{"title":"患者指导深吸气屏气可减少左侧乳腺癌放疗的设置时间和左前降支剂量。","authors":"Aysegul Ucuncu Kefeli, Umut Diremsizoglu, Sevda Erdogan, Aysegul Unal Karabey, Aykut Oguz Konuk, Berna Tirpanci, Maksut Gorkem Aksu, Emine Binnaz Sarper","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09446-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to show the impact of patient coaching and home practice using the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique on radiation treatment set-up times and cardiac at-risk doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved patients who received tangential field radiotherapy using the DIBH technique for treating left breast cancer. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of those who received coaching from an oncology nurse and were given an instruction sheet at least 1 week before the computed tomography (CT) simulation. The second group consisted of those who were only taught how to hold their breath by the radiation technician on the simulation day and without further education. During treatment, the patients were monitored using the Varian RPM™ respiratory gating system, and 2D kV orthogonal imaging was performed daily. The setup duration of each patient was noted and compared between treatment groups. For each patient, the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the heart, LAD (left anterior descending artery), were calculated and compared for both coached DIBH (cDIBH) and non-coached DIBH (ncDIBH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six coached and 28 non-coached patients were identified. Compared with ncDIBH, coached patients were older (55.5 versus 46.5, p = 0.003) and had a significantly higher BMI (body mass index) (29.95 versus 26.32 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.006). Nevertheless, in more than half of the treatment fractions, the set-up duration was detected to be statistically longer in the ncDIBH group than in the cDIBH group. Additionally, the LAD max dose was significantly lower in the cDIBH group (36.5 versus 29.5, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coaching at least 1 week before the simulation with an instruction sheet decreased the set-up duration, and the cardiac LAD max dose should be further decreased by this method.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 5","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient coaching for deep inspiration breath hold decreases set-up duration and left anterior descending artery dose for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Aysegul Ucuncu Kefeli, Umut Diremsizoglu, Sevda Erdogan, Aysegul Unal Karabey, Aykut Oguz Konuk, Berna Tirpanci, Maksut Gorkem Aksu, Emine Binnaz Sarper\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09446-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to show the impact of patient coaching and home practice using the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique on radiation treatment set-up times and cardiac at-risk doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved patients who received tangential field radiotherapy using the DIBH technique for treating left breast cancer. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of those who received coaching from an oncology nurse and were given an instruction sheet at least 1 week before the computed tomography (CT) simulation. The second group consisted of those who were only taught how to hold their breath by the radiation technician on the simulation day and without further education. During treatment, the patients were monitored using the Varian RPM™ respiratory gating system, and 2D kV orthogonal imaging was performed daily. The setup duration of each patient was noted and compared between treatment groups. For each patient, the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the heart, LAD (left anterior descending artery), were calculated and compared for both coached DIBH (cDIBH) and non-coached DIBH (ncDIBH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six coached and 28 non-coached patients were identified. Compared with ncDIBH, coached patients were older (55.5 versus 46.5, p = 0.003) and had a significantly higher BMI (body mass index) (29.95 versus 26.32 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.006). Nevertheless, in more than half of the treatment fractions, the set-up duration was detected to be statistically longer in the ncDIBH group than in the cDIBH group. Additionally, the LAD max dose was significantly lower in the cDIBH group (36.5 versus 29.5, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coaching at least 1 week before the simulation with an instruction sheet decreased the set-up duration, and the cardiac LAD max dose should be further decreased by this method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09446-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09446-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:目的是显示患者指导和使用深度吸气屏气(DIBH)技术的家庭实践对放射治疗准备时间和心脏危险剂量的影响。方法:研究对象为采用DIBH技术行切向野放疗治疗左乳腺癌的患者。患者被分为两组:第一组接受肿瘤护士的指导,并在计算机断层扫描(CT)模拟前至少1周给予说明书。第二组是那些只在模拟日由辐射技术员教如何屏住呼吸的人,没有接受进一步的教育。在治疗期间,患者使用Varian RPM™呼吸门控系统进行监测,每天进行2D kV正交成像。记录每位患者的设置时间,并在治疗组之间进行比较。对于每位患者,计算并比较训练DIBH (cDIBH)和非训练DIBH (ncDIBH)患者心脏左前降支(LAD)的剂量-体积直方图(DVHs)。结果:经训练的患者36例,未经训练的患者28例。与ncDIBH相比,教练组患者年龄更大(55.5比46.5,p = 0.003), BMI(身体质量指数)明显更高(29.95比26.32 kg/m2, p = 0.006)。然而,在超过一半的治疗分数中,ncDIBH组的设置时间在统计学上比cDIBH组更长。此外,cDIBH组LAD最大剂量显著降低(36.5 vs 29.5, p = 0.02)。结论:在模拟前至少1周用说明书进行训练,可以缩短设置时间,心脏LAD最大剂量应进一步降低。
Patient coaching for deep inspiration breath hold decreases set-up duration and left anterior descending artery dose for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.
Purpose: The purpose is to show the impact of patient coaching and home practice using the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique on radiation treatment set-up times and cardiac at-risk doses.
Methods: The study involved patients who received tangential field radiotherapy using the DIBH technique for treating left breast cancer. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of those who received coaching from an oncology nurse and were given an instruction sheet at least 1 week before the computed tomography (CT) simulation. The second group consisted of those who were only taught how to hold their breath by the radiation technician on the simulation day and without further education. During treatment, the patients were monitored using the Varian RPM™ respiratory gating system, and 2D kV orthogonal imaging was performed daily. The setup duration of each patient was noted and compared between treatment groups. For each patient, the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the heart, LAD (left anterior descending artery), were calculated and compared for both coached DIBH (cDIBH) and non-coached DIBH (ncDIBH).
Results: Thirty-six coached and 28 non-coached patients were identified. Compared with ncDIBH, coached patients were older (55.5 versus 46.5, p = 0.003) and had a significantly higher BMI (body mass index) (29.95 versus 26.32 kg/m2, p = 0.006). Nevertheless, in more than half of the treatment fractions, the set-up duration was detected to be statistically longer in the ncDIBH group than in the cDIBH group. Additionally, the LAD max dose was significantly lower in the cDIBH group (36.5 versus 29.5, p = 0.02).
Conclusion: Coaching at least 1 week before the simulation with an instruction sheet decreased the set-up duration, and the cardiac LAD max dose should be further decreased by this method.
期刊介绍:
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.