dalbavancin在意大利SUSANA队列中的临床应用(新抗生素的安全性和结局监测)。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Sara Tordi, Elena Ricci, Luca Mezzadri, Stefania Piconi, Stefania Cicalini, Giovanni Cenderello, Goffredo Angioni, Letizia Attala, Paolo Maggi, Giordano Madeddu, Luca Bisi, Alessandro Pandolfo, Daniela Francisci, Francesco Luzzaro, Paolo Bonfanti, Giuseppe V De Socio
{"title":"dalbavancin在意大利SUSANA队列中的临床应用(新抗生素的安全性和结局监测)。","authors":"Sara Tordi, Elena Ricci, Luca Mezzadri, Stefania Piconi, Stefania Cicalini, Giovanni Cenderello, Goffredo Angioni, Letizia Attala, Paolo Maggi, Giordano Madeddu, Luca Bisi, Alessandro Pandolfo, Daniela Francisci, Francesco Luzzaro, Paolo Bonfanti, Giuseppe V De Socio","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic success and adverse events (AEs) of dalbavancin on-label and off-label use in clinical practice. This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre study that enrolled consecutive patients treated with dalbavancin from January 2017 to May 2024 in the Italian SUSANA cohort. Therapeutic success was defined as clinical cure or infection control if chronic suppressive therapy was performed. Risk factors for treatment failure were evaluated using a logistic regression model. A total of 281 patients were enrolled in the study. On-label administration occurred in 162 (57.6%) cases and off-label in 119 (42.6%). The main off-label prescriptions included 29 cases of osteomyelitis and 25 cases of prosthetic joint infections. Dalbavancin was used mainly as empirical therapy (70.4% of cases) in the on-label group, while in the off-label group as targeted therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (29.4%). The therapeutic success rate was similar in both groups (82.7% on-label versus 84.0% off-label). Only one adverse event caused discontinuation of treatment in the on-label group. In addition, one grade-3 AE was observed in each cohort, without treatment interruption. Dalbavancin was widely used in clinical practice for on-label and off-label indications with a comparable success rate of 82.8% and 84.0%, respectively, and a good safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"48 1","pages":"35-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical use of dalbavancin in the Italian SUSANA cohort (SUrveillance of SAfety and outcome of New Antibiotics).\",\"authors\":\"Sara Tordi, Elena Ricci, Luca Mezzadri, Stefania Piconi, Stefania Cicalini, Giovanni Cenderello, Goffredo Angioni, Letizia Attala, Paolo Maggi, Giordano Madeddu, Luca Bisi, Alessandro Pandolfo, Daniela Francisci, Francesco Luzzaro, Paolo Bonfanti, Giuseppe V De Socio\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic success and adverse events (AEs) of dalbavancin on-label and off-label use in clinical practice. This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre study that enrolled consecutive patients treated with dalbavancin from January 2017 to May 2024 in the Italian SUSANA cohort. Therapeutic success was defined as clinical cure or infection control if chronic suppressive therapy was performed. Risk factors for treatment failure were evaluated using a logistic regression model. A total of 281 patients were enrolled in the study. On-label administration occurred in 162 (57.6%) cases and off-label in 119 (42.6%). The main off-label prescriptions included 29 cases of osteomyelitis and 25 cases of prosthetic joint infections. Dalbavancin was used mainly as empirical therapy (70.4% of cases) in the on-label group, while in the off-label group as targeted therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (29.4%). The therapeutic success rate was similar in both groups (82.7% on-label versus 84.0% off-label). Only one adverse event caused discontinuation of treatment in the on-label group. In addition, one grade-3 AE was observed in each cohort, without treatment interruption. Dalbavancin was widely used in clinical practice for on-label and off-label indications with a comparable success rate of 82.8% and 84.0%, respectively, and a good safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"35-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的目的是评估达尔巴文星在临床实践中的治疗成功和不良事件(ae)。这是一项回顾性、观察性、多中心研究,纳入了2017年1月至2024年5月在意大利SUSANA队列中连续接受达尔巴伐辛治疗的患者。治疗成功定义为临床治愈或感染控制,如果进行慢性抑制治疗。采用logistic回归模型评估治疗失败的危险因素。共有281名患者参加了这项研究。按说明书用药162例(57.6%),超说明书用药119例(42.6%)。主要超说明书处方包括29例骨髓炎和25例假体关节感染。在标签组中,Dalbavancin主要作为经验性治疗(70.4%),而在标签外组中,Dalbavancin作为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的靶向治疗(29.4%)。两组的治疗成功率相似(标签上的82.7%对标签外的84.0%)。在标签组中只有一个不良事件导致停止治疗。此外,每个队列中均观察到1例3级AE,未中断治疗。Dalbavancin在临床实践中广泛用于说明书内适应症和说明书外适应症,成功率分别为82.8%和84.0%,并且具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical use of dalbavancin in the Italian SUSANA cohort (SUrveillance of SAfety and outcome of New Antibiotics).

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic success and adverse events (AEs) of dalbavancin on-label and off-label use in clinical practice. This was a retrospective, observational, multicentre study that enrolled consecutive patients treated with dalbavancin from January 2017 to May 2024 in the Italian SUSANA cohort. Therapeutic success was defined as clinical cure or infection control if chronic suppressive therapy was performed. Risk factors for treatment failure were evaluated using a logistic regression model. A total of 281 patients were enrolled in the study. On-label administration occurred in 162 (57.6%) cases and off-label in 119 (42.6%). The main off-label prescriptions included 29 cases of osteomyelitis and 25 cases of prosthetic joint infections. Dalbavancin was used mainly as empirical therapy (70.4% of cases) in the on-label group, while in the off-label group as targeted therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (29.4%). The therapeutic success rate was similar in both groups (82.7% on-label versus 84.0% off-label). Only one adverse event caused discontinuation of treatment in the on-label group. In addition, one grade-3 AE was observed in each cohort, without treatment interruption. Dalbavancin was widely used in clinical practice for on-label and off-label indications with a comparable success rate of 82.8% and 84.0%, respectively, and a good safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbiologica
New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信