艾滋病毒护理中的系统性不平等、尊严和信任:定性分析。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amanda L Sanchez, Chynna Mills, DeAuj'Zhane Coley, Katelin Hoskins, Florence Momplaisir, Robert Gross, Kathleen A Brady, Rinad S Beidas
{"title":"艾滋病毒护理中的系统性不平等、尊严和信任:定性分析。","authors":"Amanda L Sanchez, Chynna Mills, DeAuj'Zhane Coley, Katelin Hoskins, Florence Momplaisir, Robert Gross, Kathleen A Brady, Rinad S Beidas","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda L Sanchez, Chynna Mills, DeAuj'Zhane Coley, Katelin Hoskins, Florence Momplaisir, Robert Gross, Kathleen A Brady, Rinad S Beidas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057254/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02481-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

坚持和坚持治疗是艾滋病毒感染者取得良好健康结果的关键目标。对于面临交叉结构压迫的边缘化社区来说,坚持和保留的挑战是显而易见的。社区卫生工作者提供有管理的问题解决方案(MAPS+),这是一种基于证据的行为干预,有可能提高依从性和保留性,但了解影响艾滋病毒感染者的结构性不平等对于增加公平实施的可能性是必要的。目前的研究探讨了影响艾滋病毒护理依从性和保留的系统性不平等,以及解决这些挑战的方法。我们对13家诊所和4个组成组进行了半结构化访谈:开处方的临床医生、非开处方的临床团队成员(例如,医疗病例管理人员)、诊所管理人员和政策制定者。通过在建构主义范式下的反身性主题分析,我们确定了两个关键主题。第一项研究阐明了与MAPS+相关的系统性不平等经验,如获取资源、卫生保健系统导航困难、权力差异、医疗不信任、交叉污名和潜在患者负担。第二个主题强调了工作人员和临床医生如何通过有尊严地接近艾滋病毒感染者和发展信任关系来承担解决不平等问题的责任,以及MAPS +如何通过与患者合作并以患者需求为中心来加强这一方法。虽然这些个人和组织的努力是有价值的,但制止艾滋病毒流行需要进行结构性改革,以直接解决系统性不平等问题。这项研究强调了结构性压迫与艾滋病毒护理之间复杂的相互作用,呼吁采取综合方法实现卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic inequities, dignity, and trust in the context of HIV care: a qualitative analysis.

Adherence and retention in care are key targets to achieve favorable health outcomes for people with HIV. Challenges with adherence and retention are pronounced for marginalized communities facing intersectional structural oppression. Community health worker delivery of Managed Problem Solving (MAPS+), an evidence-based behavioral intervention, has the potential to improve adherence and retention, yet understanding structural inequities affecting people with HIV is necessary to increase the likelihood of equitable implementation. The current study explores systemic inequities influencing HIV care adherence and retention, and approaches to address these challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 clinics and 4 constituent groups: prescribing clinicians, non-prescribing clinical team members (e.g., medical case managers), clinic administrators, and policymakers. Through reflexive thematic analysis within a constructionist paradigm, we identified two key themes. The first elucidated experiences of systemic inequities such as access to resources, healthcare system navigation difficulties, power differentials, medical mistrust, intersectional stigma and potential patient burden associated with MAPS+. The second theme highlighted the ways in which staff and clinicians shoulder the burden of addressing inequities by approaching people with HIV with dignity and developing trusting relationships and how MAPS + can bolster this approach by partnering with and centering patient needs. While these individual and organizational efforts are valuable, ending the HIV epidemic requires structural changes to address systemic inequities directly. This research underscores the complex interplay between structural oppression and HIV care, calling for comprehensive approaches to achieve health equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信