抑郁症患者依恋类型生物心理因素的机器学习预测。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatry Investigation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.30773/pi.2024.0392
Yoon Jae Cho, Jin Sun Ryu, Jeong-Ho Seok, Eunjoo Kim, Jooyoung Oh, Byung-Hoon Kim
{"title":"抑郁症患者依恋类型生物心理因素的机器学习预测。","authors":"Yoon Jae Cho, Jin Sun Ryu, Jeong-Ho Seok, Eunjoo Kim, Jooyoung Oh, Byung-Hoon Kim","doi":"10.30773/pi.2024.0392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adult attachment style is linked to how an individual responds to threats or stress and is known to be related to the onset of psychiatric symptoms such as depression. However, as the current assessment of attachment type mainly relies on self-report questionnaires and can be prone to bias, there is a need to incorporate physiological factors along with psychological symptoms and history in this process. We aimed to predict the measurement of two important types of adult attachment with heart rate variability (HRV), early life stress experience, and subjective psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred eighty-two subjects with depressive disorder were recruited retrospectively from January 2015 to June 2021. The experience of early life stress and psychiatric symptoms were collected, and HRV measures were obtained as input for an ensembled Voting Regressor model of machine learning-based regression models, including linear regression, ElasticNet, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model performances evaluated with R-squared score averaged across 30 seeds were 0.377 and 0.188 for anxious- and avoidant-attachment, respectively. Mean absolute error averaged to 13.251 and 12.083, respectively. Shapley value importance analysis indicated that for both attachment types, the most important feature was the trait-anxiety, followed by emotional abuse, state-anxiety or self-reported depressive symptoms, and fear or helplessness felt in the moment of an early life stressor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results provide the evidence base that may be utilized in clinical settings to predict the degree of attachment type using bio-psychological factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"22 4","pages":"412-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Prediction of Attachment Type From Bio-Psychological Factors in Patients With Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Yoon Jae Cho, Jin Sun Ryu, Jeong-Ho Seok, Eunjoo Kim, Jooyoung Oh, Byung-Hoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.30773/pi.2024.0392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adult attachment style is linked to how an individual responds to threats or stress and is known to be related to the onset of psychiatric symptoms such as depression. However, as the current assessment of attachment type mainly relies on self-report questionnaires and can be prone to bias, there is a need to incorporate physiological factors along with psychological symptoms and history in this process. We aimed to predict the measurement of two important types of adult attachment with heart rate variability (HRV), early life stress experience, and subjective psychiatric symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred eighty-two subjects with depressive disorder were recruited retrospectively from January 2015 to June 2021. The experience of early life stress and psychiatric symptoms were collected, and HRV measures were obtained as input for an ensembled Voting Regressor model of machine learning-based regression models, including linear regression, ElasticNet, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model performances evaluated with R-squared score averaged across 30 seeds were 0.377 and 0.188 for anxious- and avoidant-attachment, respectively. Mean absolute error averaged to 13.251 and 12.083, respectively. Shapley value importance analysis indicated that for both attachment types, the most important feature was the trait-anxiety, followed by emotional abuse, state-anxiety or self-reported depressive symptoms, and fear or helplessness felt in the moment of an early life stressor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results provide the evidence base that may be utilized in clinical settings to predict the degree of attachment type using bio-psychological factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Investigation\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"412-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:成人依恋类型与个体对威胁或压力的反应有关,并且已知与抑郁症等精神症状的发作有关。但由于目前对依恋类型的评估主要依赖于自我报告问卷,容易产生偏差,因此在评估过程中需要将生理因素与心理症状和病史结合起来。我们的目的是预测两种重要类型的成人依恋与心率变异性(HRV)、早期生活压力经历和主观精神症状的测量。方法:从2015年1月至2021年6月回顾性招募582名抑郁症患者。收集早期生活压力和精神症状的经验,并获得HRV测量值作为基于机器学习的回归模型的集成投票回归模型的输入,包括线性回归,ElasticNet,支持向量机(SVM),随机森林和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)。结果:焦虑型依恋和回避型依恋的模型性能在30个种子中的平均r平方得分分别为0.377和0.188。平均绝对误差分别为13.251和12.083。Shapley值重要性分析表明,对于这两种依恋类型,最重要的特征是特质焦虑,其次是情绪虐待,状态焦虑或自我报告的抑郁症状,以及在早期生活压力源时刻感受到的恐惧或无助。结论:本研究结果为临床应用生物心理因素预测依恋类型程度提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Prediction of Attachment Type From Bio-Psychological Factors in Patients With Depression.

Objective: Adult attachment style is linked to how an individual responds to threats or stress and is known to be related to the onset of psychiatric symptoms such as depression. However, as the current assessment of attachment type mainly relies on self-report questionnaires and can be prone to bias, there is a need to incorporate physiological factors along with psychological symptoms and history in this process. We aimed to predict the measurement of two important types of adult attachment with heart rate variability (HRV), early life stress experience, and subjective psychiatric symptoms.

Methods: Five hundred eighty-two subjects with depressive disorder were recruited retrospectively from January 2015 to June 2021. The experience of early life stress and psychiatric symptoms were collected, and HRV measures were obtained as input for an ensembled Voting Regressor model of machine learning-based regression models, including linear regression, ElasticNet, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).

Results: Model performances evaluated with R-squared score averaged across 30 seeds were 0.377 and 0.188 for anxious- and avoidant-attachment, respectively. Mean absolute error averaged to 13.251 and 12.083, respectively. Shapley value importance analysis indicated that for both attachment types, the most important feature was the trait-anxiety, followed by emotional abuse, state-anxiety or self-reported depressive symptoms, and fear or helplessness felt in the moment of an early life stressor.

Conclusion: Our results provide the evidence base that may be utilized in clinical settings to predict the degree of attachment type using bio-psychological factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信