停电:麻醉科住院医师的模拟案例。

Q3 Medicine
Luke Johnson, Ezoza Rajabaliev, Kristin Canipe, Michael R Kazior
{"title":"停电:麻醉科住院医师的模拟案例。","authors":"Luke Johnson, Ezoza Rajabaliev, Kristin Canipe, Michael R Kazior","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Power outages in the OR are rare. However, anesthesia providers must be prepared to manage these situations until power is restored or their patient can be moved to a safe area. These situations occur so infrequently that many learners do not experience these events during their training. We designed a high-fidelity power outage simulation for anesthesiology residents to fill this training gap and enhance their preparedness and confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In each simulation session consisting of up to four learners, one or two PGY 3/PGY 4 residents participated as anesthesiologists in a case involving an intraoperative power loss during a routine inguinal hernia repair of a patient under general anesthesia. After the simulation, residents received a debriefing focused on intraoperative power outage training. After concluding the debriefing, residents completed a 5-point Likert scale survey to assess their confidence in managing an intraoperative power loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 2 years, 22 anesthesiology residents completed the simulation. Residents' mean ratings of confidence in managing a patient in the OR during a power outage improved by 1.2 points (<i>p</i> =.001), confidence in monitoring vital signs improved by 1.4 (<i>p</i> = .001), and confidence in planning appropriate disposition improved by 0.9 (<i>p</i> =.001). All participants found the simulation highly valuable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The anesthesiology-specific simulation proved to be an effective educational tool. Feedback was positive as residents agreed that the simulation was valuable for developing clinical reasoning and decision-making skills, significantly boosting their confidence to respond effectively and maintain patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power Outage: A Simulation Case for Anesthesiology Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Johnson, Ezoza Rajabaliev, Kristin Canipe, Michael R Kazior\",\"doi\":\"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Power outages in the OR are rare. However, anesthesia providers must be prepared to manage these situations until power is restored or their patient can be moved to a safe area. These situations occur so infrequently that many learners do not experience these events during their training. We designed a high-fidelity power outage simulation for anesthesiology residents to fill this training gap and enhance their preparedness and confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In each simulation session consisting of up to four learners, one or two PGY 3/PGY 4 residents participated as anesthesiologists in a case involving an intraoperative power loss during a routine inguinal hernia repair of a patient under general anesthesia. After the simulation, residents received a debriefing focused on intraoperative power outage training. After concluding the debriefing, residents completed a 5-point Likert scale survey to assess their confidence in managing an intraoperative power loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 2 years, 22 anesthesiology residents completed the simulation. Residents' mean ratings of confidence in managing a patient in the OR during a power outage improved by 1.2 points (<i>p</i> =.001), confidence in monitoring vital signs improved by 1.4 (<i>p</i> = .001), and confidence in planning appropriate disposition improved by 0.9 (<i>p</i> =.001). All participants found the simulation highly valuable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The anesthesiology-specific simulation proved to be an effective educational tool. Feedback was positive as residents agreed that the simulation was valuable for developing clinical reasoning and decision-making skills, significantly boosting their confidence to respond effectively and maintain patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"11523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在手术室停电是罕见的。然而,麻醉提供者必须准备好处理这些情况,直到电力恢复或他们的病人可以转移到安全区域。这些情况很少发生,许多学习者在训练中没有经历过这些事件。我们为麻醉科住院医师设计了一个高保真的停电模拟,以填补这一培训空白,增强他们的准备和信心。方法:在每个由最多四名学习者组成的模拟课程中,一名或两名PGY 3/PGY 4住院医师作为麻醉师参与一个病例,该病例涉及患者在全身麻醉下进行常规腹股沟疝修补术中术中功率丢失。在模拟之后,住院医生接受了关于术中停电培训的汇报。汇报结束后,住院医生完成了5分李克特量表调查,以评估他们对处理术中功率损失的信心。结果:在2年多的时间里,22名麻醉科住院医师完成了模拟。住院医生对停电期间在手术室管理病人的信心平均评分提高了1.2分(p = 0.001),对监测生命体征的信心提高了1.4分(p = 0.001),对计划适当处置的信心提高了0.9分(p = 0.001)。所有参与者都认为模拟非常有价值。讨论:麻醉特定模拟被证明是一种有效的教育工具。反馈是积极的,因为住院医生同意模拟对发展临床推理和决策技能很有价值,大大增强了他们有效应对和维护患者安全的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power Outage: A Simulation Case for Anesthesiology Residents.

Introduction: Power outages in the OR are rare. However, anesthesia providers must be prepared to manage these situations until power is restored or their patient can be moved to a safe area. These situations occur so infrequently that many learners do not experience these events during their training. We designed a high-fidelity power outage simulation for anesthesiology residents to fill this training gap and enhance their preparedness and confidence.

Methods: In each simulation session consisting of up to four learners, one or two PGY 3/PGY 4 residents participated as anesthesiologists in a case involving an intraoperative power loss during a routine inguinal hernia repair of a patient under general anesthesia. After the simulation, residents received a debriefing focused on intraoperative power outage training. After concluding the debriefing, residents completed a 5-point Likert scale survey to assess their confidence in managing an intraoperative power loss.

Results: Over 2 years, 22 anesthesiology residents completed the simulation. Residents' mean ratings of confidence in managing a patient in the OR during a power outage improved by 1.2 points (p =.001), confidence in monitoring vital signs improved by 1.4 (p = .001), and confidence in planning appropriate disposition improved by 0.9 (p =.001). All participants found the simulation highly valuable.

Discussion: The anesthesiology-specific simulation proved to be an effective educational tool. Feedback was positive as residents agreed that the simulation was valuable for developing clinical reasoning and decision-making skills, significantly boosting their confidence to respond effectively and maintain patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信