中风后开展高强度有氧运动:一项初步研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-05-03 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13374
Brian Schibler, Michael Spinner, Imama A Naqvi, Joel Stein, Scott Barbuto
{"title":"中风后开展高强度有氧运动:一项初步研究。","authors":"Brian Schibler, Michael Spinner, Imama A Naqvi, Joel Stein, Scott Barbuto","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is a major cause of disability. Exercise is associated with reduced stroke recurrence and improved function. Most interventions have focused on supervised training in clinical settings rather than unsupervised home exercise.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial comparing unsupervised, high-intensity home aerobic training to a waitlist control group in survivors of stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Assessor blinded randomized controlled pilot study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Assessments in medical center, home training.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-three participants who sustained a mild-moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <15) at least 3 months prior were randomized to home aerobic training or waitlist control.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Aerobic training consisted of 8 weeks of stationary bicycle training, five times per week for 30 minutes with heart rate-guided intensity. Control group maintained their normal activities.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Adherence and retention were the primary focus of this evaluation. Secondary outcomes (aerobic capacity VO<sub>2</sub>max, gait, balance, and functional tests) were included for initial efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 participants, only 15 were retained in the study. Dropouts were predominantly in the waitlist control group (3/13 in aerobic group, 5/10 in control group). No serious adverse events occurred. Self-efficacy and adherence to training duration and frequency was high, but only 50% achieved exercise intensity goals. Training benefits were modest with a VO<sub>2</sub>max increase of 1.7 mL/kg/min in the intervention group. The only statistical improvement in outcomes was with box and block testing, likely due to baseline intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Before conducting a larger trial, challenges with home aerobic training in the stroke population must be addressed. Despite high exercise self-efficacy, there was high attrition, particularly in the waitlist control group. Future study design should implement an active control. Benefits were limited, likely due to low training intensity, and efforts should be made to improve quality of unsupervised training, such as providing motivational coaching and wearable exercise trackers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an intensive aerobic exercise program after stroke: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Schibler, Michael Spinner, Imama A Naqvi, Joel Stein, Scott Barbuto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is a major cause of disability. Exercise is associated with reduced stroke recurrence and improved function. Most interventions have focused on supervised training in clinical settings rather than unsupervised home exercise.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial comparing unsupervised, high-intensity home aerobic training to a waitlist control group in survivors of stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Assessor blinded randomized controlled pilot study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Assessments in medical center, home training.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-three participants who sustained a mild-moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <15) at least 3 months prior were randomized to home aerobic training or waitlist control.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Aerobic training consisted of 8 weeks of stationary bicycle training, five times per week for 30 minutes with heart rate-guided intensity. Control group maintained their normal activities.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Adherence and retention were the primary focus of this evaluation. Secondary outcomes (aerobic capacity VO<sub>2</sub>max, gait, balance, and functional tests) were included for initial efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 participants, only 15 were retained in the study. Dropouts were predominantly in the waitlist control group (3/13 in aerobic group, 5/10 in control group). No serious adverse events occurred. Self-efficacy and adherence to training duration and frequency was high, but only 50% achieved exercise intensity goals. Training benefits were modest with a VO<sub>2</sub>max increase of 1.7 mL/kg/min in the intervention group. The only statistical improvement in outcomes was with box and block testing, likely due to baseline intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Before conducting a larger trial, challenges with home aerobic training in the stroke population must be addressed. Despite high exercise self-efficacy, there was high attrition, particularly in the waitlist control group. Future study design should implement an active control. Benefits were limited, likely due to low training intensity, and efforts should be made to improve quality of unsupervised training, such as providing motivational coaching and wearable exercise trackers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13374\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中风是致残的主要原因。运动与减少中风复发和改善功能有关。大多数干预措施侧重于临床环境中的监督训练,而不是无监督的家庭锻炼。目的:确定进行一项随机试验的可行性,比较无监督,高强度的家庭有氧训练和候补对照组的中风幸存者。设计:评估者盲法随机对照试验。环境:医疗中心评估,家庭培训。干预措施:有氧训练包括8周的固定自行车训练,每周五次,每次30分钟,心率指导强度。对照组维持正常活动。结果测量:依从性和保留是本次评估的主要焦点。次要结果(有氧能力VO2max,步态,平衡和功能测试)包括初始疗效。结果:在23名参与者中,只有15人留在了研究中。退选主要发生在候补组(有氧组3/13,对照组5/10)。未发生严重不良事件。自我效能感和对训练时间和频率的依从性很高,但只有50%达到了运动强度目标。干预组的VO2max增加了1.7 mL/kg/min,训练效果不明显。结果的唯一统计改善是方框和块组测试,可能是由于基线组间差异。结论:在进行更大规模的试验之前,必须解决家庭有氧训练在中风人群中的挑战。尽管有很高的运动自我效能感,但也有很高的流失率,特别是在候补名单控制组。未来的研究设计应实施主动控制。效益有限,可能是由于训练强度低,应该努力提高无监督训练的质量,例如提供激励教练和可穿戴运动追踪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing an intensive aerobic exercise program after stroke: A pilot study.

Background: Stroke is a major cause of disability. Exercise is associated with reduced stroke recurrence and improved function. Most interventions have focused on supervised training in clinical settings rather than unsupervised home exercise.

Objective: To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial comparing unsupervised, high-intensity home aerobic training to a waitlist control group in survivors of stroke.

Design: Assessor blinded randomized controlled pilot study.

Setting: Assessments in medical center, home training.

Participants: Twenty-three participants who sustained a mild-moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score <15) at least 3 months prior were randomized to home aerobic training or waitlist control.

Intervention: Aerobic training consisted of 8 weeks of stationary bicycle training, five times per week for 30 minutes with heart rate-guided intensity. Control group maintained their normal activities.

Outcome measures: Adherence and retention were the primary focus of this evaluation. Secondary outcomes (aerobic capacity VO2max, gait, balance, and functional tests) were included for initial efficacy.

Results: Of the 23 participants, only 15 were retained in the study. Dropouts were predominantly in the waitlist control group (3/13 in aerobic group, 5/10 in control group). No serious adverse events occurred. Self-efficacy and adherence to training duration and frequency was high, but only 50% achieved exercise intensity goals. Training benefits were modest with a VO2max increase of 1.7 mL/kg/min in the intervention group. The only statistical improvement in outcomes was with box and block testing, likely due to baseline intergroup differences.

Conclusions: Before conducting a larger trial, challenges with home aerobic training in the stroke population must be addressed. Despite high exercise self-efficacy, there was high attrition, particularly in the waitlist control group. Future study design should implement an active control. Benefits were limited, likely due to low training intensity, and efforts should be made to improve quality of unsupervised training, such as providing motivational coaching and wearable exercise trackers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信