自结扎与传统结扎支架系统的白斑病变:系统回顾。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1177/03000605251328608
Mohammad I Idris, Ahmad S Burhan, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Ahmad M Alhamwi, Fehmie R Nawaya
{"title":"自结扎与传统结扎支架系统的白斑病变:系统回顾。","authors":"Mohammad I Idris, Ahmad S Burhan, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Ahmad M Alhamwi, Fehmie R Nawaya","doi":"10.1177/03000605251328608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhite spot lesion formation around orthodontic brackets is a major complication associated with fixed orthodontic treatment.ObjectiveThis review aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating brackets.MethodsEleven bibliographic databases were searched until January 2025. This review covered parallel-group and split-mouth randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and cross-sectional studies that investigated the differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating brackets.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials, one controlled clinical trial, and one cross-sectional study were included in this systematic review. Among these, three studies were classified as having a low risk of bias. Four of the five included studies showed no statistically significant difference in white spot lesion formation between the two types of bracket systems (p < 0.05).ConclusionThere are no potential differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating bracket systems. However, orthodontists must be aware of the other factors affecting white spot lesion formation, with oral hygiene being the most critical factor.<b>Registration:</b> The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022353478) on 25 August 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 4","pages":"3000605251328608"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"White spot lesion in self-ligating versus conventional ligating bracket systems: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad I Idris, Ahmad S Burhan, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Ahmad M Alhamwi, Fehmie R Nawaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605251328608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundWhite spot lesion formation around orthodontic brackets is a major complication associated with fixed orthodontic treatment.ObjectiveThis review aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating brackets.MethodsEleven bibliographic databases were searched until January 2025. This review covered parallel-group and split-mouth randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and cross-sectional studies that investigated the differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating brackets.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials, one controlled clinical trial, and one cross-sectional study were included in this systematic review. Among these, three studies were classified as having a low risk of bias. Four of the five included studies showed no statistically significant difference in white spot lesion formation between the two types of bracket systems (p < 0.05).ConclusionThere are no potential differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating bracket systems. However, orthodontists must be aware of the other factors affecting white spot lesion formation, with oral hygiene being the most critical factor.<b>Registration:</b> The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022353478) on 25 August 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"3000605251328608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251328608\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251328608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:正畸托槽周围形成白斑病变是固定正畸治疗的主要并发症。目的评价自结扎支架与传统结扎支架在白斑病变形成方面的差异。方法检索截至2025年1月的5个文献数据库。本综述涵盖了平行组和裂口随机对照试验、对照临床试验和横断面研究,这些研究调查了自结扎和传统结扎支架在白斑病变形成方面的差异。结果本系统综述纳入3项随机对照试验、1项临床对照试验和1项横断面研究。其中,有三项研究被归类为低偏倚风险。5项纳入的研究中有4项显示两种支架系统在白斑病变形成方面没有统计学上的显著差异(p注册:该方案于2022年8月25日在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42022353478)中注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
White spot lesion in self-ligating versus conventional ligating bracket systems: A systematic review.

BackgroundWhite spot lesion formation around orthodontic brackets is a major complication associated with fixed orthodontic treatment.ObjectiveThis review aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating brackets.MethodsEleven bibliographic databases were searched until January 2025. This review covered parallel-group and split-mouth randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and cross-sectional studies that investigated the differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating brackets.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials, one controlled clinical trial, and one cross-sectional study were included in this systematic review. Among these, three studies were classified as having a low risk of bias. Four of the five included studies showed no statistically significant difference in white spot lesion formation between the two types of bracket systems (p < 0.05).ConclusionThere are no potential differences in white spot lesion formation between self-ligating and conventional ligating bracket systems. However, orthodontists must be aware of the other factors affecting white spot lesion formation, with oral hygiene being the most critical factor.Registration: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022353478) on 25 August 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信