危重患者持续脑电图开始时间与预后的关系。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muhammad A Haider, Mohammad H Khalil, Marta B Fernandes, Michael B Westover, Sahar F Zafar
{"title":"危重患者持续脑电图开始时间与预后的关系。","authors":"Muhammad A Haider, Mohammad H Khalil, Marta B Fernandes, Michael B Westover, Sahar F Zafar","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is used in the critical care setting for seizure detection and treatment, sedation management, and ischemia detection. Further evidence is needed to support whether early cEEG use can improve outcomes. We examined whether time from admission to cEEG initiation affects outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center cohort study of critically ill adults (age > 18 years) who underwent cEEG monitoring within 7 days of admission from January to December 2019. Patients with anoxic brain injury were excluded. Time (hours) from admission to cEEG was recorded. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and poor discharge modified Rankin Score (4-6). Results are reported as median [quartile range] and odds ratio (OR) [confidence intervals, CI].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 464 patients met eligibility. Median time to cEEG was 23 hours [13, 52]. On multivariable analysis, increasing time to cEEG was associated with discharge mortality (OR, 1.006 [CI, 1.0002-1.013], 0.1%/hour [CI, 0.02-0.2]) and poor outcome (OR, 1.013 [CI, 1.005-1.020], 0.2%/hour [CI, 0.07-0.3]). Median time to cEEG initiation in patients with clinical concern for seizures/status at presentation (n = 121) was 12 hours [6, 17] and in patients without clinical concern for seizures at presentation (n = 343) was 31 hours [18, 66]. In patients without clinical concern for seizures/status epilepticus at presentation, time to cEEG continued to be associated with mortality (OR, 1.007 [CI, 1.001-1.014)] and poor outcome (OR, 1.012 [CI, 1.003-1.021]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing time to cEEG initiation was associated with higher mortality and worse outcomes. We hypothesize earlier cEEG results in timely interventions including treatment escalation and de-escalation that may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Time to Continuous EEG Initiation With Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad A Haider, Mohammad H Khalil, Marta B Fernandes, Michael B Westover, Sahar F Zafar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is used in the critical care setting for seizure detection and treatment, sedation management, and ischemia detection. Further evidence is needed to support whether early cEEG use can improve outcomes. We examined whether time from admission to cEEG initiation affects outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center cohort study of critically ill adults (age > 18 years) who underwent cEEG monitoring within 7 days of admission from January to December 2019. Patients with anoxic brain injury were excluded. Time (hours) from admission to cEEG was recorded. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and poor discharge modified Rankin Score (4-6). Results are reported as median [quartile range] and odds ratio (OR) [confidence intervals, CI].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 464 patients met eligibility. Median time to cEEG was 23 hours [13, 52]. On multivariable analysis, increasing time to cEEG was associated with discharge mortality (OR, 1.006 [CI, 1.0002-1.013], 0.1%/hour [CI, 0.02-0.2]) and poor outcome (OR, 1.013 [CI, 1.005-1.020], 0.2%/hour [CI, 0.07-0.3]). Median time to cEEG initiation in patients with clinical concern for seizures/status at presentation (n = 121) was 12 hours [6, 17] and in patients without clinical concern for seizures at presentation (n = 343) was 31 hours [18, 66]. In patients without clinical concern for seizures/status epilepticus at presentation, time to cEEG continued to be associated with mortality (OR, 1.007 [CI, 1.001-1.014)] and poor outcome (OR, 1.012 [CI, 1.003-1.021]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing time to cEEG initiation was associated with higher mortality and worse outcomes. We hypothesize earlier cEEG results in timely interventions including treatment escalation and de-escalation that may improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:连续脑电图(cEEG)在重症监护环境中用于癫痫发作的检测和治疗、镇静管理和缺血检测。需要进一步的证据来支持早期使用脑电图是否可以改善预后。我们研究了从入院到脑电图开始的时间是否会影响结果。方法:本研究是一项单中心队列研究,研究对象为2019年1月至12月入院7天内接受脑电图监测的危重成人(年龄0 ~ 18岁)。排除无氧脑损伤患者。记录入院至脑电图的时间(小时)。结果是住院死亡率和出院不良修正Rankin评分(4-6)。结果报告为中位数[四分位数范围]和优势比(OR)[置信区间,CI]。结果:共有464例患者符合入选条件。到脑电图的中位时间为23小时[13,52]。在多变量分析中,增加到cEEG的时间与出院死亡率(OR, 1.006 [CI, 1.0002-1.013], 0.1%/小时[CI, 0.02-0.2])和预后不良(OR, 1.013 [CI, 1.005-1.020], 0.2%/小时[CI, 0.07-0.3])相关。在有癫痫发作/发病状态临床担忧的患者(n = 121)中,到脑电图启动的中位时间为12小时[6,17],而在无癫痫发作临床担忧的患者(n = 343)中,起始时间为31小时[18,66]。在没有癫痫发作/癫痫持续状态临床症状的患者中,到脑电图的时间继续与死亡率(OR, 1.007 [CI, 1.001-1.014)]和不良预后(OR, 1.012 [CI, 1.003-1.021])相关。结论:延长脑电图起始时间与更高的死亡率和更差的预后相关。我们假设早期脑电图结果及时干预,包括治疗升级和降级,可能改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Time to Continuous EEG Initiation With Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients.

Purpose: Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is used in the critical care setting for seizure detection and treatment, sedation management, and ischemia detection. Further evidence is needed to support whether early cEEG use can improve outcomes. We examined whether time from admission to cEEG initiation affects outcomes.

Methods: This is a single-center cohort study of critically ill adults (age > 18 years) who underwent cEEG monitoring within 7 days of admission from January to December 2019. Patients with anoxic brain injury were excluded. Time (hours) from admission to cEEG was recorded. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and poor discharge modified Rankin Score (4-6). Results are reported as median [quartile range] and odds ratio (OR) [confidence intervals, CI].

Results: In total, 464 patients met eligibility. Median time to cEEG was 23 hours [13, 52]. On multivariable analysis, increasing time to cEEG was associated with discharge mortality (OR, 1.006 [CI, 1.0002-1.013], 0.1%/hour [CI, 0.02-0.2]) and poor outcome (OR, 1.013 [CI, 1.005-1.020], 0.2%/hour [CI, 0.07-0.3]). Median time to cEEG initiation in patients with clinical concern for seizures/status at presentation (n = 121) was 12 hours [6, 17] and in patients without clinical concern for seizures at presentation (n = 343) was 31 hours [18, 66]. In patients without clinical concern for seizures/status epilepticus at presentation, time to cEEG continued to be associated with mortality (OR, 1.007 [CI, 1.001-1.014)] and poor outcome (OR, 1.012 [CI, 1.003-1.021]).

Conclusions: Increasing time to cEEG initiation was associated with higher mortality and worse outcomes. We hypothesize earlier cEEG results in timely interventions including treatment escalation and de-escalation that may improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信