RM, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference in surface area (34.79% vs. 26.93%), SMI, and the percentage of unprepared areas (9.43% vs. 12.22%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although GTP resulted in a greater reduction in dentin thickness on the distal surface and volume, there was no difference in the percentage of contact surface and unprepared areas between the two systems, confirming that neither technique was able to completely prepare the long-oval canals of the lower incisors. <b>Clinical Relevance:</b> Despite the technological advances in instruments launched on the market, exhibiting greater flexibility due to their metallurgical properties and short sequences, there is little scientific evidence regarding the new RM instrument, manufactured by FKG Dentaire, and its root canal modeling capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5825229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shaping Ability of the ProTaper Gold and R-Motion Systems in Long-Oval Canals: A Microcomputed Tomography Study.\",\"authors\":\"Marina da Cunha Isaltino, Wesley Viana de Sousa, Christianne Tavares Velozo Telles, Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro, Hugo Victor Dantas, Frederico Barbosa de Sousa, Diana Santana de Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tswj/5825229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b>The aim of this study was to evaluate, by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), the shaping ability and reduction of dentin thickness in mesial and distal surfaces of the ProTaper Gold (PTG; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and R-Motion (RM; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) systems in long-oval canals of lower incisors. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Twenty long-oval lower incisors were selected, compared anatomically, and scanned by micro-CT (SkyScan 1172, Bruker Micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium). The teeth were divided into two groups (<i>n</i> = 10) according to instrumentation technique: PTG and RM. The following morphometric measurements were made on images recorded before and after preparation: volume, surface area, structure model index (SMI), unprepared walls, and dentin thickness parameters were calculated. The Shapiro-Wilk test and Student <i>t</i>-test were used for comparison of the data between the two groups at a significance level of 5%. <b>Results:</b> Significant differences were found in volume (127.60% vs. 69.22%) and reduction in dentin thickness on the distal surface of the root canal, with higher values for PTG compared to RM, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no significant difference in surface area (34.79% vs. 26.93%), SMI, and the percentage of unprepared areas (9.43% vs. 12.22%). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although GTP resulted in a greater reduction in dentin thickness on the distal surface and volume, there was no difference in the percentage of contact surface and unprepared areas between the two systems, confirming that neither technique was able to completely prepare the long-oval canals of the lower incisors. <b>Clinical Relevance:</b> Despite the technological advances in instruments launched on the market, exhibiting greater flexibility due to their metallurgical properties and short sequences, there is little scientific evidence regarding the new RM instrument, manufactured by FKG Dentaire, and its root canal modeling capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"5825229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/5825229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/5825229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过显微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估ProTaper Gold (PTG)近端和远端表面的成形能力和牙本质厚度的减少;Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland)和R-Motion (RM;FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds,瑞士)下门牙长椭圆形管中的系统。材料与方法:选择长椭圆形下切牙20颗,解剖比较,micro-CT扫描(SkyScan 1172, Bruker micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium)。根据内固定技术分为PTG组和RM组(n = 10)。对制备前后记录的图像进行以下形态测量:计算体积、表面积、结构模型指数(SMI)、未准备壁和牙本质厚度参数。两组数据比较采用Shapiro-Wilk检验和Student t检验,显著性水平为5%。结果:两组在根管体积(127.60% vs 69.22%)和根管远端表面牙本质厚度减少方面差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05), PTG组高于RM组。表面面积(34.79% vs. 26.93%)、SMI和未准备区域百分比(9.43% vs. 12.22%)无显著差异。结论:虽然GTP在远端牙本质厚度和体积上有较大的减少,但两种系统在接触面和未准备区域的百分比上没有差异,证实两种技术都不能完全制备下切牙的长椭圆形管。临床相关性:尽管市场上推出的器械技术进步,由于其冶金特性和短序列而表现出更大的灵活性,但关于FKG Dentaire制造的新型RM器械及其根管建模能力的科学证据很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shaping Ability of the ProTaper Gold and R-Motion Systems in Long-Oval Canals: A Microcomputed Tomography Study.

Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate, by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), the shaping ability and reduction of dentin thickness in mesial and distal surfaces of the ProTaper Gold (PTG; Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and R-Motion (RM; FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) systems in long-oval canals of lower incisors. Materials and Methods: Twenty long-oval lower incisors were selected, compared anatomically, and scanned by micro-CT (SkyScan 1172, Bruker Micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium). The teeth were divided into two groups (n = 10) according to instrumentation technique: PTG and RM. The following morphometric measurements were made on images recorded before and after preparation: volume, surface area, structure model index (SMI), unprepared walls, and dentin thickness parameters were calculated. The Shapiro-Wilk test and Student t-test were used for comparison of the data between the two groups at a significance level of 5%. Results: Significant differences were found in volume (127.60% vs. 69.22%) and reduction in dentin thickness on the distal surface of the root canal, with higher values for PTG compared to RM, respectively (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in surface area (34.79% vs. 26.93%), SMI, and the percentage of unprepared areas (9.43% vs. 12.22%). Conclusion: Although GTP resulted in a greater reduction in dentin thickness on the distal surface and volume, there was no difference in the percentage of contact surface and unprepared areas between the two systems, confirming that neither technique was able to completely prepare the long-oval canals of the lower incisors. Clinical Relevance: Despite the technological advances in instruments launched on the market, exhibiting greater flexibility due to their metallurgical properties and short sequences, there is little scientific evidence regarding the new RM instrument, manufactured by FKG Dentaire, and its root canal modeling capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信