从简单的哔哔声到复杂的声音:定制设计的声音提高了穿梭测试的性能和感知乐趣。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898
Sascha Ketelhut, Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug
{"title":"从简单的哔哔声到复杂的声音:定制设计的声音提高了穿梭测试的性能和感知乐趣。","authors":"Sascha Ketelhut, Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (<i>p</i> = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (<i>p</i> = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (<i>p</i> = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (<i>p</i> = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (<i>p</i> < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (<i>p</i> = .002) and C than A (<i>p</i> = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1462-1470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment.\",\"authors\":\"Sascha Ketelhut, Valentin Benzing, Daniel Hug\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (<i>p</i> = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (<i>p</i> = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (<i>p</i> = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (<i>p</i> = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (<i>p</i> = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (<i>p</i> < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (<i>p</i> = .002) and C than A (<i>p</i> = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1462-1470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2502898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了与传统的蜂鸣声相比,定制设计的声音是否能提高参与者在20米穿梭测试(SRT)中的表现和情感反应。23名受试者(24.8±4.5岁)在不同的测试日按随机、平衡顺序完成了三个srt。在srt中,参与者被传统的哔哔声(刺激A)或两种不同的定制声音(刺激B和C)引导。在srt之间比较总覆盖距离、最高心率、感知运动、注意力集中和享受。观察到SRT期间覆盖的总距离有显著的主效应(p = 0.004),与刺激A相比,刺激B期间覆盖的距离更大(p = 0.001)。发现主要影响是峰值心率(p = 0.012),刺激B的心率高于刺激A (p = 0.032)。感知劳累程度评分无显著影响(p = .665)。对于注意焦点,出现了条件的主要影响(p = 0.023),刺激之间没有显著差异。感知享受表现为主要作用(p p = 0.002), C比a (p = 0.010)。定制设计的声音提高了表现、努力投入和享受,潜在地提高了SRT的效度和对运动测试的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From simple beeps to complex sounds: Custom-designed sounds improve shuttle run test performance and perceived enjoyment.

This study evaluated whether custom-designed sounds enhance participants' performance and improve affective responses during the 20-meter shuttle run test (SRT) when compared to the traditional beep sound. Twenty-three individuals (24.8 ± 4.5 years) completed three SRTs on separate test days in a randomised, counterbalanced order. During the SRTs, participants were guided either by the traditional beep sound (stimulus A) or by two different customised sounds (stimuli B, and C). The total distance covered, peak heart rate, perceived exertion, attentional focus, and enjoyment were compared between the SRTs. A significant main effect was observed for the total distance covered during the SRT (p = .004), with greater distances covered during stimulus B compared to stimulus A (p = .001). A main effect was found for peak heart rate (p = .012), with higher heart rates observed for stimulus B than for stimulus A (p = .032). No significant effect was found for rating of perceived exertion (p = .665). For attentional focus, a main effect of condition emerged (p = .023) without significant differences between stimuli. Perceived enjoyment showed a main effect (p < .001), with greater enjoyment for stimulus B than A (p = .002) and C than A (p = .010). Custom-designed sounds enhanced performance, effort investment, and enjoyment, potentially improving SRT validity and perceptions of exercise testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信