深度学习重建在屏气MRCP中提高分辨率和图像质量的初步研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kaori Shiraishi, Takeshi Nakaura, Naofumi Yoshida, Kensei Matsuo, Naoki Kobayashi, Masamichi Hokamura, Hiroyuki Uetani, Yasunori Nagayama, Masafumi Kidoh, Kosuke Morita, Yuichi Yamashita, Yasuhito Tanaka, Hideo Baba, Toshinori Hirai
{"title":"深度学习重建在屏气MRCP中提高分辨率和图像质量的初步研究。","authors":"Kaori Shiraishi, Takeshi Nakaura, Naofumi Yoshida, Kensei Matsuo, Naoki Kobayashi, Masamichi Hokamura, Hiroyuki Uetani, Yasunori Nagayama, Masafumi Kidoh, Kosuke Morita, Yuichi Yamashita, Yasuhito Tanaka, Hideo Baba, Toshinori Hirai","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This preliminary study aims to assess the image quality of enhanced-resolution deep learning reconstruction (ER-DLR) in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and compare it with non-ER-DLR MRCP images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective study incorporated 34 patients diagnosed with biliary and pancreatic disorders. We obtained MRCP images using a single breath-hold MRCP on a 3T MRI system. We reconstructed MRCP images with ER-DLR (matrix = 768 × 960) and without ER-DLR (matrix = 256 × 320). Quantitative evaluation involved measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct and periductal tissues, and slope. Two radiologists independently scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality for the 2 image types using a 4-point scale. Results are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and we compared quantitative and qualitative scores employing the Wilcoxon test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In quantitative analyses, ER-DLR significantly improved SNR (21.08 [IQR: 14.85, 31.5] vs 15.07 [IQR: 9.57, 25.23], P  < 0.001), CNR (19.29 [IQR: 13.87, 24.98] vs 11.23 [IQR: 8.98, 15.74], P  < 0.001), contrast (0.96 [IQR: 0.94, 0.97] vs 0.9 [IQR: 0.87, 0.92], P  < 0.001), and slope of MRCP (0.62 [IQR: 0.56, 0.66] vs 0.49 [IQR: 0.45, 0.53], P  < 0.001). The qualitative evaluation demonstrated significant improvements in the perceived noise ( P  < 0.001), contrast ( P  = 0.013), sharpness ( P  < 0.001), and overall image quality ( P  < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ER-DLR markedly increased the resolution, SNR, and CNR of breath-hold-MRCP compared to cases without ER-DLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":"49 3","pages":"367-376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Reconstruction for Enhanced Resolution and Image Quality in Breath-Hold MRCP: A Preliminary Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kaori Shiraishi, Takeshi Nakaura, Naofumi Yoshida, Kensei Matsuo, Naoki Kobayashi, Masamichi Hokamura, Hiroyuki Uetani, Yasunori Nagayama, Masafumi Kidoh, Kosuke Morita, Yuichi Yamashita, Yasuhito Tanaka, Hideo Baba, Toshinori Hirai\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This preliminary study aims to assess the image quality of enhanced-resolution deep learning reconstruction (ER-DLR) in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and compare it with non-ER-DLR MRCP images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective study incorporated 34 patients diagnosed with biliary and pancreatic disorders. We obtained MRCP images using a single breath-hold MRCP on a 3T MRI system. We reconstructed MRCP images with ER-DLR (matrix = 768 × 960) and without ER-DLR (matrix = 256 × 320). Quantitative evaluation involved measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct and periductal tissues, and slope. Two radiologists independently scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality for the 2 image types using a 4-point scale. Results are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and we compared quantitative and qualitative scores employing the Wilcoxon test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In quantitative analyses, ER-DLR significantly improved SNR (21.08 [IQR: 14.85, 31.5] vs 15.07 [IQR: 9.57, 25.23], P  < 0.001), CNR (19.29 [IQR: 13.87, 24.98] vs 11.23 [IQR: 8.98, 15.74], P  < 0.001), contrast (0.96 [IQR: 0.94, 0.97] vs 0.9 [IQR: 0.87, 0.92], P  < 0.001), and slope of MRCP (0.62 [IQR: 0.56, 0.66] vs 0.49 [IQR: 0.45, 0.53], P  < 0.001). The qualitative evaluation demonstrated significant improvements in the perceived noise ( P  < 0.001), contrast ( P  = 0.013), sharpness ( P  < 0.001), and overall image quality ( P  < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ER-DLR markedly increased the resolution, SNR, and CNR of breath-hold-MRCP compared to cases without ER-DLR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"367-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本初步研究旨在评估磁共振胆管造影(MRCP)中增强分辨率深度学习重建(ER-DLR)的图像质量,并与非ER-DLR的MRCP图像进行比较。方法:我们的回顾性研究纳入34例诊断为胆道和胰腺疾病的患者。我们在3T MRI系统上使用单次屏气MRCP获得MRCP图像。我们重建了有ER-DLR(矩阵= 768 × 960)和无ER-DLR(矩阵= 256 × 320)的MRCP图像。定量评估包括测量总胆管和管周组织之间的信噪比(SNR)、对比度、对比噪声比(CNR)和斜率。两名放射科医生使用4分制对两种图像类型的图像噪声、对比度、伪影、清晰度和整体图像质量进行独立评分。结果以中位数和四分位数范围(IQR)表示,我们采用Wilcoxon检验比较定量和定性得分。结果:在定量分析中,ER-DLR显著提高了屏气mrcp的分辨率、信噪比和CNR (21.08 [IQR: 14.85, 31.5] vs 15.07 [IQR: 9.57, 25.23]), P结论:ER-DLR与未进行ER-DLR的患者相比,ER-DLR显著提高了屏气mrcp的分辨率、信噪比和CNR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning Reconstruction for Enhanced Resolution and Image Quality in Breath-Hold MRCP: A Preliminary Study.

Objective: This preliminary study aims to assess the image quality of enhanced-resolution deep learning reconstruction (ER-DLR) in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and compare it with non-ER-DLR MRCP images.

Methods: Our retrospective study incorporated 34 patients diagnosed with biliary and pancreatic disorders. We obtained MRCP images using a single breath-hold MRCP on a 3T MRI system. We reconstructed MRCP images with ER-DLR (matrix = 768 × 960) and without ER-DLR (matrix = 256 × 320). Quantitative evaluation involved measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct and periductal tissues, and slope. Two radiologists independently scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality for the 2 image types using a 4-point scale. Results are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and we compared quantitative and qualitative scores employing the Wilcoxon test.

Results: In quantitative analyses, ER-DLR significantly improved SNR (21.08 [IQR: 14.85, 31.5] vs 15.07 [IQR: 9.57, 25.23], P  < 0.001), CNR (19.29 [IQR: 13.87, 24.98] vs 11.23 [IQR: 8.98, 15.74], P  < 0.001), contrast (0.96 [IQR: 0.94, 0.97] vs 0.9 [IQR: 0.87, 0.92], P  < 0.001), and slope of MRCP (0.62 [IQR: 0.56, 0.66] vs 0.49 [IQR: 0.45, 0.53], P  < 0.001). The qualitative evaluation demonstrated significant improvements in the perceived noise ( P  < 0.001), contrast ( P  = 0.013), sharpness ( P  < 0.001), and overall image quality ( P  < 0.001).

Conclusions: ER-DLR markedly increased the resolution, SNR, and CNR of breath-hold-MRCP compared to cases without ER-DLR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信