Thamyres M Monteiro, Warley O Silva, Jeferson O Marques, Ana Carolina S P Guerra, Flávio R F Alves
{"title":"细菌在根管制备过程中的根尖挤压:实验室研究的系统综述。","authors":"Thamyres M Monteiro, Warley O Silva, Jeferson O Marques, Ana Carolina S P Guerra, Flávio R F Alves","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Apical extrusion of bacteria is an unintended event that occurs during the chemical-mechanical preparation of infected root canals. Flare-ups and the spread of infection to periradicular tissues are possible consequences. This systematic review aimed to determine which type of engine-driven nickel-titanium systems, reciprocating or rotary, promote greater bacterial extrusion. Studies that compared manual and engine-driven systems or different brands of rotary instruments were also analyzed as a secondary objective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest up to April 2024. Ex vivo studies that quantified the apical extrusion of bacteria comparing different instrumentation systems were included. The studies were critically assessed using a customized checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4938 articles initially retrieved, 38 were selected for full-text reading and 35 were included in this review. Thirteen studies compared rotary and reciprocating instruments, 11 compared manual and engine-driven systems, and 11 compared different rotary instruments. Among the 13 studies comparing rotary and reciprocating systems, 5 reported greater bacterial extrusion with the rotary systems, 5 found no significant differences, and 3 reported mixed results. The available evidence indicates a similar or greater apical extrusion of bacteria with rotary systems compared to reciprocating instruments. Additionally, manual preparation is associated with significantly greater bacterial extrusion than the 2 engine-driven methods. The results varied across studies primarily due to methodological differences, particularly the instrumentation systems employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rotary systems extrude similar or greater quantities of bacteria than reciprocating systems. Conversely, manual instrumentation promotes greater bacterial extrusion than the 2 engine-driven methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apical Extrusion of Bacteria during Canal Preparation: A Systematic Review of Laboratory Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Thamyres M Monteiro, Warley O Silva, Jeferson O Marques, Ana Carolina S P Guerra, Flávio R F Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2025.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Apical extrusion of bacteria is an unintended event that occurs during the chemical-mechanical preparation of infected root canals. Flare-ups and the spread of infection to periradicular tissues are possible consequences. This systematic review aimed to determine which type of engine-driven nickel-titanium systems, reciprocating or rotary, promote greater bacterial extrusion. Studies that compared manual and engine-driven systems or different brands of rotary instruments were also analyzed as a secondary objective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest up to April 2024. Ex vivo studies that quantified the apical extrusion of bacteria comparing different instrumentation systems were included. The studies were critically assessed using a customized checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4938 articles initially retrieved, 38 were selected for full-text reading and 35 were included in this review. Thirteen studies compared rotary and reciprocating instruments, 11 compared manual and engine-driven systems, and 11 compared different rotary instruments. Among the 13 studies comparing rotary and reciprocating systems, 5 reported greater bacterial extrusion with the rotary systems, 5 found no significant differences, and 3 reported mixed results. The available evidence indicates a similar or greater apical extrusion of bacteria with rotary systems compared to reciprocating instruments. Additionally, manual preparation is associated with significantly greater bacterial extrusion than the 2 engine-driven methods. The results varied across studies primarily due to methodological differences, particularly the instrumentation systems employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rotary systems extrude similar or greater quantities of bacteria than reciprocating systems. Conversely, manual instrumentation promotes greater bacterial extrusion than the 2 engine-driven methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.04.009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.04.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
细菌的根尖挤压是在感染根管的化学-机械准备过程中发生的意外事件。急性发作和感染扩散到根周组织是可能的后果。本系统综述旨在确定哪种类型的发动机驱动的镍钛系统,往复式或旋转式,促进更大的细菌挤压。比较手动和发动机驱动系统或不同品牌的旋转仪器的研究也作为次要目标进行了分析。方法:截至2024年4月在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和ProQuest中进行检索。体外研究量化了比较不同仪器系统的细菌顶端挤压。使用定制的检查表对研究进行了严格评估。结果:在最初检索到的4938篇文章中,38篇被选择为全文阅读,35篇被纳入本综述。13项研究比较了旋转和往复式仪器,11项研究比较了手动和发动机驱动系统,11项研究比较了不同的旋转仪器。在比较旋转式和往复式系统的13项研究中,有5项报告旋转式系统的细菌挤压更大,5项没有发现显著差异,3项报告的结果好坏参半。现有证据表明,与往复式仪器相比,旋转系统有类似或更大的细菌顶端挤压。此外,与2种发动机驱动的方法相比,人工制备与更大的细菌挤压相关。不同研究的结果不同,主要是由于方法上的差异,特别是所使用的仪器系统。结论:旋转式系统比往复式系统挤出相似或更多数量的细菌。相反,与两种发动机驱动的方法相比,手动仪表促进了更大的细菌挤压。
Apical Extrusion of Bacteria during Canal Preparation: A Systematic Review of Laboratory Studies.
Introduction: Apical extrusion of bacteria is an unintended event that occurs during the chemical-mechanical preparation of infected root canals. Flare-ups and the spread of infection to periradicular tissues are possible consequences. This systematic review aimed to determine which type of engine-driven nickel-titanium systems, reciprocating or rotary, promote greater bacterial extrusion. Studies that compared manual and engine-driven systems or different brands of rotary instruments were also analyzed as a secondary objective.
Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest up to April 2024. Ex vivo studies that quantified the apical extrusion of bacteria comparing different instrumentation systems were included. The studies were critically assessed using a customized checklist.
Results: Of the 4938 articles initially retrieved, 38 were selected for full-text reading and 35 were included in this review. Thirteen studies compared rotary and reciprocating instruments, 11 compared manual and engine-driven systems, and 11 compared different rotary instruments. Among the 13 studies comparing rotary and reciprocating systems, 5 reported greater bacterial extrusion with the rotary systems, 5 found no significant differences, and 3 reported mixed results. The available evidence indicates a similar or greater apical extrusion of bacteria with rotary systems compared to reciprocating instruments. Additionally, manual preparation is associated with significantly greater bacterial extrusion than the 2 engine-driven methods. The results varied across studies primarily due to methodological differences, particularly the instrumentation systems employed.
Conclusion: Rotary systems extrude similar or greater quantities of bacteria than reciprocating systems. Conversely, manual instrumentation promotes greater bacterial extrusion than the 2 engine-driven methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.