{"title":"从简单的哔哔声到复杂的声音:定制设计的声音提高了穿梭测试的性能和感知乐趣。","authors":"Sascha Ketelhut, Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (<i>p</i> = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (<i>p</i> = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (<i>p</i> = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (<i>p</i> = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (<i>p</i> < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (<i>p</i> = .002) and C than A (<i>p</i> = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1462-1470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment.\",\"authors\":\"Sascha Ketelhut, Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (<i>p</i> = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (<i>p</i> = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (<i>p</i> = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (<i>p</i> = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (<i>p</i> < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (<i>p</i> = .002) and C than A (<i>p</i> = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1462-1470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment.
This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (p = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (p = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (p = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (p = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (p = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (p = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (p < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (p = .002) and C than A (p = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.